Cargando…

Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude

Alterations in pharmacy practice from prescription dispensing to more patient-centered relationship intensifies the necessity of clinical decision-making. Pharmacists’ knowledge as well as ethical reasoning affects their clinical decision-making. Unfortunately in Iran pharmacy ethics did not develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharif, Pooneh Salari, Javadi, Mohammadreza, Asghari, Fariba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908747
_version_ 1782476601404948480
author Sharif, Pooneh Salari
Javadi, Mohammadreza
Asghari, Fariba
author_facet Sharif, Pooneh Salari
Javadi, Mohammadreza
Asghari, Fariba
author_sort Sharif, Pooneh Salari
collection PubMed
description Alterations in pharmacy practice from prescription dispensing to more patient-centered relationship intensifies the necessity of clinical decision-making. Pharmacists’ knowledge as well as ethical reasoning affects their clinical decision-making. Unfortunately in Iran pharmacy ethics did not develop along with medical ethics and special considerations are of major importance. The study was designed to evaluate pharmacists’ attitude toward some principles of bioethics. A cross-sectional survey was performed on a sample of Iranian pharmacists attended in continuous education programs in 2010. Based on the pharmacists’ attitude toward common ethical problems, 9 Likert-type scale scenarios were designed. A thousand pharmacists were surveyed and 505 questionnaires were filled. For the whole questionnaire the strongly disagree answer was the most ethical answer. On a scale from 1–5 on which 5=strongly disagree, the total score of pharmacists ethical attitude was 17.69 ± 3.57. For easier analysis we considered the score of 1 for agree and strongly agree answers, score of 2 for neutral answers and score of 3 for disagree and strongly disagree answers. The total score in confidentiality for all participants was 4.15 ± 1.45 out of 9, in autonomy 6.25 ± 1.85 out of 9, in non-maleficence 5.14 ± 1.17 out of 6 and in justice was 2.27 ± 0.89 out of 3, however there was no significant difference between men and women in the total score and the score of each theme. The older participants (> 40 years) significantly had lower total score (P< 0.05) as well as the score of each theme (P< 0.05), except for non-maleficence. The work experience showed impact on the pharmacists’ attitude toward autonomy and the participants with more than 5 years work experience significantly obtained lower score in this theme. Compiling ethical guidelines and improving pharmacy ethics curriculum is highly critical to provide the best pharmaceutical care and to make clinical decisions in critical situations. Therefore further quantitative and qualitative investigations into finding pitfalls and challenges in this issue are highly recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3714006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37140062013-08-01 Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude Sharif, Pooneh Salari Javadi, Mohammadreza Asghari, Fariba J Med Ethics Hist Med Articles Alterations in pharmacy practice from prescription dispensing to more patient-centered relationship intensifies the necessity of clinical decision-making. Pharmacists’ knowledge as well as ethical reasoning affects their clinical decision-making. Unfortunately in Iran pharmacy ethics did not develop along with medical ethics and special considerations are of major importance. The study was designed to evaluate pharmacists’ attitude toward some principles of bioethics. A cross-sectional survey was performed on a sample of Iranian pharmacists attended in continuous education programs in 2010. Based on the pharmacists’ attitude toward common ethical problems, 9 Likert-type scale scenarios were designed. A thousand pharmacists were surveyed and 505 questionnaires were filled. For the whole questionnaire the strongly disagree answer was the most ethical answer. On a scale from 1–5 on which 5=strongly disagree, the total score of pharmacists ethical attitude was 17.69 ± 3.57. For easier analysis we considered the score of 1 for agree and strongly agree answers, score of 2 for neutral answers and score of 3 for disagree and strongly disagree answers. The total score in confidentiality for all participants was 4.15 ± 1.45 out of 9, in autonomy 6.25 ± 1.85 out of 9, in non-maleficence 5.14 ± 1.17 out of 6 and in justice was 2.27 ± 0.89 out of 3, however there was no significant difference between men and women in the total score and the score of each theme. The older participants (> 40 years) significantly had lower total score (P< 0.05) as well as the score of each theme (P< 0.05), except for non-maleficence. The work experience showed impact on the pharmacists’ attitude toward autonomy and the participants with more than 5 years work experience significantly obtained lower score in this theme. Compiling ethical guidelines and improving pharmacy ethics curriculum is highly critical to provide the best pharmaceutical care and to make clinical decisions in critical situations. Therefore further quantitative and qualitative investigations into finding pitfalls and challenges in this issue are highly recommended. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3714006/ /pubmed/23908747 Text en © 2011 Pooneh Salari Sharif, Mohammadreza Javadi and Fariba Asghari; licensee Tehran Univ. Med. Sci. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Articles
Sharif, Pooneh Salari
Javadi, Mohammadreza
Asghari, Fariba
Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
title Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
title_full Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
title_fullStr Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
title_short Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
title_sort pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908747
work_keys_str_mv AT sharifpoonehsalari pharmacyethicsevaluationpharmacistsethicalattitude
AT javadimohammadreza pharmacyethicsevaluationpharmacistsethicalattitude
AT asgharifariba pharmacyethicsevaluationpharmacistsethicalattitude