Cargando…

Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin

Background and aims. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect ofsurface treatment with Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) lasers on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and methods. Sixty eight cylindrical samples of a silorane-based composite resin (Fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alizadeh Oskoee, Parnian, Mohammadi, Narmin, Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel, Kimyai, Soodabeh, Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh, Rikhtegaran, Sahand, Shojaeei, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23875082
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.011
_version_ 1782277254125977600
author Alizadeh Oskoee, Parnian
Mohammadi, Narmin
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh
Rikhtegaran, Sahand
Shojaeei, Maryam
author_facet Alizadeh Oskoee, Parnian
Mohammadi, Narmin
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh
Rikhtegaran, Sahand
Shojaeei, Maryam
author_sort Alizadeh Oskoee, Parnian
collection PubMed
description Background and aims. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect ofsurface treatment with Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) lasers on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and methods. Sixty eight cylindrical samples of a silorane-based composite resin (Filtek Silorane) were pre-pared and randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1: without surface treatment; groups 2, 3 and 4 with surface treatments using Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) lasers, respectively. A positive control group (group 5) was assigned in order to measure cohesive strength. Repair shear bond strength values were measured and data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test at a significance level of α=0.05. Results. There were statistically significant differences in repair shear bond strength values between group 2 and other groups (P < 0.05); and between group 1and groups 3and 4 (P < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences be-tween groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.91). Conclusion. The repair shear bond strength of silorane-based composite resin was acceptable by surface treatment with lasers
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3713862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37138622013-04-19 Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin Alizadeh Oskoee, Parnian Mohammadi, Narmin Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel Kimyai, Soodabeh Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh Rikhtegaran, Sahand Shojaeei, Maryam J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect ofsurface treatment with Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) lasers on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin. Materials and methods. Sixty eight cylindrical samples of a silorane-based composite resin (Filtek Silorane) were pre-pared and randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1: without surface treatment; groups 2, 3 and 4 with surface treatments using Er; Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) lasers, respectively. A positive control group (group 5) was assigned in order to measure cohesive strength. Repair shear bond strength values were measured and data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test at a significance level of α=0.05. Results. There were statistically significant differences in repair shear bond strength values between group 2 and other groups (P < 0.05); and between group 1and groups 3and 4 (P < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences be-tween groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.91). Conclusion. The repair shear bond strength of silorane-based composite resin was acceptable by surface treatment with lasers Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2013 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3713862/ /pubmed/23875082 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.011 Text en © 2013 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alizadeh Oskoee, Parnian
Mohammadi, Narmin
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh
Rikhtegaran, Sahand
Shojaeei, Maryam
Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin
title Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin
title_full Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin
title_fullStr Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin
title_short Effect of Surface Treatment with Er;Cr:YSSG, Nd:YAG, and CO(2) Lasers on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Composite Resin
title_sort effect of surface treatment with er;cr:yssg, nd:yag, and co(2) lasers on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23875082
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.011
work_keys_str_mv AT alizadehoskoeeparnian effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin
AT mohammadinarmin effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin
AT ebrahimichaharommohammadesmaeel effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin
AT kimyaisoodabeh effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin
AT pournaghiazarfatemeh effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin
AT rikhtegaransahand effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin
AT shojaeeimaryam effectofsurfacetreatmentwithercryssgndyagandco2lasersonrepairshearbondstrengthofasiloranebasedcompositeresin