Cargando…
Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
The right hemisphere has been shown to play a dominant role in processing of visuo-spatial information. Recently, this role has been studied in the two-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. In this task, two alphanumerical targets are embedded in left and right simultaneous streams of rapidl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00452 |
_version_ | 1782277495840571392 |
---|---|
author | Asanowicz, Dariusz Śmigasiewicz, Kamila Verleger, Rolf |
author_facet | Asanowicz, Dariusz Śmigasiewicz, Kamila Verleger, Rolf |
author_sort | Asanowicz, Dariusz |
collection | PubMed |
description | The right hemisphere has been shown to play a dominant role in processing of visuo-spatial information. Recently, this role has been studied in the two-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. In this task, two alphanumerical targets are embedded in left and right simultaneous streams of rapidly changing letters. The second target (T2) is identified better in the left than in the right visual field. This difference has been interpreted as advantage of the right hemisphere (RH). However, a disadvantage of the left hemisphere (LH) could not be excluded so far. The LH, specialized for processing of verbal stimuli, might be overloaded due to constant input of letters from both visual fields. In the present study, this overload hypothesis was tested by reducing demands on verbal processing (Experiment 1), and by overloading the RH with non-verbal stimuli: faces (Experiment 2) and irregular shapes (Experiment 3). The left visual field advantage proved to be largely independent from the level of verbal load and from stimulus type. Therefore, although not entirely disproving the overload hypothesis, these results suggest as the most parsimonious explanation this asymmetry reflects a RH advantage, presumably in perceptual and attentional processing, rather than a LH disadvantage caused by verbal overload. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3715728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37157282013-07-23 Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes Asanowicz, Dariusz Śmigasiewicz, Kamila Verleger, Rolf Front Psychol Psychology The right hemisphere has been shown to play a dominant role in processing of visuo-spatial information. Recently, this role has been studied in the two-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. In this task, two alphanumerical targets are embedded in left and right simultaneous streams of rapidly changing letters. The second target (T2) is identified better in the left than in the right visual field. This difference has been interpreted as advantage of the right hemisphere (RH). However, a disadvantage of the left hemisphere (LH) could not be excluded so far. The LH, specialized for processing of verbal stimuli, might be overloaded due to constant input of letters from both visual fields. In the present study, this overload hypothesis was tested by reducing demands on verbal processing (Experiment 1), and by overloading the RH with non-verbal stimuli: faces (Experiment 2) and irregular shapes (Experiment 3). The left visual field advantage proved to be largely independent from the level of verbal load and from stimulus type. Therefore, although not entirely disproving the overload hypothesis, these results suggest as the most parsimonious explanation this asymmetry reflects a RH advantage, presumably in perceptual and attentional processing, rather than a LH disadvantage caused by verbal overload. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3715728/ /pubmed/23882249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00452 Text en Copyright © 2013 Asanowicz, Śmigasiewicz and Verleger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Asanowicz, Dariusz Śmigasiewicz, Kamila Verleger, Rolf Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
title | Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
title_full | Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
title_fullStr | Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
title_short | Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
title_sort | differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asanowiczdariusz differencesbetweenvisualhemifieldsinidentifyingrapidlypresentedtargetstimulilettersanddigitsfacesandshapes AT smigasiewiczkamila differencesbetweenvisualhemifieldsinidentifyingrapidlypresentedtargetstimulilettersanddigitsfacesandshapes AT verlegerrolf differencesbetweenvisualhemifieldsinidentifyingrapidlypresentedtargetstimulilettersanddigitsfacesandshapes |