Cargando…

Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?

Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reichert, David P., Seriès, Peggy, Storkey, Amos J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134
_version_ 1782277476232200192
author Reichert, David P.
Seriès, Peggy
Storkey, Amos J.
author_facet Reichert, David P.
Seriès, Peggy
Storkey, Amos J.
author_sort Reichert, David P.
collection PubMed
description Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual hallucinations of objects, people, and whole scenes. CBS could be taken as indication that there is a generative model in the brain, specifically one that can synthesise rich, consistent visual representations even in the absence of actual visual input. The processes that lead to CBS are poorly understood. Here, we argue that a model recently introduced in machine learning, the deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), could capture the relevant aspects of (hypothetical) generative processing in the cortex. The DBM carries both the semantics of a probabilistic generative model and of a neural network. The latter allows us to model a concrete neural mechanism that could underlie CBS, namely, homeostatic regulation of neuronal activity. We show that homeostatic plasticity could serve to make the learnt internal model robust against e.g. degradation of sensory input, but overcompensate in the case of CBS, leading to hallucinations. We demonstrate how a wide range of features of CBS can be explained in the model and suggest a potential role for the neuromodulator acetylcholine. This work constitutes the first concrete computational model of CBS and the first application of the DBM as a model in computational neuroscience. Our results lend further credence to the hypothesis of a generative model in the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3715531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37155312013-07-19 Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex? Reichert, David P. Seriès, Peggy Storkey, Amos J. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual hallucinations of objects, people, and whole scenes. CBS could be taken as indication that there is a generative model in the brain, specifically one that can synthesise rich, consistent visual representations even in the absence of actual visual input. The processes that lead to CBS are poorly understood. Here, we argue that a model recently introduced in machine learning, the deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), could capture the relevant aspects of (hypothetical) generative processing in the cortex. The DBM carries both the semantics of a probabilistic generative model and of a neural network. The latter allows us to model a concrete neural mechanism that could underlie CBS, namely, homeostatic regulation of neuronal activity. We show that homeostatic plasticity could serve to make the learnt internal model robust against e.g. degradation of sensory input, but overcompensate in the case of CBS, leading to hallucinations. We demonstrate how a wide range of features of CBS can be explained in the model and suggest a potential role for the neuromodulator acetylcholine. This work constitutes the first concrete computational model of CBS and the first application of the DBM as a model in computational neuroscience. Our results lend further credence to the hypothesis of a generative model in the brain. Public Library of Science 2013-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3715531/ /pubmed/23874177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134 Text en © 2013 Reichert et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reichert, David P.
Seriès, Peggy
Storkey, Amos J.
Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?
title Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?
title_full Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?
title_fullStr Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?
title_full_unstemmed Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?
title_short Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex?
title_sort charles bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134
work_keys_str_mv AT reichertdavidp charlesbonnetsyndromeevidenceforagenerativemodelinthecortex
AT seriespeggy charlesbonnetsyndromeevidenceforagenerativemodelinthecortex
AT storkeyamosj charlesbonnetsyndromeevidenceforagenerativemodelinthecortex