Cargando…

Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record

Orientation of archaeological and paleontological materials plays a prominent role in the interpretation of site formation processes. Allochthony and authochthony are frequently assumed from orientation patterns or lack thereof. Although it is still debated to what extent orientation of items can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel, García-Pérez, Alfonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068955
_version_ 1782276826237763584
author Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel
García-Pérez, Alfonso
author_facet Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel
García-Pérez, Alfonso
author_sort Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Orientation of archaeological and paleontological materials plays a prominent role in the interpretation of site formation processes. Allochthony and authochthony are frequently assumed from orientation patterns or lack thereof. Although it is still debated to what extent orientation of items can be produced in original depositional contexts, the recent use of GIS tools to measure orientations has highlighted several ways of reproducing A-axes with which to address these taphonomic issues. In the present study, the three most relevant A-axis types are compared to test their accuracy in reproducing water current direction. Although results may be similar in specific bone shapes, differences are important in other shapes. As known in engineering working with wind and fluid mechanics (developing shape optimization), longitudinal symmetrical axes (LSA) are the one that best orient structures against or in the same direction of wind and water. The present work shows that this is also the case for bones (regardless of shape), since LSA produce the most accurate estimates of flow direction. This has important consequences for the interpretation of orientation patterns at sites, since this type of axis is still not properly reproduced by GIS available tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3710068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37100682013-07-19 Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel García-Pérez, Alfonso PLoS One Research Article Orientation of archaeological and paleontological materials plays a prominent role in the interpretation of site formation processes. Allochthony and authochthony are frequently assumed from orientation patterns or lack thereof. Although it is still debated to what extent orientation of items can be produced in original depositional contexts, the recent use of GIS tools to measure orientations has highlighted several ways of reproducing A-axes with which to address these taphonomic issues. In the present study, the three most relevant A-axis types are compared to test their accuracy in reproducing water current direction. Although results may be similar in specific bone shapes, differences are important in other shapes. As known in engineering working with wind and fluid mechanics (developing shape optimization), longitudinal symmetrical axes (LSA) are the one that best orient structures against or in the same direction of wind and water. The present work shows that this is also the case for bones (regardless of shape), since LSA produce the most accurate estimates of flow direction. This has important consequences for the interpretation of orientation patterns at sites, since this type of axis is still not properly reproduced by GIS available tools. Public Library of Science 2013-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3710068/ /pubmed/23874825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068955 Text en © 2013 Domínguez-Rodrigo, García-Pérez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel
García-Pérez, Alfonso
Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record
title Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record
title_full Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record
title_fullStr Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record
title_full_unstemmed Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record
title_short Testing the Accuracy of Different A-Axis Types for Measuring the Orientation of Bones in the Archaeological and Paleontological Record
title_sort testing the accuracy of different a-axis types for measuring the orientation of bones in the archaeological and paleontological record
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068955
work_keys_str_mv AT dominguezrodrigomanuel testingtheaccuracyofdifferentaaxistypesformeasuringtheorientationofbonesinthearchaeologicalandpaleontologicalrecord
AT garciaperezalfonso testingtheaccuracyofdifferentaaxistypesformeasuringtheorientationofbonesinthearchaeologicalandpaleontologicalrecord