Cargando…
Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23621809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.797314 |
_version_ | 1782277508577624064 |
---|---|
author | Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld |
author_facet | Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld |
author_sort | Barckman, Jeppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothesized that rinsing the bone graft may improve graft incorporation by removing the majority of immunogenic factors present in blood, marrow, and fat. METHODS: We implanted a cylindrical (10- × 6-mm) porous-coated Ti implant into each proximal tibia of 12 dogs. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized fresh frozen allograft bone was impacted. The bone graft was either (1) untreated or (2) rinsed in 37°C saline for 3 × 1 min. After 4 weeks, the animals were killed and implant fixation was evaluated by mechanical push-out and histomorphometry. RESULTS: The groups (rinsed vs. control) were similar regarding mechanical implant fixation (mean (SD)): shear strength (MPa) 2.7 (1.0) vs. 2.9 (1.2), stiffness (MPa/mm) 15 (6.7) vs. 15 (5.6), and energy absorption (kJ/m(2)) 0.5 (0.2) vs. 0.6 (0.4), The same was evident for the new bone formation on the implant surface and around the implant: ongrowth (%) 6 vs. 7 and ingrowth (%) 9 vs. 9. Although not statistically significant, a 61% reduction in fibrous tissue ongrowth and 50% reduction in ingrowth were found in the rinsed group. INTERPRETATION: Within the limits of this experimental model, we did not detect any benefits of rinsing morselized allograft bone prior to impaction grafting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3715820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37158202013-07-19 Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld Acta Orthop Implant Fixation BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothesized that rinsing the bone graft may improve graft incorporation by removing the majority of immunogenic factors present in blood, marrow, and fat. METHODS: We implanted a cylindrical (10- × 6-mm) porous-coated Ti implant into each proximal tibia of 12 dogs. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized fresh frozen allograft bone was impacted. The bone graft was either (1) untreated or (2) rinsed in 37°C saline for 3 × 1 min. After 4 weeks, the animals were killed and implant fixation was evaluated by mechanical push-out and histomorphometry. RESULTS: The groups (rinsed vs. control) were similar regarding mechanical implant fixation (mean (SD)): shear strength (MPa) 2.7 (1.0) vs. 2.9 (1.2), stiffness (MPa/mm) 15 (6.7) vs. 15 (5.6), and energy absorption (kJ/m(2)) 0.5 (0.2) vs. 0.6 (0.4), The same was evident for the new bone formation on the implant surface and around the implant: ongrowth (%) 6 vs. 7 and ingrowth (%) 9 vs. 9. Although not statistically significant, a 61% reduction in fibrous tissue ongrowth and 50% reduction in ingrowth were found in the rinsed group. INTERPRETATION: Within the limits of this experimental model, we did not detect any benefits of rinsing morselized allograft bone prior to impaction grafting. Informa Healthcare 2013-06 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3715820/ /pubmed/23621809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.797314 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Implant Fixation Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs |
title | Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs |
title_full | Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs |
title_fullStr | Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs |
title_short | Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs |
title_sort | rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: a study in 12 dogs |
topic | Implant Fixation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23621809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.797314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barckmanjeppe rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs AT baasjorgen rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs AT sørensenmette rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs AT bechtoldjoane rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs AT soballekjeld rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs |