Cargando…

Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Non-specific symptoms early in disease and the lack of specific biomarkers hinder early diagnosis. Multi-marker blood screening tests have shown promise for improving identification of early stage disease; however,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Mark J., Shield-Artin, Kristy L., Oliva, Karen, Ayhan, Mustafa, Reisman, Simone, Rice, Gregory E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23858298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.114216
_version_ 1782276746894114816
author Bailey, Mark J.
Shield-Artin, Kristy L.
Oliva, Karen
Ayhan, Mustafa
Reisman, Simone
Rice, Gregory E.
author_facet Bailey, Mark J.
Shield-Artin, Kristy L.
Oliva, Karen
Ayhan, Mustafa
Reisman, Simone
Rice, Gregory E.
author_sort Bailey, Mark J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Non-specific symptoms early in disease and the lack of specific biomarkers hinder early diagnosis. Multi-marker blood screening tests have shown promise for improving identification of early stage disease; however, available tests lack sensitivity, and specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, pooled deeply-depleted plasma from women with Stage 1, 2 or 3 ovarian cancer and healthy controls were used to compare the 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein profiles and identify potential novel markers of ovarian cancer progression. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Stage-specific variation in biomarker expression was observed. For example, apolipoprotein A1 expression is relatively low in control and Stage 1, but shows a substantial increase in Stage 2 and 3, thus, potential of utility for disease confirmation rather than early detection. A better marker for early stage disease was tropomyosin 4 (TPM4). The expression of TPM4 increased by 2-fold in Stage 2 before returning to “normal” levels in Stage 3 disease. Multiple isoforms were also identified for some proteins and in some cases, displayed stage-specific expression. An interesting example was fibrinogen alpha, for which 8 isoforms were identified. Four displayed a moderate increase at Stage 1 and a substantial increase for Stages 2 and 3 while the other 4 showed only moderate increases. CONCLUSION: Herein is provided an improved summary of blood protein profiles for women with ovarian cancer stratified by stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3709370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37093702013-07-15 Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples Bailey, Mark J. Shield-Artin, Kristy L. Oliva, Karen Ayhan, Mustafa Reisman, Simone Rice, Gregory E. J Carcinog Original Article INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Non-specific symptoms early in disease and the lack of specific biomarkers hinder early diagnosis. Multi-marker blood screening tests have shown promise for improving identification of early stage disease; however, available tests lack sensitivity, and specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, pooled deeply-depleted plasma from women with Stage 1, 2 or 3 ovarian cancer and healthy controls were used to compare the 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein profiles and identify potential novel markers of ovarian cancer progression. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Stage-specific variation in biomarker expression was observed. For example, apolipoprotein A1 expression is relatively low in control and Stage 1, but shows a substantial increase in Stage 2 and 3, thus, potential of utility for disease confirmation rather than early detection. A better marker for early stage disease was tropomyosin 4 (TPM4). The expression of TPM4 increased by 2-fold in Stage 2 before returning to “normal” levels in Stage 3 disease. Multiple isoforms were also identified for some proteins and in some cases, displayed stage-specific expression. An interesting example was fibrinogen alpha, for which 8 isoforms were identified. Four displayed a moderate increase at Stage 1 and a substantial increase for Stages 2 and 3 while the other 4 showed only moderate increases. CONCLUSION: Herein is provided an improved summary of blood protein profiles for women with ovarian cancer stratified by stage. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3709370/ /pubmed/23858298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.114216 Text en Copyright: © Bailey http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bailey, Mark J.
Shield-Artin, Kristy L.
Oliva, Karen
Ayhan, Mustafa
Reisman, Simone
Rice, Gregory E.
Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_full Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_fullStr Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_full_unstemmed Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_short Stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: Difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
title_sort stage-specific analysis of plasma protein profiles in ovarian cancer: difference in-gel electrophoresis analysis of pooled clinical samples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3709370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23858298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.114216
work_keys_str_mv AT baileymarkj stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT shieldartinkristyl stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT olivakaren stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT ayhanmustafa stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT reismansimone stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples
AT ricegregorye stagespecificanalysisofplasmaproteinprofilesinovariancancerdifferenceingelelectrophoresisanalysisofpooledclinicalsamples