Cargando…
Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale
Mechanical loads cause severe damage to perishable agricultural products. In order to quantify the mechanical impact during harvest and postharvest processes, several electronic fruits have been developed. The objective of the work described here was to compare on a laboratory scale different types...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23722827 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130607140 |
_version_ | 1782277430628581376 |
---|---|
author | Praeger, Ulrike Surdilovic, Jelena Truppel, Ingo Herold, Bernd Geyer, Martin |
author_facet | Praeger, Ulrike Surdilovic, Jelena Truppel, Ingo Herold, Bernd Geyer, Martin |
author_sort | Praeger, Ulrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mechanical loads cause severe damage to perishable agricultural products. In order to quantify the mechanical impact during harvest and postharvest processes, several electronic fruits have been developed. The objective of the work described here was to compare on a laboratory scale different types of impact acceleration recording electronic fruits: Mikras implanted in a real potato tuber as well as in a dummy tuber, IRD, Smart Spud and TuberLog. The acquisition of mechanical impacts was performed using a drop simulator with optional steel or PVC as impact material as well as a processing line simulator. Our results show that drops from 10 cm height on PVC caused similar peak accelerations of Mikras implanted in a real potato or a dummy, IRD and TuberLog. When dropped onto steel however, IRD, TuberLog and Mikras implanted in a dummy recorded higher peak values than Mikras in real potatoes. Impact on the flat side of a tuber led to higher peak values than impact on the apical region. This could be caused by different elastic compliance of synthetic materials as well as material thickness. Running through the processing line simulator TuberLog recorded the most impact; Smart Spud recorded a low number of impacts compared to the other electronic fruits. In all experiments the least sensitive measurements were recorded using Smart Spud. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3715268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37152682013-07-24 Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale Praeger, Ulrike Surdilovic, Jelena Truppel, Ingo Herold, Bernd Geyer, Martin Sensors (Basel) Article Mechanical loads cause severe damage to perishable agricultural products. In order to quantify the mechanical impact during harvest and postharvest processes, several electronic fruits have been developed. The objective of the work described here was to compare on a laboratory scale different types of impact acceleration recording electronic fruits: Mikras implanted in a real potato tuber as well as in a dummy tuber, IRD, Smart Spud and TuberLog. The acquisition of mechanical impacts was performed using a drop simulator with optional steel or PVC as impact material as well as a processing line simulator. Our results show that drops from 10 cm height on PVC caused similar peak accelerations of Mikras implanted in a real potato or a dummy, IRD and TuberLog. When dropped onto steel however, IRD, TuberLog and Mikras implanted in a dummy recorded higher peak values than Mikras in real potatoes. Impact on the flat side of a tuber led to higher peak values than impact on the apical region. This could be caused by different elastic compliance of synthetic materials as well as material thickness. Running through the processing line simulator TuberLog recorded the most impact; Smart Spud recorded a low number of impacts compared to the other electronic fruits. In all experiments the least sensitive measurements were recorded using Smart Spud. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3715268/ /pubmed/23722827 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130607140 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Praeger, Ulrike Surdilovic, Jelena Truppel, Ingo Herold, Bernd Geyer, Martin Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale |
title | Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale |
title_full | Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale |
title_short | Comparison of Electronic Fruits for Impact Detection on a Laboratory Scale |
title_sort | comparison of electronic fruits for impact detection on a laboratory scale |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23722827 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130607140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT praegerulrike comparisonofelectronicfruitsforimpactdetectiononalaboratoryscale AT surdilovicjelena comparisonofelectronicfruitsforimpactdetectiononalaboratoryscale AT truppelingo comparisonofelectronicfruitsforimpactdetectiononalaboratoryscale AT heroldbernd comparisonofelectronicfruitsforimpactdetectiononalaboratoryscale AT geyermartin comparisonofelectronicfruitsforimpactdetectiononalaboratoryscale |