Cargando…

Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods

Terrestrial laser scanners are sophisticated instruments that operate much like high-speed total stations. It has previously been shown that unmodelled systematic errors can exist in modern terrestrial laser scanners that deteriorate their geometric measurement precision and accuracy. Typically, sig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Jacky C. K., Lichti, Derek D., Glennie, Craig, Hartzell, Preston
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23727956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130607224
_version_ 1782277423736291328
author Chow, Jacky C. K.
Lichti, Derek D.
Glennie, Craig
Hartzell, Preston
author_facet Chow, Jacky C. K.
Lichti, Derek D.
Glennie, Craig
Hartzell, Preston
author_sort Chow, Jacky C. K.
collection PubMed
description Terrestrial laser scanners are sophisticated instruments that operate much like high-speed total stations. It has previously been shown that unmodelled systematic errors can exist in modern terrestrial laser scanners that deteriorate their geometric measurement precision and accuracy. Typically, signalised targets are used in point-based self-calibrations to identify and model the systematic errors. Although this method has proven its effectiveness, a large quantity of signalised targets is required and is therefore labour-intensive and limits its practicality. In recent years, feature-based self-calibration of aerial, mobile terrestrial, and static terrestrial laser scanning systems has been demonstrated. In this paper, the commonalities and differences between point-based and plane-based self-calibration (in terms of model identification and parameter correlation) are explored. The results of this research indicate that much of the knowledge from point-based self-calibration can be directly transferred to plane-based calibration and that the two calibration approaches are nearly equivalent. New network configurations, such as the inclusion of tilted scans, were also studied and prove to be an effective means for strengthening the self-calibration solution, and improved recoverability of the horizontal collimation axis error for hybrid scanners, which has always posed a challenge in the past.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3715238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37152382013-07-24 Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods Chow, Jacky C. K. Lichti, Derek D. Glennie, Craig Hartzell, Preston Sensors (Basel) Article Terrestrial laser scanners are sophisticated instruments that operate much like high-speed total stations. It has previously been shown that unmodelled systematic errors can exist in modern terrestrial laser scanners that deteriorate their geometric measurement precision and accuracy. Typically, signalised targets are used in point-based self-calibrations to identify and model the systematic errors. Although this method has proven its effectiveness, a large quantity of signalised targets is required and is therefore labour-intensive and limits its practicality. In recent years, feature-based self-calibration of aerial, mobile terrestrial, and static terrestrial laser scanning systems has been demonstrated. In this paper, the commonalities and differences between point-based and plane-based self-calibration (in terms of model identification and parameter correlation) are explored. The results of this research indicate that much of the knowledge from point-based self-calibration can be directly transferred to plane-based calibration and that the two calibration approaches are nearly equivalent. New network configurations, such as the inclusion of tilted scans, were also studied and prove to be an effective means for strengthening the self-calibration solution, and improved recoverability of the horizontal collimation axis error for hybrid scanners, which has always posed a challenge in the past. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3715238/ /pubmed/23727956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130607224 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chow, Jacky C. K.
Lichti, Derek D.
Glennie, Craig
Hartzell, Preston
Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods
title Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods
title_full Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods
title_fullStr Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods
title_full_unstemmed Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods
title_short Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods
title_sort improvements to and comparison of static terrestrial lidar self-calibration methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23727956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130607224
work_keys_str_mv AT chowjackyck improvementstoandcomparisonofstaticterrestriallidarselfcalibrationmethods
AT lichtiderekd improvementstoandcomparisonofstaticterrestriallidarselfcalibrationmethods
AT glenniecraig improvementstoandcomparisonofstaticterrestriallidarselfcalibrationmethods
AT hartzellpreston improvementstoandcomparisonofstaticterrestriallidarselfcalibrationmethods