Cargando…
Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience
The relation of selective attention to understanding of natural scenes has been subject to intense behavioral research and computational modeling, and gaze is often used as a proxy for such attention. The probability of an image region to be fixated typically correlates with its contrast. However, t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00455 |
_version_ | 1782277498589937664 |
---|---|
author | 't Hart, Bernard M. Schmidt, Hannah C. E. F. Roth, Christine Einhäuser, Wolfgang |
author_facet | 't Hart, Bernard M. Schmidt, Hannah C. E. F. Roth, Christine Einhäuser, Wolfgang |
author_sort | 't Hart, Bernard M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relation of selective attention to understanding of natural scenes has been subject to intense behavioral research and computational modeling, and gaze is often used as a proxy for such attention. The probability of an image region to be fixated typically correlates with its contrast. However, this relation does not imply a causal role of contrast. Rather, contrast may relate to an object's “importance” for a scene, which in turn drives attention. Here we operationalize importance by the probability that an observer names the object as characteristic for a scene. We modify luminance contrast of either a frequently named (“common”/“important”) or a rarely named (“rare”/“unimportant”) object, track the observers' eye movements during scene viewing and ask them to provide keywords describing the scene immediately after. When no object is modified relative to the background, important objects draw more fixations than unimportant ones. Increases of contrast make an object more likely to be fixated, irrespective of whether it was important for the original scene, while decreases in contrast have little effect on fixations. Any contrast modification makes originally unimportant objects more important for the scene. Finally, important objects are fixated more centrally than unimportant objects, irrespective of contrast. Our data suggest a dissociation between object importance (relevance for the scene) and salience (relevance for attention). If an object obeys natural scene statistics, important objects are also salient. However, when natural scene statistics are violated, importance and salience are differentially affected. Object salience is modulated by the expectation about object properties (e.g., formed by context or gist), and importance by the violation of such expectations. In addition, the dependence of fixated locations within an object on the object's importance suggests an analogy to the effects of word frequency on landing positions in reading. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3715740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37157402013-07-23 Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience 't Hart, Bernard M. Schmidt, Hannah C. E. F. Roth, Christine Einhäuser, Wolfgang Front Psychol Psychology The relation of selective attention to understanding of natural scenes has been subject to intense behavioral research and computational modeling, and gaze is often used as a proxy for such attention. The probability of an image region to be fixated typically correlates with its contrast. However, this relation does not imply a causal role of contrast. Rather, contrast may relate to an object's “importance” for a scene, which in turn drives attention. Here we operationalize importance by the probability that an observer names the object as characteristic for a scene. We modify luminance contrast of either a frequently named (“common”/“important”) or a rarely named (“rare”/“unimportant”) object, track the observers' eye movements during scene viewing and ask them to provide keywords describing the scene immediately after. When no object is modified relative to the background, important objects draw more fixations than unimportant ones. Increases of contrast make an object more likely to be fixated, irrespective of whether it was important for the original scene, while decreases in contrast have little effect on fixations. Any contrast modification makes originally unimportant objects more important for the scene. Finally, important objects are fixated more centrally than unimportant objects, irrespective of contrast. Our data suggest a dissociation between object importance (relevance for the scene) and salience (relevance for attention). If an object obeys natural scene statistics, important objects are also salient. However, when natural scene statistics are violated, importance and salience are differentially affected. Object salience is modulated by the expectation about object properties (e.g., formed by context or gist), and importance by the violation of such expectations. In addition, the dependence of fixated locations within an object on the object's importance suggests an analogy to the effects of word frequency on landing positions in reading. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3715740/ /pubmed/23882251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00455 Text en Copyright © 2013 't Hart, Schmidt, Roth and Einhäuser. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology 't Hart, Bernard M. Schmidt, Hannah C. E. F. Roth, Christine Einhäuser, Wolfgang Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
title | Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
title_full | Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
title_fullStr | Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
title_full_unstemmed | Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
title_short | Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
title_sort | fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thartbernardm fixationsonobjectsinnaturalscenesdissociatingimportancefromsalience AT schmidthannahcef fixationsonobjectsinnaturalscenesdissociatingimportancefromsalience AT rothchristine fixationsonobjectsinnaturalscenesdissociatingimportancefromsalience AT einhauserwolfgang fixationsonobjectsinnaturalscenesdissociatingimportancefromsalience |