Cargando…

Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?

In African large herbivore assemblages, megaherbivores dominate the biomass and utilise the greatest share of available resources. Consequently, they are considered a separate trophic guild that structures the food niches of coexisting large herbivores. However, there exists little empirical evidenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landman, Marietjie, Schoeman, David S., Kerley, Graham I. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069771
_version_ 1782277329018421248
author Landman, Marietjie
Schoeman, David S.
Kerley, Graham I. H.
author_facet Landman, Marietjie
Schoeman, David S.
Kerley, Graham I. H.
author_sort Landman, Marietjie
collection PubMed
description In African large herbivore assemblages, megaherbivores dominate the biomass and utilise the greatest share of available resources. Consequently, they are considered a separate trophic guild that structures the food niches of coexisting large herbivores. However, there exists little empirical evidence on how food resources are shared within this guild, and none for direct competition for food between megaherbivores. Using the histological analysis of faeces, we explore this phenomenon for African elephant Loxodonta africana and black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis in the Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa, where the accumulated impacts of elephant have reduced browse availability. Despite being unable to generalise beyond our study sites, our observations support the predictions of competition theory (as opposed to optimality theory) by showing (1) a clear seasonal separation in resource use between these megaherbivores that increased as resource availability declined, and (2) rhinoceros changed their selectivity in the absence of elephant (using an adjacent site) by expanding and shifting their diet along the grass-browse continuum, and in relation to availability. Although black rhinoceros are generally considered strict browsers, the most significant shift in diet occurred as rhinoceros increased their preferences for grasses in the presence of elephant. We speculate that the lack of specialised grazing adaptations may increase foraging costs in rhinoceros, through reduced harvest- and handling-efficiencies of grasses. In the short-term, this may be off-set by an enhanced tolerance for low quality food and by seasonally mobilising fat reserves; however, the long-term fitness consequences require further study. Our data suggest that managing elephant at high densities may compromise the foraging opportunities of coexisting browsers. This may be particularly important in small, fenced areas and overlapping preferred habitats where impacts intensify.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3714249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37142492013-07-19 Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition? Landman, Marietjie Schoeman, David S. Kerley, Graham I. H. PLoS One Research Article In African large herbivore assemblages, megaherbivores dominate the biomass and utilise the greatest share of available resources. Consequently, they are considered a separate trophic guild that structures the food niches of coexisting large herbivores. However, there exists little empirical evidence on how food resources are shared within this guild, and none for direct competition for food between megaherbivores. Using the histological analysis of faeces, we explore this phenomenon for African elephant Loxodonta africana and black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis in the Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa, where the accumulated impacts of elephant have reduced browse availability. Despite being unable to generalise beyond our study sites, our observations support the predictions of competition theory (as opposed to optimality theory) by showing (1) a clear seasonal separation in resource use between these megaherbivores that increased as resource availability declined, and (2) rhinoceros changed their selectivity in the absence of elephant (using an adjacent site) by expanding and shifting their diet along the grass-browse continuum, and in relation to availability. Although black rhinoceros are generally considered strict browsers, the most significant shift in diet occurred as rhinoceros increased their preferences for grasses in the presence of elephant. We speculate that the lack of specialised grazing adaptations may increase foraging costs in rhinoceros, through reduced harvest- and handling-efficiencies of grasses. In the short-term, this may be off-set by an enhanced tolerance for low quality food and by seasonally mobilising fat reserves; however, the long-term fitness consequences require further study. Our data suggest that managing elephant at high densities may compromise the foraging opportunities of coexisting browsers. This may be particularly important in small, fenced areas and overlapping preferred habitats where impacts intensify. Public Library of Science 2013-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3714249/ /pubmed/23874997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069771 Text en © 2013 Landman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Landman, Marietjie
Schoeman, David S.
Kerley, Graham I. H.
Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?
title Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?
title_full Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?
title_fullStr Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?
title_full_unstemmed Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?
title_short Shift in Black Rhinoceros Diet in the Presence of Elephant: Evidence for Competition?
title_sort shift in black rhinoceros diet in the presence of elephant: evidence for competition?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069771
work_keys_str_mv AT landmanmarietjie shiftinblackrhinocerosdietinthepresenceofelephantevidenceforcompetition
AT schoemandavids shiftinblackrhinocerosdietinthepresenceofelephantevidenceforcompetition
AT kerleygrahamih shiftinblackrhinocerosdietinthepresenceofelephantevidenceforcompetition