Cargando…

Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether smokers smoking from packs required under Australia's plain packaging law had different smoking beliefs and quitting thoughts, compared with those still smoking from branded packs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey during the roll-out phase of the law, analysed by t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakefield, Melanie A, Hayes, Linda, Durkin, Sarah, Borland, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175
_version_ 1782276922251673600
author Wakefield, Melanie A
Hayes, Linda
Durkin, Sarah
Borland, Ron
author_facet Wakefield, Melanie A
Hayes, Linda
Durkin, Sarah
Borland, Ron
author_sort Wakefield, Melanie A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether smokers smoking from packs required under Australia's plain packaging law had different smoking beliefs and quitting thoughts, compared with those still smoking from branded packs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey during the roll-out phase of the law, analysed by timing of survey. SETTING: Australian state of Victoria, November 2012. PARTICIPANTS: 536 cigarette smokers with a usual brand, of whom 72.3% were smoking from a plain pack and 27.7% were smoking from a branded pack. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived quality and satisfaction of cigarettes compared with 1 year ago, frequency of thoughts of smoking harm, perceived exaggeration of harms, frequency of thoughts of quitting, quitting priority in life, intention to quit, approval of large graphic health warnings and plain packaging. RESULTS: Compared with branded pack smokers, those smoking from plain packs perceived their cigarettes to be lower in quality (adjusted OR (AdjOR)=1.66, p=0.045), tended to perceive their cigarettes as less satisfying than a year ago (AdjOR=1.70, p=0.052), were more likely to have thought about quitting at least once a day in the past week (AdjOR=1.81, p=0.013) and to rate quitting as a higher priority in their lives (F=13.11, df=1, p<0.001). Plain pack smokers were more likely to support the policy than branded pack smokers (AdjOR=1.51, p=0.049). Branded and plain pack smokers did not differ on measures of less immediate smoking intentions, frequency of thoughts about harms or perceived exaggeration of harms. Appeal outcomes, but not other outcomes, were sensitive to the extent of roll-out, with responses from branded pack smokers approaching those of plain pack smokers, once 80% of survey respondents were smoking from plain packs 1–2 weeks before the December implementation date. CONCLUSIONS: The early indication is that plain packaging is associated with lower smoking appeal, more support for the policy and more urgency to quit among adult smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3710988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37109882013-07-15 Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study Wakefield, Melanie A Hayes, Linda Durkin, Sarah Borland, Ron BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVE: To determine whether smokers smoking from packs required under Australia's plain packaging law had different smoking beliefs and quitting thoughts, compared with those still smoking from branded packs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey during the roll-out phase of the law, analysed by timing of survey. SETTING: Australian state of Victoria, November 2012. PARTICIPANTS: 536 cigarette smokers with a usual brand, of whom 72.3% were smoking from a plain pack and 27.7% were smoking from a branded pack. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived quality and satisfaction of cigarettes compared with 1 year ago, frequency of thoughts of smoking harm, perceived exaggeration of harms, frequency of thoughts of quitting, quitting priority in life, intention to quit, approval of large graphic health warnings and plain packaging. RESULTS: Compared with branded pack smokers, those smoking from plain packs perceived their cigarettes to be lower in quality (adjusted OR (AdjOR)=1.66, p=0.045), tended to perceive their cigarettes as less satisfying than a year ago (AdjOR=1.70, p=0.052), were more likely to have thought about quitting at least once a day in the past week (AdjOR=1.81, p=0.013) and to rate quitting as a higher priority in their lives (F=13.11, df=1, p<0.001). Plain pack smokers were more likely to support the policy than branded pack smokers (AdjOR=1.51, p=0.049). Branded and plain pack smokers did not differ on measures of less immediate smoking intentions, frequency of thoughts about harms or perceived exaggeration of harms. Appeal outcomes, but not other outcomes, were sensitive to the extent of roll-out, with responses from branded pack smokers approaching those of plain pack smokers, once 80% of survey respondents were smoking from plain packs 1–2 weeks before the December implementation date. CONCLUSIONS: The early indication is that plain packaging is associated with lower smoking appeal, more support for the policy and more urgency to quit among adult smokers. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3710988/ /pubmed/23878174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Wakefield, Melanie A
Hayes, Linda
Durkin, Sarah
Borland, Ron
Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
title Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
title_full Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
title_short Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
title_sort introduction effects of the australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3710988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175
work_keys_str_mv AT wakefieldmelaniea introductioneffectsoftheaustralianplainpackagingpolicyonadultsmokersacrosssectionalstudy
AT hayeslinda introductioneffectsoftheaustralianplainpackagingpolicyonadultsmokersacrosssectionalstudy
AT durkinsarah introductioneffectsoftheaustralianplainpackagingpolicyonadultsmokersacrosssectionalstudy
AT borlandron introductioneffectsoftheaustralianplainpackagingpolicyonadultsmokersacrosssectionalstudy