Cargando…
Retrospective claims analysis of best supportive care costs and survival in a US metastatic renal cell population
INTRODUCTION: Survival and best supportive care (BSC) costs for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), after stopping therapy, are poorly characterized yet an important aspect of patient care. This study examined survival and costs associated with BSC after one or two lines of therapy...
Autores principales: | Henk, Henry J, Chen, Connie, Benedict, Agnes, Sullivan, Jane, Teitelbaum, April |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3711649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874112 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S45756 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A cost‐effectiveness analysis of avelumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone as first‐line maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan
por: Su, Po‐Jung, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Healthcare costs related to adverse events in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: A retrospective observational claims study
por: Lal, Lincy S., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Healthcare Costs in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of US Medicare Fee-For-Service Claims
por: Freedland, Stephen J., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs. Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
por: Xie, Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Best Methods for Newly Claimed Areas
Publicado: (1921)