Cargando…

Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barckman, Jeppe, Baas, Jorgen, Sørensen, Mette, Bechtold, Joan E, Soballe, Kjeld
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23621809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.797314
_version_ 1782277508577624064
author Barckman, Jeppe
Baas, Jorgen
Sørensen, Mette
Bechtold, Joan E
Soballe, Kjeld
author_facet Barckman, Jeppe
Baas, Jorgen
Sørensen, Mette
Bechtold, Joan E
Soballe, Kjeld
author_sort Barckman, Jeppe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothesized that rinsing the bone graft may improve graft incorporation by removing the majority of immunogenic factors present in blood, marrow, and fat. METHODS: We implanted a cylindrical (10- × 6-mm) porous-coated Ti implant into each proximal tibia of 12 dogs. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized fresh frozen allograft bone was impacted. The bone graft was either (1) untreated or (2) rinsed in 37°C saline for 3 × 1 min. After 4 weeks, the animals were killed and implant fixation was evaluated by mechanical push-out and histomorphometry. RESULTS: The groups (rinsed vs. control) were similar regarding mechanical implant fixation (mean (SD)): shear strength (MPa) 2.7 (1.0) vs. 2.9 (1.2), stiffness (MPa/mm) 15 (6.7) vs. 15 (5.6), and energy absorption (kJ/m(2)) 0.5 (0.2) vs. 0.6 (0.4), The same was evident for the new bone formation on the implant surface and around the implant: ongrowth (%) 6 vs. 7 and ingrowth (%) 9 vs. 9. Although not statistically significant, a 61% reduction in fibrous tissue ongrowth and 50% reduction in ingrowth were found in the rinsed group. INTERPRETATION: Within the limits of this experimental model, we did not detect any benefits of rinsing morselized allograft bone prior to impaction grafting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3715820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37158202013-07-19 Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld Acta Orthop Implant Fixation BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Impacted morselized allograft bone is a well-established method for reconstructing bone defects at revision surgery. However, the incorporation of bone graft is not always complete, and a substantial volume of fibrous tissue has been found around grafted implants. We hypothesized that rinsing the bone graft may improve graft incorporation by removing the majority of immunogenic factors present in blood, marrow, and fat. METHODS: We implanted a cylindrical (10- × 6-mm) porous-coated Ti implant into each proximal tibia of 12 dogs. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized fresh frozen allograft bone was impacted. The bone graft was either (1) untreated or (2) rinsed in 37°C saline for 3 × 1 min. After 4 weeks, the animals were killed and implant fixation was evaluated by mechanical push-out and histomorphometry. RESULTS: The groups (rinsed vs. control) were similar regarding mechanical implant fixation (mean (SD)): shear strength (MPa) 2.7 (1.0) vs. 2.9 (1.2), stiffness (MPa/mm) 15 (6.7) vs. 15 (5.6), and energy absorption (kJ/m(2)) 0.5 (0.2) vs. 0.6 (0.4), The same was evident for the new bone formation on the implant surface and around the implant: ongrowth (%) 6 vs. 7 and ingrowth (%) 9 vs. 9. Although not statistically significant, a 61% reduction in fibrous tissue ongrowth and 50% reduction in ingrowth were found in the rinsed group. INTERPRETATION: Within the limits of this experimental model, we did not detect any benefits of rinsing morselized allograft bone prior to impaction grafting. Informa Healthcare 2013-06 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3715820/ /pubmed/23621809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.797314 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Implant Fixation
Barckman, Jeppe
Baas, Jorgen
Sørensen, Mette
Bechtold, Joan E
Soballe, Kjeld
Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
title Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
title_full Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
title_fullStr Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
title_full_unstemmed Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
title_short Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: A study in 12 dogs
title_sort rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: a study in 12 dogs
topic Implant Fixation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23621809
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.797314
work_keys_str_mv AT barckmanjeppe rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs
AT baasjorgen rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs
AT sørensenmette rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs
AT bechtoldjoane rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs
AT soballekjeld rinsingofallograftbonedoesnotimproveimplantfixationastudyin12dogs