Cargando…
Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales
The main purposes of the present study were to see how the term “euthanasia” influences people’s support for or opposition to euthanasia; and to see how euthanasia attitude relates to religious orientation and personality factors. In this study two different euthanasia attitude scales were compared....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908751 |
_version_ | 1782476586817159168 |
---|---|
author | Aghababaei, Naser Farahani, Hojjatollah Hatami, Javad |
author_facet | Aghababaei, Naser Farahani, Hojjatollah Hatami, Javad |
author_sort | Aghababaei, Naser |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main purposes of the present study were to see how the term “euthanasia” influences people’s support for or opposition to euthanasia; and to see how euthanasia attitude relates to religious orientation and personality factors. In this study two different euthanasia attitude scales were compared. 197 students were selected to fill out either the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) or Wasserman’s Attitude Towards Euthanasia scale (ATE scale). The former scale includes the term “euthanasia”, the latter does not. All participants filled out 50 items of International Personality Item Pool, 16 items of the the HEXACO openness, and 14 items of Religious Orientation Scale-Revised. Results indicated that even though the two groups were not different in terms of gender, age, education, religiosity and personality, mean score on the ATE scale was significantly higher than that of the EAS. Euthanasia attitude was negatively correlated with religiosity and conscientiousness and it was positively correlated with psychoticism and openness. It can be concluded that analyzing the attitude towards euthanasia with the use of EAS rather than the ATE scale results in lower levels of opposition against euthanasia. This study raises the question of whether euthanasia attitude scales should contain definitions and concepts of euthanasia or they should describe cases of it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3713934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37139342013-08-01 Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales Aghababaei, Naser Farahani, Hojjatollah Hatami, Javad J Med Ethics Hist Med Articles The main purposes of the present study were to see how the term “euthanasia” influences people’s support for or opposition to euthanasia; and to see how euthanasia attitude relates to religious orientation and personality factors. In this study two different euthanasia attitude scales were compared. 197 students were selected to fill out either the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) or Wasserman’s Attitude Towards Euthanasia scale (ATE scale). The former scale includes the term “euthanasia”, the latter does not. All participants filled out 50 items of International Personality Item Pool, 16 items of the the HEXACO openness, and 14 items of Religious Orientation Scale-Revised. Results indicated that even though the two groups were not different in terms of gender, age, education, religiosity and personality, mean score on the ATE scale was significantly higher than that of the EAS. Euthanasia attitude was negatively correlated with religiosity and conscientiousness and it was positively correlated with psychoticism and openness. It can be concluded that analyzing the attitude towards euthanasia with the use of EAS rather than the ATE scale results in lower levels of opposition against euthanasia. This study raises the question of whether euthanasia attitude scales should contain definitions and concepts of euthanasia or they should describe cases of it. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3713934/ /pubmed/23908751 Text en © 2011 Naser Aghababaei, Hojjatollah Farahani and Javad Hatami; licensee Tehran Univ. Med. Sci. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Articles Aghababaei, Naser Farahani, Hojjatollah Hatami, Javad Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales |
title | Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales |
title_full | Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales |
title_fullStr | Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales |
title_full_unstemmed | Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales |
title_short | Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales |
title_sort | euthanasia attitude; a comparison of two scales |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aghababaeinaser euthanasiaattitudeacomparisonoftwoscales AT farahanihojjatollah euthanasiaattitudeacomparisonoftwoscales AT hatamijavad euthanasiaattitudeacomparisonoftwoscales |