Cargando…

Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) technique is one of the important factors of in vitro fertlization success. Among the different steps in ET technique, less attention has been given to embryo loading (EL). The aim was to compare the impact of two different techniques of EL on pregnancy rate in IVF/E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halvaei, Iman, Khalili, Mohammad Ali, Razi, Mohammad H, Agha-Rahimi, Azam, Nottola, Stefania A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869155
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112385
_version_ 1782277209397919744
author Halvaei, Iman
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Razi, Mohammad H
Agha-Rahimi, Azam
Nottola, Stefania A
author_facet Halvaei, Iman
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Razi, Mohammad H
Agha-Rahimi, Azam
Nottola, Stefania A
author_sort Halvaei, Iman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) technique is one of the important factors of in vitro fertlization success. Among the different steps in ET technique, less attention has been given to embryo loading (EL). The aim was to compare the impact of two different techniques of EL on pregnancy rate in IVF/ET cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 144 and 170 patients were placed in groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, the embryos were drawn directly into the ET catheter from culture microdrop under the oil. In Group B, the embryos were transferred from culture microdrop into G2 medium in center-well dish. Then, the embryos were drawn into the catheter and finally transferred into the uterus. Both groups were adjusted for other parameters based on the EL technique. The main outcome measure was pregnancy rate. RESULTS: There were insignificant differences for etiology of infertility, source of sperm, type of stimulation protocol, percent of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection type of ET catheter, cycles with good quality embryos and transferred embryos between two groups. The rate of both chemical and clinical pregnancy was higher in Group B compared to A, but the difference was insignificant (P = 0.09 and P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: It seems that there is no difference in the outcome by loading the embryo from microdrop or center-well dish.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3713581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37135812013-07-18 Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles Halvaei, Iman Khalili, Mohammad Ali Razi, Mohammad H Agha-Rahimi, Azam Nottola, Stefania A J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) technique is one of the important factors of in vitro fertlization success. Among the different steps in ET technique, less attention has been given to embryo loading (EL). The aim was to compare the impact of two different techniques of EL on pregnancy rate in IVF/ET cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 144 and 170 patients were placed in groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, the embryos were drawn directly into the ET catheter from culture microdrop under the oil. In Group B, the embryos were transferred from culture microdrop into G2 medium in center-well dish. Then, the embryos were drawn into the catheter and finally transferred into the uterus. Both groups were adjusted for other parameters based on the EL technique. The main outcome measure was pregnancy rate. RESULTS: There were insignificant differences for etiology of infertility, source of sperm, type of stimulation protocol, percent of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection type of ET catheter, cycles with good quality embryos and transferred embryos between two groups. The rate of both chemical and clinical pregnancy was higher in Group B compared to A, but the difference was insignificant (P = 0.09 and P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: It seems that there is no difference in the outcome by loading the embryo from microdrop or center-well dish. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3713581/ /pubmed/23869155 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112385 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Halvaei, Iman
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Razi, Mohammad H
Agha-Rahimi, Azam
Nottola, Stefania A
Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
title Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
title_full Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
title_fullStr Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
title_short Impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
title_sort impact of different embryo loading techniques on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertlization/embryo transfer cycles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869155
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112385
work_keys_str_mv AT halvaeiiman impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles
AT khalilimohammadali impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles
AT razimohammadh impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles
AT agharahimiazam impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles
AT nottolastefaniaa impactofdifferentembryoloadingtechniquesonpregnancyratesininvitrofertlizationembryotransfercycles