Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars

BACKGROUND: Furcation invasions represent one of the most demanding therapeutic challenges in periodontics. This investigation assessed and compared the clinical efficacy of hydroxyapatite bone graft material when used alone and with collagen membrane in the treatment of grade II furcation defects....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prathap, Sruthy, Hegde, Shashikanth, Kashyap, Rajesh, Prathap, M. S., Arunkumar, M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869132
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.113083
_version_ 1782277237464104960
author Prathap, Sruthy
Hegde, Shashikanth
Kashyap, Rajesh
Prathap, M. S.
Arunkumar, M. S.
author_facet Prathap, Sruthy
Hegde, Shashikanth
Kashyap, Rajesh
Prathap, M. S.
Arunkumar, M. S.
author_sort Prathap, Sruthy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Furcation invasions represent one of the most demanding therapeutic challenges in periodontics. This investigation assessed and compared the clinical efficacy of hydroxyapatite bone graft material when used alone and with collagen membrane in the treatment of grade II furcation defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with comparable bilateral furcation defects in relation to mandibular first molars were selected and treated in a split-mouth design. After the hygiene phase of therapy was completed, the groups were selected randomly either for treatment with hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) alone or with a combination of bone graft and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membrane (Periocol). Clinical parameters like plaque index, gingival index, vertical probing depth, horizontal probing depth, clinical attachment level, position of marginal gingiva, and the amount of bone fill were used at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months, both surgical procedures resulted in statistically significant reduction in vertical and horizontal probing depths and gain in the clinical attachment level. CONCLUSION: The use of combination technique yielded superior results compared to sites treated with bone graft alone. However, the difference was not statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3713757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37137572013-07-18 Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars Prathap, Sruthy Hegde, Shashikanth Kashyap, Rajesh Prathap, M. S. Arunkumar, M. S. J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Furcation invasions represent one of the most demanding therapeutic challenges in periodontics. This investigation assessed and compared the clinical efficacy of hydroxyapatite bone graft material when used alone and with collagen membrane in the treatment of grade II furcation defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with comparable bilateral furcation defects in relation to mandibular first molars were selected and treated in a split-mouth design. After the hygiene phase of therapy was completed, the groups were selected randomly either for treatment with hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) alone or with a combination of bone graft and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membrane (Periocol). Clinical parameters like plaque index, gingival index, vertical probing depth, horizontal probing depth, clinical attachment level, position of marginal gingiva, and the amount of bone fill were used at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months, both surgical procedures resulted in statistically significant reduction in vertical and horizontal probing depths and gain in the clinical attachment level. CONCLUSION: The use of combination technique yielded superior results compared to sites treated with bone graft alone. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3713757/ /pubmed/23869132 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.113083 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prathap, Sruthy
Hegde, Shashikanth
Kashyap, Rajesh
Prathap, M. S.
Arunkumar, M. S.
Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
title Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
title_full Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
title_short Clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Periobone G) with and without collagen membrane (Periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade II furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
title_sort clinical evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (periobone g) with and without collagen membrane (periocol) in the treatment of bilateral grade ii furcation defects in mandibular first permanent molars
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869132
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.113083
work_keys_str_mv AT prathapsruthy clinicalevaluationofporoushydroxyapatitebonegraftperiobonegwithandwithoutcollagenmembraneperiocolinthetreatmentofbilateralgradeiifurcationdefectsinmandibularfirstpermanentmolars
AT hegdeshashikanth clinicalevaluationofporoushydroxyapatitebonegraftperiobonegwithandwithoutcollagenmembraneperiocolinthetreatmentofbilateralgradeiifurcationdefectsinmandibularfirstpermanentmolars
AT kashyaprajesh clinicalevaluationofporoushydroxyapatitebonegraftperiobonegwithandwithoutcollagenmembraneperiocolinthetreatmentofbilateralgradeiifurcationdefectsinmandibularfirstpermanentmolars
AT prathapms clinicalevaluationofporoushydroxyapatitebonegraftperiobonegwithandwithoutcollagenmembraneperiocolinthetreatmentofbilateralgradeiifurcationdefectsinmandibularfirstpermanentmolars
AT arunkumarms clinicalevaluationofporoushydroxyapatitebonegraftperiobonegwithandwithoutcollagenmembraneperiocolinthetreatmentofbilateralgradeiifurcationdefectsinmandibularfirstpermanentmolars