Cargando…

Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing

We assessed soil fungal diversity and community structure at two sampling times (t1 = 47 days and t2 = 104 days of plant age) in pots associated with four maize cultivars, including two genetically modified (GM) cultivars by high-throughput pyrosequencing of the 18S rRNA gene using DNA and RNA templ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuramae, Eiko E., Verbruggen, Erik, Hillekens, Remy, de Hollander, Mattias, Röling, Wilfred F. M., van der Heijden, Marcel G. A., Kowalchuk, George A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23875012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069973
_version_ 1782277468415066112
author Kuramae, Eiko E.
Verbruggen, Erik
Hillekens, Remy
de Hollander, Mattias
Röling, Wilfred F. M.
van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
Kowalchuk, George A.
author_facet Kuramae, Eiko E.
Verbruggen, Erik
Hillekens, Remy
de Hollander, Mattias
Röling, Wilfred F. M.
van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
Kowalchuk, George A.
author_sort Kuramae, Eiko E.
collection PubMed
description We assessed soil fungal diversity and community structure at two sampling times (t1 = 47 days and t2 = 104 days of plant age) in pots associated with four maize cultivars, including two genetically modified (GM) cultivars by high-throughput pyrosequencing of the 18S rRNA gene using DNA and RNA templates. We detected no significant differences in soil fungal diversity and community structure associated with different plant cultivars. However, DNA-based analyses yielded lower fungal OTU richness as compared to RNA-based analyses. Clear differences in fungal community structure were also observed in relation to sampling time and the nucleic acid pool targeted (DNA versus RNA). The most abundant soil fungi, as recovered by DNA-based methods, did not necessary represent the most “active” fungi (as recovered via RNA). Interestingly, RNA-derived community compositions at t1 were highly similar to DNA-derived communities at t2, based on presence/absence measures of OTUs. We recovered large proportions of fungal sequences belonging to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Basidiomycota, especially at the RNA level, suggesting that these important and potentially beneficial fungi are not affected by the plant cultivars nor by GM traits (Bt toxin production). Our results suggest that even though DNA- and RNA-derived soil fungal communities can be very different at a given time, RNA composition may have a predictive power of fungal community development through time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3715498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37154982013-07-19 Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing Kuramae, Eiko E. Verbruggen, Erik Hillekens, Remy de Hollander, Mattias Röling, Wilfred F. M. van der Heijden, Marcel G. A. Kowalchuk, George A. PLoS One Research Article We assessed soil fungal diversity and community structure at two sampling times (t1 = 47 days and t2 = 104 days of plant age) in pots associated with four maize cultivars, including two genetically modified (GM) cultivars by high-throughput pyrosequencing of the 18S rRNA gene using DNA and RNA templates. We detected no significant differences in soil fungal diversity and community structure associated with different plant cultivars. However, DNA-based analyses yielded lower fungal OTU richness as compared to RNA-based analyses. Clear differences in fungal community structure were also observed in relation to sampling time and the nucleic acid pool targeted (DNA versus RNA). The most abundant soil fungi, as recovered by DNA-based methods, did not necessary represent the most “active” fungi (as recovered via RNA). Interestingly, RNA-derived community compositions at t1 were highly similar to DNA-derived communities at t2, based on presence/absence measures of OTUs. We recovered large proportions of fungal sequences belonging to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Basidiomycota, especially at the RNA level, suggesting that these important and potentially beneficial fungi are not affected by the plant cultivars nor by GM traits (Bt toxin production). Our results suggest that even though DNA- and RNA-derived soil fungal communities can be very different at a given time, RNA composition may have a predictive power of fungal community development through time. Public Library of Science 2013-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3715498/ /pubmed/23875012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069973 Text en © 2013 Kuramae et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuramae, Eiko E.
Verbruggen, Erik
Hillekens, Remy
de Hollander, Mattias
Röling, Wilfred F. M.
van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
Kowalchuk, George A.
Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing
title Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing
title_full Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing
title_fullStr Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing
title_full_unstemmed Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing
title_short Tracking Fungal Community Responses to Maize Plants by DNA- and RNA-Based Pyrosequencing
title_sort tracking fungal community responses to maize plants by dna- and rna-based pyrosequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23875012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069973
work_keys_str_mv AT kuramaeeikoe trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing
AT verbruggenerik trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing
AT hillekensremy trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing
AT dehollandermattias trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing
AT rolingwilfredfm trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing
AT vanderheijdenmarcelga trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing
AT kowalchukgeorgea trackingfungalcommunityresponsestomaizeplantsbydnaandrnabasedpyrosequencing