Cargando…

Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND: To improve neurointensive care (NIC) and outcome for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients it is crucial to define and monitor indexes of the quality of patient care. With this purpose we established the web-based Uppsala TBI register in 2008. In this study we will describe and analyze t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyholm, Lena, Howells, Tim, Enblad, Per, Lewén, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23837596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.806616
_version_ 1782277191283769344
author Nyholm, Lena
Howells, Tim
Enblad, Per
Lewén, Anders
author_facet Nyholm, Lena
Howells, Tim
Enblad, Per
Lewén, Anders
author_sort Nyholm, Lena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To improve neurointensive care (NIC) and outcome for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients it is crucial to define and monitor indexes of the quality of patient care. With this purpose we established the web-based Uppsala TBI register in 2008. In this study we will describe and analyze the data collected during the first three years of this project. METHODS: Data from the medical charts were organized in three columns containing: 1) Admission data; 2) Data from the NIC period including neurosurgery, type of monitoring, treatment, complications, neurological condition at discharge, and the amount of secondary insults; 3) Outcome six months after injury. Indexes of the quality of care implemented include: 1) Index of improvement; 2) Index of change; 3) The percentages of ‘Talk and die' and ‘Talk and deteriorate' patients. RESULTS: Altogether 314 patients were included 2008–2010: 66 women and 248 men aged 0–86 years. Automatic reports showed that the proportion of patients improving during NIC varied between 80% and 60%. The percentage of deteriorated patients was less than 10%. The percentage of Talk and die/Talk and deteriorate cases was <1%. The mean Glasgow Coma Score (Motor) improved from 5.04 to 5.68 during the NIC unit stay. The occurrences of secondary insults were less than 5% of good monitoring time for intracranial pressure (ICP) >25 mmHg, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) <50 mmHg, and systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg. Favorable outcome was achieved by 64% of adults. CONCLUSION: The Uppsala TBI register enables the routine monitoring of NIC quality indexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3713382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37133822013-08-01 Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome Nyholm, Lena Howells, Tim Enblad, Per Lewén, Anders Ups J Med Sci Original Articles BACKGROUND: To improve neurointensive care (NIC) and outcome for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients it is crucial to define and monitor indexes of the quality of patient care. With this purpose we established the web-based Uppsala TBI register in 2008. In this study we will describe and analyze the data collected during the first three years of this project. METHODS: Data from the medical charts were organized in three columns containing: 1) Admission data; 2) Data from the NIC period including neurosurgery, type of monitoring, treatment, complications, neurological condition at discharge, and the amount of secondary insults; 3) Outcome six months after injury. Indexes of the quality of care implemented include: 1) Index of improvement; 2) Index of change; 3) The percentages of ‘Talk and die' and ‘Talk and deteriorate' patients. RESULTS: Altogether 314 patients were included 2008–2010: 66 women and 248 men aged 0–86 years. Automatic reports showed that the proportion of patients improving during NIC varied between 80% and 60%. The percentage of deteriorated patients was less than 10%. The percentage of Talk and die/Talk and deteriorate cases was <1%. The mean Glasgow Coma Score (Motor) improved from 5.04 to 5.68 during the NIC unit stay. The occurrences of secondary insults were less than 5% of good monitoring time for intracranial pressure (ICP) >25 mmHg, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) <50 mmHg, and systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg. Favorable outcome was achieved by 64% of adults. CONCLUSION: The Uppsala TBI register enables the routine monitoring of NIC quality indexes. Informa Healthcare 2013-08 2013-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3713382/ /pubmed/23837596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.806616 Text en © Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nyholm, Lena
Howells, Tim
Enblad, Per
Lewén, Anders
Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
title Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
title_full Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
title_fullStr Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
title_short Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
title_sort introduction of the uppsala traumatic brain injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23837596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2013.806616
work_keys_str_mv AT nyholmlena introductionoftheuppsalatraumaticbraininjuryregisterforregularsurveillanceofpatientcharacteristicsandneurointensivecaremanagementincludingsecondaryinsultquantificationandclinicaloutcome
AT howellstim introductionoftheuppsalatraumaticbraininjuryregisterforregularsurveillanceofpatientcharacteristicsandneurointensivecaremanagementincludingsecondaryinsultquantificationandclinicaloutcome
AT enbladper introductionoftheuppsalatraumaticbraininjuryregisterforregularsurveillanceofpatientcharacteristicsandneurointensivecaremanagementincludingsecondaryinsultquantificationandclinicaloutcome
AT lewenanders introductionoftheuppsalatraumaticbraininjuryregisterforregularsurveillanceofpatientcharacteristicsandneurointensivecaremanagementincludingsecondaryinsultquantificationandclinicaloutcome