Cargando…

Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)

OBJECTIVE: The epidemic of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) threatens to become the major public health problem of this century. However, a comprehensive comparison of the long-term effects of medications to treat T2DM has not been conducted. GRADE, a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial, aims to compare common...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nathan, David M., Buse, John B., Kahn, Steven E., Krause-Steinrauf, Heidi, Larkin, Mary E., Staten, Myrlene, Wexler, Deborah, Lachin, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0356
_version_ 1782277365999599616
author Nathan, David M.
Buse, John B.
Kahn, Steven E.
Krause-Steinrauf, Heidi
Larkin, Mary E.
Staten, Myrlene
Wexler, Deborah
Lachin, John M.
author_facet Nathan, David M.
Buse, John B.
Kahn, Steven E.
Krause-Steinrauf, Heidi
Larkin, Mary E.
Staten, Myrlene
Wexler, Deborah
Lachin, John M.
author_sort Nathan, David M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The epidemic of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) threatens to become the major public health problem of this century. However, a comprehensive comparison of the long-term effects of medications to treat T2DM has not been conducted. GRADE, a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial, aims to compare commonly used diabetes medications, when combined with metformin, on glycemia-lowering effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: GRADE was designed with support from a U34 planning grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The consensus protocol was approved by NIDDK and the GRADE Research Group. Eligibility criteria for the 5,000 metformin-treated subjects include <5 years' diabetes duration, ≥30 years of age at time of diagnosis, and baseline hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C) of 6.8–8.5% (51–69 mmol/mol). Medications representing four classes (sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and insulin) will be randomly assigned and added to metformin (minimum–maximum 1,000–2,000 mg/day). The primary metabolic outcome is the time to primary failure defined as an A1C ≥7% (53 mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, over an anticipated mean observation period of 4.8 years (range 4–7 years). Other long-term metabolic outcomes include the need for the addition of basal insulin after a confirmed A1C >7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and, ultimately, the need to implement an intensive basal/bolus insulin regimen. The four drugs will also be compared with respect to selected microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease risk factors, adverse effects, tolerability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: GRADE will compare the long-term effectiveness of major glycemia-lowering medications and provide guidance to clinicians about the most appropriate medications to treat T2DM. GRADE begins recruitment at 37 centers in the U.S. in 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3714493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37144932014-08-01 Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) Nathan, David M. Buse, John B. Kahn, Steven E. Krause-Steinrauf, Heidi Larkin, Mary E. Staten, Myrlene Wexler, Deborah Lachin, John M. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: The epidemic of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) threatens to become the major public health problem of this century. However, a comprehensive comparison of the long-term effects of medications to treat T2DM has not been conducted. GRADE, a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial, aims to compare commonly used diabetes medications, when combined with metformin, on glycemia-lowering effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: GRADE was designed with support from a U34 planning grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The consensus protocol was approved by NIDDK and the GRADE Research Group. Eligibility criteria for the 5,000 metformin-treated subjects include <5 years' diabetes duration, ≥30 years of age at time of diagnosis, and baseline hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C) of 6.8–8.5% (51–69 mmol/mol). Medications representing four classes (sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and insulin) will be randomly assigned and added to metformin (minimum–maximum 1,000–2,000 mg/day). The primary metabolic outcome is the time to primary failure defined as an A1C ≥7% (53 mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, over an anticipated mean observation period of 4.8 years (range 4–7 years). Other long-term metabolic outcomes include the need for the addition of basal insulin after a confirmed A1C >7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and, ultimately, the need to implement an intensive basal/bolus insulin regimen. The four drugs will also be compared with respect to selected microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease risk factors, adverse effects, tolerability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: GRADE will compare the long-term effectiveness of major glycemia-lowering medications and provide guidance to clinicians about the most appropriate medications to treat T2DM. GRADE begins recruitment at 37 centers in the U.S. in 2013. American Diabetes Association 2013-08 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3714493/ /pubmed/23690531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0356 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nathan, David M.
Buse, John B.
Kahn, Steven E.
Krause-Steinrauf, Heidi
Larkin, Mary E.
Staten, Myrlene
Wexler, Deborah
Lachin, John M.
Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
title Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
title_full Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
title_fullStr Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
title_short Rationale and Design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
title_sort rationale and design of the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: a comparative effectiveness study (grade)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3714493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23690531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0356
work_keys_str_mv AT nathandavidm rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT busejohnb rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT kahnstevene rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT krausesteinraufheidi rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT larkinmarye rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT statenmyrlene rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT wexlerdeborah rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT lachinjohnm rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade
AT rationaleanddesignoftheglycemiareductionapproachesindiabetesacomparativeeffectivenessstudygrade