Cargando…

Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions

OBJECTIVE: Clarithromycin strongly inhibits enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, preventing the metabolism of some other drugs, while azithromycin is a weak inhibitor. Accordingly, blood concentrations of other drugs increase with clarithromycin coprescription leading to adverse events. These macrolide antib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleet, Jamie L, Shariff, Salimah Z, Bailey, David G, Gandhi, Sonja, Juurlink, David N, Nash, Danielle M, Mamdani, Muhammad, Gomes, Tara, Patel, Amit M, Garg, Amit X
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002857
_version_ 1782276920686149632
author Fleet, Jamie L
Shariff, Salimah Z
Bailey, David G
Gandhi, Sonja
Juurlink, David N
Nash, Danielle M
Mamdani, Muhammad
Gomes, Tara
Patel, Amit M
Garg, Amit X
author_facet Fleet, Jamie L
Shariff, Salimah Z
Bailey, David G
Gandhi, Sonja
Juurlink, David N
Nash, Danielle M
Mamdani, Muhammad
Gomes, Tara
Patel, Amit M
Garg, Amit X
author_sort Fleet, Jamie L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Clarithromycin strongly inhibits enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, preventing the metabolism of some other drugs, while azithromycin is a weak inhibitor. Accordingly, blood concentrations of other drugs increase with clarithromycin coprescription leading to adverse events. These macrolide antibiotics also differ on other properties that may impact outcomes. In this study, we compared outcomes in two groups of macrolide antibiotic users in the absence of potentially interacting drugs. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2010. PATIENTS: Patients (mean 74 years) prescribed clarithromycin (n=52 251) or azithromycin (referent group, n=46 618). MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were hospital admission within 30 days of a new antibiotic prescription with any of the 12 conditions examined separately (acute kidney injury, acute myocardial infarction, neuroimaging (proxy for delirium), hypotension, syncope, hyperkalaemia, hyponatraemia, hyperglycaemia, arrhythmia, ischaemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding and sepsis). The secondary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups, including patient demographics, comorbid conditions, infection type and prescribing physician specialty, were nearly identical. The median daily dose was 1000 mg for clarithromycin and 300 mg for azithromycin and the median duration of dispensing antibiotics was 10 and 5 days, respectively. There was no difference between the groups in the risk of hospitalisation for any condition studied (relative risk ranged from 0.67 to 1.23). Compared with azithromycin, clarithromycin was associated with a slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality (0.46% vs 0.37%, relative risk 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin can be used to assess drug interactions in population-based studies with azithromycin serving as a control group. However, any differences in mortality observed between the two antibiotic groups in the setting of other drug use may be partially attributable to factors beyond the inhibition of drug metabolising enzymes and transporters, as the difference for this outcome was significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3710981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37109812013-07-15 Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions Fleet, Jamie L Shariff, Salimah Z Bailey, David G Gandhi, Sonja Juurlink, David N Nash, Danielle M Mamdani, Muhammad Gomes, Tara Patel, Amit M Garg, Amit X BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVE: Clarithromycin strongly inhibits enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, preventing the metabolism of some other drugs, while azithromycin is a weak inhibitor. Accordingly, blood concentrations of other drugs increase with clarithromycin coprescription leading to adverse events. These macrolide antibiotics also differ on other properties that may impact outcomes. In this study, we compared outcomes in two groups of macrolide antibiotic users in the absence of potentially interacting drugs. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2010. PATIENTS: Patients (mean 74 years) prescribed clarithromycin (n=52 251) or azithromycin (referent group, n=46 618). MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were hospital admission within 30 days of a new antibiotic prescription with any of the 12 conditions examined separately (acute kidney injury, acute myocardial infarction, neuroimaging (proxy for delirium), hypotension, syncope, hyperkalaemia, hyponatraemia, hyperglycaemia, arrhythmia, ischaemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding and sepsis). The secondary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups, including patient demographics, comorbid conditions, infection type and prescribing physician specialty, were nearly identical. The median daily dose was 1000 mg for clarithromycin and 300 mg for azithromycin and the median duration of dispensing antibiotics was 10 and 5 days, respectively. There was no difference between the groups in the risk of hospitalisation for any condition studied (relative risk ranged from 0.67 to 1.23). Compared with azithromycin, clarithromycin was associated with a slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality (0.46% vs 0.37%, relative risk 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin can be used to assess drug interactions in population-based studies with azithromycin serving as a control group. However, any differences in mortality observed between the two antibiotic groups in the setting of other drug use may be partially attributable to factors beyond the inhibition of drug metabolising enzymes and transporters, as the difference for this outcome was significant. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3710981/ /pubmed/23847265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002857 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Fleet, Jamie L
Shariff, Salimah Z
Bailey, David G
Gandhi, Sonja
Juurlink, David N
Nash, Danielle M
Mamdani, Muhammad
Gomes, Tara
Patel, Amit M
Garg, Amit X
Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
title Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
title_full Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
title_fullStr Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
title_short Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
title_sort comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
topic Pharmacology and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002857
work_keys_str_mv AT fleetjamiel comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT shariffsalimahz comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT baileydavidg comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT gandhisonja comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT juurlinkdavidn comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT nashdaniellem comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT mamdanimuhammad comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT gomestara comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT patelamitm comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions
AT gargamitx comparingtwotypesofmacrolideantibioticsforthepurposeofassessingpopulationbaseddruginteractions