Cargando…

Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function

PURPOSE: This paper examines the influence of age on several attributes of sensorimotor performance while performing a reaching task. Our hypothesis, based on previous studies, is that aged persons will show differences in one or more of the attributes of sensorimotor performance. PATIENTS AND METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LLinares, Ana, Badesa, Francisco Javier, Morales, Ricardo, Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas, Sabater, JM, Fernandez, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885170
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45900
_version_ 1782277538736766976
author LLinares, Ana
Badesa, Francisco Javier
Morales, Ricardo
Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas
Sabater, JM
Fernandez, Eduardo
author_facet LLinares, Ana
Badesa, Francisco Javier
Morales, Ricardo
Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas
Sabater, JM
Fernandez, Eduardo
author_sort LLinares, Ana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This paper examines the influence of age on several attributes of sensorimotor performance while performing a reaching task. Our hypothesis, based on previous studies, is that aged persons will show differences in one or more of the attributes of sensorimotor performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one subjects (aged 20–80 years) with no known neuromotor disorders of the upper limbs participated in the study. Subjects were asked to grasp the end-effector of a pneumatic robotic device with two degrees of freedom in order to reach peripheral targets (1.0 cm radius), “quickly and accurately”, from a centrally located target (1.0 cm radius). Subjects began each trial by holding the hand within the central target for 2000 milliseconds. Afterwards, a peripheral target was illuminated. Then participants were given 3000 milliseconds to complete the movement. When a target was reached, the participant had to return to the central target in order to start a new trial. A total of 64 trials were completed and each peripheral target was illuminated in a random block design. RESULTS: Subjects were divided into three groups according to age: group 1 (age 20–40 years), group 2 (age 41–60 years), and group 3 (age 61–80 years). The Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups, except for the variables postural speed in the dominant arm, and postural speed and initial deviation in the non-dominant arm (P > 0.05). These results suggest that age introduces significant differences in upper-limb motor function. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that there are objective differences in sensorimotor function due to age, and that these differences are greater for the dominant arm. Therefore for the assessment of upper-limb function, we should take into account the influence of age. Moreover, these results suggest that robotic systems can provide a new and effective approach in the assessment of sensorimotor function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3716446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37164462013-07-24 Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function LLinares, Ana Badesa, Francisco Javier Morales, Ricardo Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas Sabater, JM Fernandez, Eduardo Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: This paper examines the influence of age on several attributes of sensorimotor performance while performing a reaching task. Our hypothesis, based on previous studies, is that aged persons will show differences in one or more of the attributes of sensorimotor performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one subjects (aged 20–80 years) with no known neuromotor disorders of the upper limbs participated in the study. Subjects were asked to grasp the end-effector of a pneumatic robotic device with two degrees of freedom in order to reach peripheral targets (1.0 cm radius), “quickly and accurately”, from a centrally located target (1.0 cm radius). Subjects began each trial by holding the hand within the central target for 2000 milliseconds. Afterwards, a peripheral target was illuminated. Then participants were given 3000 milliseconds to complete the movement. When a target was reached, the participant had to return to the central target in order to start a new trial. A total of 64 trials were completed and each peripheral target was illuminated in a random block design. RESULTS: Subjects were divided into three groups according to age: group 1 (age 20–40 years), group 2 (age 41–60 years), and group 3 (age 61–80 years). The Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups, except for the variables postural speed in the dominant arm, and postural speed and initial deviation in the non-dominant arm (P > 0.05). These results suggest that age introduces significant differences in upper-limb motor function. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that there are objective differences in sensorimotor function due to age, and that these differences are greater for the dominant arm. Therefore for the assessment of upper-limb function, we should take into account the influence of age. Moreover, these results suggest that robotic systems can provide a new and effective approach in the assessment of sensorimotor function. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3716446/ /pubmed/23885170 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45900 Text en © 2013 LLinares et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
LLinares, Ana
Badesa, Francisco Javier
Morales, Ricardo
Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas
Sabater, JM
Fernandez, Eduardo
Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
title Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
title_full Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
title_fullStr Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
title_full_unstemmed Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
title_short Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
title_sort robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885170
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45900
work_keys_str_mv AT llinaresana roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction
AT badesafranciscojavier roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction
AT moralesricardo roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction
AT garciaaracilnicolas roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction
AT sabaterjm roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction
AT fernandezeduardo roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction