Cargando…
Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two-stage reconstruction, reimplantation after removal of an infected prosthesis, has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of infected hip arthroplasty. However, during the removal of a well-fixed femoral stem, the proximal femur can be damaged and a sequestr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23621807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.795830 |
_version_ | 1782277510157828096 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Young-Kyun Lee, Kee Haeng Nho, Jae-Hwi Ha, Yong-Chan Koo, Kyung-Hoi |
author_facet | Lee, Young-Kyun Lee, Kee Haeng Nho, Jae-Hwi Ha, Yong-Chan Koo, Kyung-Hoi |
author_sort | Lee, Young-Kyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two-stage reconstruction, reimplantation after removal of an infected prosthesis, has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of infected hip arthroplasty. However, during the removal of a well-fixed femoral stem, the proximal femur can be damaged and a sequestrum can be formed, which might lead to chronic osteomyelitis and difficulty in reimplantation. We wanted to determine whether infection after hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of a well-fixed stem. METHODS: We treated 19 patients who had an infection after hip replacement, but a well-fixed cementless stem, with 2-stage reconstruction. At the first stage, we removed the acetabular cup, the liner and the head, but not the stem. We then implanted a cup of cement spacer. After control of infection, we reimplanted the acetabular component and head. RESULTS: 2 patients did not undergo second-stage reconstruction because they were satisfied with the pain relief and the activity that they had with the cement-spacer implantation. The remaining 17 patients underwent the second-stage of the reconstruction using cementless arthroplasty. At a mean follow-up time of 4 (2–8) years, 15 of the patients had no recurrence of infection, with satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcome. INTERPRETATION: This second-stage reconstruction after retention of the stem could be an alternative treatment option for periprosthetic infection with a well-fixed stem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3715827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37158272013-07-19 Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years Lee, Young-Kyun Lee, Kee Haeng Nho, Jae-Hwi Ha, Yong-Chan Koo, Kyung-Hoi Acta Orthop Hip BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two-stage reconstruction, reimplantation after removal of an infected prosthesis, has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of infected hip arthroplasty. However, during the removal of a well-fixed femoral stem, the proximal femur can be damaged and a sequestrum can be formed, which might lead to chronic osteomyelitis and difficulty in reimplantation. We wanted to determine whether infection after hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of a well-fixed stem. METHODS: We treated 19 patients who had an infection after hip replacement, but a well-fixed cementless stem, with 2-stage reconstruction. At the first stage, we removed the acetabular cup, the liner and the head, but not the stem. We then implanted a cup of cement spacer. After control of infection, we reimplanted the acetabular component and head. RESULTS: 2 patients did not undergo second-stage reconstruction because they were satisfied with the pain relief and the activity that they had with the cement-spacer implantation. The remaining 17 patients underwent the second-stage of the reconstruction using cementless arthroplasty. At a mean follow-up time of 4 (2–8) years, 15 of the patients had no recurrence of infection, with satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcome. INTERPRETATION: This second-stage reconstruction after retention of the stem could be an alternative treatment option for periprosthetic infection with a well-fixed stem. Informa Healthcare 2013-06 2013-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3715827/ /pubmed/23621807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.795830 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Hip Lee, Young-Kyun Lee, Kee Haeng Nho, Jae-Hwi Ha, Yong-Chan Koo, Kyung-Hoi Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
title | Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
title_full | Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
title_fullStr | Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
title_short | Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: Good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
title_sort | retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty: good results in 19 patients followed for mean 4 years |
topic | Hip |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23621807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.795830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeyoungkyun retainingwellfixedcementlesssteminthetreatmentofinfectedhiparthroplastygoodresultsin19patientsfollowedformean4years AT leekeehaeng retainingwellfixedcementlesssteminthetreatmentofinfectedhiparthroplastygoodresultsin19patientsfollowedformean4years AT nhojaehwi retainingwellfixedcementlesssteminthetreatmentofinfectedhiparthroplastygoodresultsin19patientsfollowedformean4years AT hayongchan retainingwellfixedcementlesssteminthetreatmentofinfectedhiparthroplastygoodresultsin19patientsfollowedformean4years AT kookyunghoi retainingwellfixedcementlesssteminthetreatmentofinfectedhiparthroplastygoodresultsin19patientsfollowedformean4years |