Cargando…

Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck Squamous Cell Cancer (HNSCC) have poor prognosis with limited treatment options. In view of decimal prognosis, the treatment decision should include quality of life (QOL) issues, cost-effectiveness besides the response rates and surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anuradha, V., Anand, B. B., Suresh, A. V. S., Sinha, Sudha, Babu, S. Chinna, Suresh, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.113404
_version_ 1782277516197625856
author Anuradha, V.
Anand, B. B.
Suresh, A. V. S.
Sinha, Sudha
Babu, S. Chinna
Suresh, K.
author_facet Anuradha, V.
Anand, B. B.
Suresh, A. V. S.
Sinha, Sudha
Babu, S. Chinna
Suresh, K.
author_sort Anuradha, V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck Squamous Cell Cancer (HNSCC) have poor prognosis with limited treatment options. In view of decimal prognosis, the treatment decision should include quality of life (QOL) issues, cost-effectiveness besides the response rates and survival. AIM: Present retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate efficacy (disease-free survival), pharmacoeconomics, and toxicity profile of four (4) different regimens, viz. gefitinib alone, gefitinib with methotrexate, methotrexate alone, or 5-FU with cisplatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case records between 2007 September and 2008 September were analyzed, 68 patients were found suitable for analysis. Patients received gefitinib (250 mg/day), methotrexate as 50 mg intramuscular weekly or a combination of the same or 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days along with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 in 21-day cycle. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients received therapy. Fifty-one patients have clinically meaningful response (stable disease + complete + partial responses) (75%) and had symptomatic improvement. The median progression-free survival was significantly superior in responders (those who achieved partial or complete response) (8.4 months vs. 3.1 months, P=0.001). Methotrexate with gefitinib had maximum median survival and better overall QOL compared to the other treatment regimens. Weekly methotrexate is relatively cost-effective followed by methotrexate with gefitinib and gefitinib alone. 5-FU with cisplatin in our experience does not appear so attractive in view of high complication rates (when given in full doses) and prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this retrospective analysis, methotrexate weekly as single agent or in combination with gefitinib appears as an attractive alternative regimen for patients with metastatic HNSCC including those having poor performance status. A prospective study was planned and submitted to the local ethics committee based on above results to validate these results and compare methotrexate and gefitinib arm with 5-FU + cisplatin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3715971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37159712013-07-22 Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study Anuradha, V. Anand, B. B. Suresh, A. V. S. Sinha, Sudha Babu, S. Chinna Suresh, K. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck Squamous Cell Cancer (HNSCC) have poor prognosis with limited treatment options. In view of decimal prognosis, the treatment decision should include quality of life (QOL) issues, cost-effectiveness besides the response rates and survival. AIM: Present retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate efficacy (disease-free survival), pharmacoeconomics, and toxicity profile of four (4) different regimens, viz. gefitinib alone, gefitinib with methotrexate, methotrexate alone, or 5-FU with cisplatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case records between 2007 September and 2008 September were analyzed, 68 patients were found suitable for analysis. Patients received gefitinib (250 mg/day), methotrexate as 50 mg intramuscular weekly or a combination of the same or 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days along with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 in 21-day cycle. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients received therapy. Fifty-one patients have clinically meaningful response (stable disease + complete + partial responses) (75%) and had symptomatic improvement. The median progression-free survival was significantly superior in responders (those who achieved partial or complete response) (8.4 months vs. 3.1 months, P=0.001). Methotrexate with gefitinib had maximum median survival and better overall QOL compared to the other treatment regimens. Weekly methotrexate is relatively cost-effective followed by methotrexate with gefitinib and gefitinib alone. 5-FU with cisplatin in our experience does not appear so attractive in view of high complication rates (when given in full doses) and prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this retrospective analysis, methotrexate weekly as single agent or in combination with gefitinib appears as an attractive alternative regimen for patients with metastatic HNSCC including those having poor performance status. A prospective study was planned and submitted to the local ethics committee based on above results to validate these results and compare methotrexate and gefitinib arm with 5-FU + cisplatin. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3715971/ /pubmed/23878480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.113404 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anuradha, V.
Anand, B. B.
Suresh, A. V. S.
Sinha, Sudha
Babu, S. Chinna
Suresh, K.
Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
title Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
title_full Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
title_fullStr Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
title_full_unstemmed Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
title_short Palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - What is best in Indian population? A time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
title_sort palliative chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer - what is best in indian population? a time without symptoms, treatment toxicity score based study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.113404
work_keys_str_mv AT anuradhav palliativechemotherapyinheadandnecksquamouscellcancerwhatisbestinindianpopulationatimewithoutsymptomstreatmenttoxicityscorebasedstudy
AT anandbb palliativechemotherapyinheadandnecksquamouscellcancerwhatisbestinindianpopulationatimewithoutsymptomstreatmenttoxicityscorebasedstudy
AT sureshavs palliativechemotherapyinheadandnecksquamouscellcancerwhatisbestinindianpopulationatimewithoutsymptomstreatmenttoxicityscorebasedstudy
AT sinhasudha palliativechemotherapyinheadandnecksquamouscellcancerwhatisbestinindianpopulationatimewithoutsymptomstreatmenttoxicityscorebasedstudy
AT babuschinna palliativechemotherapyinheadandnecksquamouscellcancerwhatisbestinindianpopulationatimewithoutsymptomstreatmenttoxicityscorebasedstudy
AT sureshk palliativechemotherapyinheadandnecksquamouscellcancerwhatisbestinindianpopulationatimewithoutsymptomstreatmenttoxicityscorebasedstudy