Cargando…
Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor?
BACKGROUND: Several researchers have determined the tumor length to be an important prognostic indictor of esophageal cancer (EC). However, controversy exists concerning the optimal cut-off points for tumor length to predict overall survival. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic val...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.792887 |
_version_ | 1782277190581223424 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Ji-Feng Huang, Ying Zhao, Qiang |
author_facet | Feng, Ji-Feng Huang, Ying Zhao, Qiang |
author_sort | Feng, Ji-Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several researchers have determined the tumor length to be an important prognostic indictor of esophageal cancer (EC). However, controversy exists concerning the optimal cut-off points for tumor length to predict overall survival. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of tumor length and propose the optimum cut-off point for tumor length in predicting survival difference in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2009, a retrospective analysis of 132 consecutive patients older than 70 years with ESCC was conducted. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for survival prediction was plotted to verify the optimum cut-off point for tumor length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic parameters for survival. RESULTS: A ROC curve for survival prediction was plotted to verify the optimum cut-off point for tumor length, which was 4.0 cm. Patients with tumor length ≤4.0 cm had significantly better 5-year survival rate than patients with a tumor length >4.0 cm (60.7% versus 31.6%, P = 0.007). Multivariate analyses showed that tumor length (>4.0 cm versus ≤4.0 cm, P = 0.036), differentiation (poor versus well/moderate, P = 0.032), N staging (N1-3 versus N0, P = 0.018), and T grade (T3-4 versus T1-2, P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Tumor length is a predictive factor for long-term survival in elderly patients with ESCC, especially in T3-4 grade or nodal-negative patients. We conclude that 4.0 cm may be the optimum cut-off point for tumor length in predicting survival in elderly patients with ESCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3713379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37133792013-08-01 Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? Feng, Ji-Feng Huang, Ying Zhao, Qiang Ups J Med Sci Original Articles BACKGROUND: Several researchers have determined the tumor length to be an important prognostic indictor of esophageal cancer (EC). However, controversy exists concerning the optimal cut-off points for tumor length to predict overall survival. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of tumor length and propose the optimum cut-off point for tumor length in predicting survival difference in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2009, a retrospective analysis of 132 consecutive patients older than 70 years with ESCC was conducted. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for survival prediction was plotted to verify the optimum cut-off point for tumor length. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic parameters for survival. RESULTS: A ROC curve for survival prediction was plotted to verify the optimum cut-off point for tumor length, which was 4.0 cm. Patients with tumor length ≤4.0 cm had significantly better 5-year survival rate than patients with a tumor length >4.0 cm (60.7% versus 31.6%, P = 0.007). Multivariate analyses showed that tumor length (>4.0 cm versus ≤4.0 cm, P = 0.036), differentiation (poor versus well/moderate, P = 0.032), N staging (N1-3 versus N0, P = 0.018), and T grade (T3-4 versus T1-2, P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Tumor length is a predictive factor for long-term survival in elderly patients with ESCC, especially in T3-4 grade or nodal-negative patients. We conclude that 4.0 cm may be the optimum cut-off point for tumor length in predicting survival in elderly patients with ESCC. Informa Healthcare 2013-08 2013-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3713379/ /pubmed/23617771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.792887 Text en © Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Feng, Ji-Feng Huang, Ying Zhao, Qiang Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? |
title | Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? |
title_full | Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? |
title_fullStr | Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? |
title_short | Tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is it a prognostic factor? |
title_sort | tumor length in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: is it a prognostic factor? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.792887 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengjifeng tumorlengthinelderlypatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaisitaprognosticfactor AT huangying tumorlengthinelderlypatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaisitaprognosticfactor AT zhaoqiang tumorlengthinelderlypatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaisitaprognosticfactor |