Cargando…
Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) technique is one of the important factors of in vitro fertlization success. Among the different steps in ET technique, less attention has been given to embryo loading (EL). The aim was to compare the impact of two different techniques of EL on pregnancy rate in IVF/E...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869155 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112385 |
_version_ | 1782277209397919744 |
---|---|
author | Halvaei, Iman Khalili, Mohammad Ali Razi, Mohammad H Agha-Rahimi, Azam Nottola, Stefania A |
author_facet | Halvaei, Iman Khalili, Mohammad Ali Razi, Mohammad H Agha-Rahimi, Azam Nottola, Stefania A |
author_sort | Halvaei, Iman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) technique is one of the important factors of in vitro fertlization success. Among the different steps in ET technique, less attention has been given to embryo loading (EL). The aim was to compare the impact of two different techniques of EL on pregnancy rate in IVF/ET cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 144 and 170 patients were placed in groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, the embryos were drawn directly into the ET catheter from culture microdrop under the oil. In Group B, the embryos were transferred from culture microdrop into G2 medium in center-well dish. Then, the embryos were drawn into the catheter and finally transferred into the uterus. Both groups were adjusted for other parameters based on the EL technique. The main outcome measure was pregnancy rate. RESULTS: There were insignificant differences for etiology of infertility, source of sperm, type of stimulation protocol, percent of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection type of ET catheter, cycles with good quality embryos and transferred embryos between two groups. The rate of both chemical and clinical pregnancy was higher in Group B compared to A, but the difference was insignificant (P = 0.09 and P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: It seems that there is no difference in the outcome by loading the embryo from microdrop or center-well dish. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3713581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37135812013-07-18 Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles Halvaei, Iman Khalili, Mohammad Ali Razi, Mohammad H Agha-Rahimi, Azam Nottola, Stefania A J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) technique is one of the important factors of in vitro fertlization success. Among the different steps in ET technique, less attention has been given to embryo loading (EL). The aim was to compare the impact of two different techniques of EL on pregnancy rate in IVF/ET cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 144 and 170 patients were placed in groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, the embryos were drawn directly into the ET catheter from culture microdrop under the oil. In Group B, the embryos were transferred from culture microdrop into G2 medium in center-well dish. Then, the embryos were drawn into the catheter and finally transferred into the uterus. Both groups were adjusted for other parameters based on the EL technique. The main outcome measure was pregnancy rate. RESULTS: There were insignificant differences for etiology of infertility, source of sperm, type of stimulation protocol, percent of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection type of ET catheter, cycles with good quality embryos and transferred embryos between two groups. The rate of both chemical and clinical pregnancy was higher in Group B compared to A, but the difference was insignificant (P = 0.09 and P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: It seems that there is no difference in the outcome by loading the embryo from microdrop or center-well dish. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3713581/ /pubmed/23869155 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112385 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Halvaei, Iman Khalili, Mohammad Ali Razi, Mohammad H Agha-Rahimi, Azam Nottola, Stefania A Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
title | Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
title_full | Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
title_fullStr | Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
title_short | Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
title_sort | impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869155 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halvaeiiman impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles AT khalilimohammadali impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles AT razimohammadh impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles AT agharahimiazam impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles AT nottolastefaniaa impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles |