Cargando…

Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: It has been postulated that prasugrel might be the preferred treatment option in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic action of ticagrelor versus prasugrel. RESEARCH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexopoulos, Dimitrios, Xanthopoulou, Ioanna, Mavronasiou, Eleni, Stavrou, Katerina, Siapika, Argyro, Tsoni, Evropi, Davlouros, Periklis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23491524
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2510
_version_ 1782277365772058624
author Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Mavronasiou, Eleni
Stavrou, Katerina
Siapika, Argyro
Tsoni, Evropi
Davlouros, Periklis
author_facet Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Mavronasiou, Eleni
Stavrou, Katerina
Siapika, Argyro
Tsoni, Evropi
Davlouros, Periklis
author_sort Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It has been postulated that prasugrel might be the preferred treatment option in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic action of ticagrelor versus prasugrel. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective, single-center, single-blind, crossover study, 30 consecutive ACS patients with DM who had been pretreated with clopidogrel were randomized to either 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily or 10 mg prasugrel once daily with a 15-day treatment period. Platelet reactivity (PR) was assessed with the VerifyNow P2Y12 function assay, measured in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). RESULTS: PR was significantly lower after ticagrelor (45.2 PRU [95% CI 27.4–63.1]) compared with prasugrel (80.8 PRU [63.0–98.7]), with a least squares mean difference of –35.6 PRU (−55.2 to −15.9, P = 0.001). High PR rate was 0% for ticagrelor and 3.3% for prasugrel (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In DM patients with ACS who had been pretreated with clopidogrel and who undergo PCI, ticagrelor achieves a significantly higher platelet inhibition than prasugrel. Both antiplatelet agents effectively treat high PR. The relevance of these findings to the clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in DM patients needs further elucidation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3714492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37144922014-08-01 Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes Alexopoulos, Dimitrios Xanthopoulou, Ioanna Mavronasiou, Eleni Stavrou, Katerina Siapika, Argyro Tsoni, Evropi Davlouros, Periklis Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: It has been postulated that prasugrel might be the preferred treatment option in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic action of ticagrelor versus prasugrel. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective, single-center, single-blind, crossover study, 30 consecutive ACS patients with DM who had been pretreated with clopidogrel were randomized to either 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily or 10 mg prasugrel once daily with a 15-day treatment period. Platelet reactivity (PR) was assessed with the VerifyNow P2Y12 function assay, measured in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). RESULTS: PR was significantly lower after ticagrelor (45.2 PRU [95% CI 27.4–63.1]) compared with prasugrel (80.8 PRU [63.0–98.7]), with a least squares mean difference of –35.6 PRU (−55.2 to −15.9, P = 0.001). High PR rate was 0% for ticagrelor and 3.3% for prasugrel (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In DM patients with ACS who had been pretreated with clopidogrel and who undergo PCI, ticagrelor achieves a significantly higher platelet inhibition than prasugrel. Both antiplatelet agents effectively treat high PR. The relevance of these findings to the clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in DM patients needs further elucidation. American Diabetes Association 2013-08 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3714492/ /pubmed/23491524 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2510 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
Mavronasiou, Eleni
Stavrou, Katerina
Siapika, Argyro
Tsoni, Evropi
Davlouros, Periklis
Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes
title Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes
title_full Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes
title_fullStr Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes
title_short Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients With Diabetes
title_sort randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with diabetes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23491524
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2510
work_keys_str_mv AT alexopoulosdimitrios randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes
AT xanthopoulouioanna randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes
AT mavronasioueleni randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes
AT stavroukaterina randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes
AT siapikaargyro randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes
AT tsonievropi randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes
AT davlourosperiklis randomizedassessmentofticagrelorversusprasugrelantiplateleteffectsinpatientswithdiabetes