Cargando…

Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes

The right hemisphere has been shown to play a dominant role in processing of visuo-spatial information. Recently, this role has been studied in the two-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. In this task, two alphanumerical targets are embedded in left and right simultaneous streams of rapidl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asanowicz, Dariusz, Śmigasiewicz, Kamila, Verleger, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00452
_version_ 1782277495840571392
author Asanowicz, Dariusz
Śmigasiewicz, Kamila
Verleger, Rolf
author_facet Asanowicz, Dariusz
Śmigasiewicz, Kamila
Verleger, Rolf
author_sort Asanowicz, Dariusz
collection PubMed
description The right hemisphere has been shown to play a dominant role in processing of visuo-spatial information. Recently, this role has been studied in the two-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. In this task, two alphanumerical targets are embedded in left and right simultaneous streams of rapidly changing letters. The second target (T2) is identified better in the left than in the right visual field. This difference has been interpreted as advantage of the right hemisphere (RH). However, a disadvantage of the left hemisphere (LH) could not be excluded so far. The LH, specialized for processing of verbal stimuli, might be overloaded due to constant input of letters from both visual fields. In the present study, this overload hypothesis was tested by reducing demands on verbal processing (Experiment 1), and by overloading the RH with non-verbal stimuli: faces (Experiment 2) and irregular shapes (Experiment 3). The left visual field advantage proved to be largely independent from the level of verbal load and from stimulus type. Therefore, although not entirely disproving the overload hypothesis, these results suggest as the most parsimonious explanation this asymmetry reflects a RH advantage, presumably in perceptual and attentional processing, rather than a LH disadvantage caused by verbal overload.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3715728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37157282013-07-23 Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes Asanowicz, Dariusz Śmigasiewicz, Kamila Verleger, Rolf Front Psychol Psychology The right hemisphere has been shown to play a dominant role in processing of visuo-spatial information. Recently, this role has been studied in the two-stream rapid serial visual presentation task. In this task, two alphanumerical targets are embedded in left and right simultaneous streams of rapidly changing letters. The second target (T2) is identified better in the left than in the right visual field. This difference has been interpreted as advantage of the right hemisphere (RH). However, a disadvantage of the left hemisphere (LH) could not be excluded so far. The LH, specialized for processing of verbal stimuli, might be overloaded due to constant input of letters from both visual fields. In the present study, this overload hypothesis was tested by reducing demands on verbal processing (Experiment 1), and by overloading the RH with non-verbal stimuli: faces (Experiment 2) and irregular shapes (Experiment 3). The left visual field advantage proved to be largely independent from the level of verbal load and from stimulus type. Therefore, although not entirely disproving the overload hypothesis, these results suggest as the most parsimonious explanation this asymmetry reflects a RH advantage, presumably in perceptual and attentional processing, rather than a LH disadvantage caused by verbal overload. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3715728/ /pubmed/23882249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00452 Text en Copyright © 2013 Asanowicz, Śmigasiewicz and Verleger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Asanowicz, Dariusz
Śmigasiewicz, Kamila
Verleger, Rolf
Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
title Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
title_full Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
title_fullStr Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
title_full_unstemmed Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
title_short Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
title_sort differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00452
work_keys_str_mv AT asanowiczdariusz differencesbetweenvisualhemifieldsinidentifyingrapidlypresentedtargetstimulilettersanddigitsfacesandshapes
AT smigasiewiczkamila differencesbetweenvisualhemifieldsinidentifyingrapidlypresentedtargetstimulilettersanddigitsfacesandshapes
AT verlegerrolf differencesbetweenvisualhemifieldsinidentifyingrapidlypresentedtargetstimulilettersanddigitsfacesandshapes