Cargando…
Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function
PURPOSE: This paper examines the influence of age on several attributes of sensorimotor performance while performing a reaching task. Our hypothesis, based on previous studies, is that aged persons will show differences in one or more of the attributes of sensorimotor performance. PATIENTS AND METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885170 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45900 |
_version_ | 1782277538736766976 |
---|---|
author | LLinares, Ana Badesa, Francisco Javier Morales, Ricardo Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas Sabater, JM Fernandez, Eduardo |
author_facet | LLinares, Ana Badesa, Francisco Javier Morales, Ricardo Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas Sabater, JM Fernandez, Eduardo |
author_sort | LLinares, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This paper examines the influence of age on several attributes of sensorimotor performance while performing a reaching task. Our hypothesis, based on previous studies, is that aged persons will show differences in one or more of the attributes of sensorimotor performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one subjects (aged 20–80 years) with no known neuromotor disorders of the upper limbs participated in the study. Subjects were asked to grasp the end-effector of a pneumatic robotic device with two degrees of freedom in order to reach peripheral targets (1.0 cm radius), “quickly and accurately”, from a centrally located target (1.0 cm radius). Subjects began each trial by holding the hand within the central target for 2000 milliseconds. Afterwards, a peripheral target was illuminated. Then participants were given 3000 milliseconds to complete the movement. When a target was reached, the participant had to return to the central target in order to start a new trial. A total of 64 trials were completed and each peripheral target was illuminated in a random block design. RESULTS: Subjects were divided into three groups according to age: group 1 (age 20–40 years), group 2 (age 41–60 years), and group 3 (age 61–80 years). The Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups, except for the variables postural speed in the dominant arm, and postural speed and initial deviation in the non-dominant arm (P > 0.05). These results suggest that age introduces significant differences in upper-limb motor function. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that there are objective differences in sensorimotor function due to age, and that these differences are greater for the dominant arm. Therefore for the assessment of upper-limb function, we should take into account the influence of age. Moreover, these results suggest that robotic systems can provide a new and effective approach in the assessment of sensorimotor function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3716446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37164462013-07-24 Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function LLinares, Ana Badesa, Francisco Javier Morales, Ricardo Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas Sabater, JM Fernandez, Eduardo Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: This paper examines the influence of age on several attributes of sensorimotor performance while performing a reaching task. Our hypothesis, based on previous studies, is that aged persons will show differences in one or more of the attributes of sensorimotor performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one subjects (aged 20–80 years) with no known neuromotor disorders of the upper limbs participated in the study. Subjects were asked to grasp the end-effector of a pneumatic robotic device with two degrees of freedom in order to reach peripheral targets (1.0 cm radius), “quickly and accurately”, from a centrally located target (1.0 cm radius). Subjects began each trial by holding the hand within the central target for 2000 milliseconds. Afterwards, a peripheral target was illuminated. Then participants were given 3000 milliseconds to complete the movement. When a target was reached, the participant had to return to the central target in order to start a new trial. A total of 64 trials were completed and each peripheral target was illuminated in a random block design. RESULTS: Subjects were divided into three groups according to age: group 1 (age 20–40 years), group 2 (age 41–60 years), and group 3 (age 61–80 years). The Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups, except for the variables postural speed in the dominant arm, and postural speed and initial deviation in the non-dominant arm (P > 0.05). These results suggest that age introduces significant differences in upper-limb motor function. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that there are objective differences in sensorimotor function due to age, and that these differences are greater for the dominant arm. Therefore for the assessment of upper-limb function, we should take into account the influence of age. Moreover, these results suggest that robotic systems can provide a new and effective approach in the assessment of sensorimotor function. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3716446/ /pubmed/23885170 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45900 Text en © 2013 LLinares et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research LLinares, Ana Badesa, Francisco Javier Morales, Ricardo Garcia-Aracil, Nicolas Sabater, JM Fernandez, Eduardo Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
title | Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
title_full | Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
title_fullStr | Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
title_short | Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
title_sort | robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885170 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT llinaresana roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction AT badesafranciscojavier roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction AT moralesricardo roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction AT garciaaracilnicolas roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction AT sabaterjm roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction AT fernandezeduardo roboticassessmentoftheinfluenceofageonupperlimbsensorimotorfunction |