Cargando…
Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment is one of the major pharmacologic treatments for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, the choice of antibiotic depends on the local resistance pattern. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was done in patients with AEC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3711651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874094 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S41749 |
_version_ | 1782276960202784768 |
---|---|
author | Yoon, Ho II Lee, Chang-Hoon Kim, Deog Kyeom Park, Geun Min Lee, Sang-Min Yim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jae-Yeol Lee, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Chung, Hee Soon Kim, Young Whan Han, Sung Koo Yoo, Chul-Gyu |
author_facet | Yoon, Ho II Lee, Chang-Hoon Kim, Deog Kyeom Park, Geun Min Lee, Sang-Min Yim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jae-Yeol Lee, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Chung, Hee Soon Kim, Young Whan Han, Sung Koo Yoo, Chul-Gyu |
author_sort | Yoon, Ho II |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment is one of the major pharmacologic treatments for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, the choice of antibiotic depends on the local resistance pattern. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was done in patients with AECOPD to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin with that of cefuroxime axetil. METHODS: Patients with AECOPD and without radiographic evidence of pneumonia were enrolled and randomized to either levofloxacin 500 mg daily or cefuroxime 250 mg twice daily in the mildmoderate exacerbation group, or 500 mg twice daily in the severe exacerbation group, for seven days. Clinical efficacy and microbiologic response were evaluated 5–7 days after the last dose. RESULTS: Treatment was clinically successful in 90.4% of patients in the levofloxacin group, and in 90.6% of patients in the cefuroxime group (95% confidence interval −9.40 to 10.91), within a noninferiority margin of 10%. The microbiologic response appeared to be higher in the levofloxacin group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The safety profile was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin is not inferior to cefuroxime with regard to clinical efficacy in treating AECOPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3711651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37116512013-07-19 Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Yoon, Ho II Lee, Chang-Hoon Kim, Deog Kyeom Park, Geun Min Lee, Sang-Min Yim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jae-Yeol Lee, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Chung, Hee Soon Kim, Young Whan Han, Sung Koo Yoo, Chul-Gyu Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment is one of the major pharmacologic treatments for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, the choice of antibiotic depends on the local resistance pattern. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was done in patients with AECOPD to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin with that of cefuroxime axetil. METHODS: Patients with AECOPD and without radiographic evidence of pneumonia were enrolled and randomized to either levofloxacin 500 mg daily or cefuroxime 250 mg twice daily in the mildmoderate exacerbation group, or 500 mg twice daily in the severe exacerbation group, for seven days. Clinical efficacy and microbiologic response were evaluated 5–7 days after the last dose. RESULTS: Treatment was clinically successful in 90.4% of patients in the levofloxacin group, and in 90.6% of patients in the cefuroxime group (95% confidence interval −9.40 to 10.91), within a noninferiority margin of 10%. The microbiologic response appeared to be higher in the levofloxacin group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The safety profile was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin is not inferior to cefuroxime with regard to clinical efficacy in treating AECOPD. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3711651/ /pubmed/23874094 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S41749 Text en © 2013 Yoon et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yoon, Ho II Lee, Chang-Hoon Kim, Deog Kyeom Park, Geun Min Lee, Sang-Min Yim, Jae-Joon Kim, Jae-Yeol Lee, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Chung, Hee Soon Kim, Young Whan Han, Sung Koo Yoo, Chul-Gyu Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
title | Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
title_full | Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
title_short | Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
title_sort | efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3711651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874094 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S41749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoonhoii efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT leechanghoon efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT kimdeogkyeom efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT parkgeunmin efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT leesangmin efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT yimjaejoon efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT kimjaeyeol efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT leejaeho efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT leechoontaek efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT chungheesoon efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT kimyoungwhan efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT hansungkoo efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT yoochulgyu efficacyoflevofloxacinversuscefuroximeintreatingacuteexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease |