Cargando…

Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a modified UKPDS risk engine in order to establish a risk prediction benchmark for the general diabetes population. METHODS: Data sources were summary demographic and risk factor data from the major type 2 diabetes mellitus outcomes studies, includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Fred, Ye, June, Pomerantz, Kenneth, Stewart, Murray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885178
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S43724
_version_ 1782277538954870784
author Yang, Fred
Ye, June
Pomerantz, Kenneth
Stewart, Murray
author_facet Yang, Fred
Ye, June
Pomerantz, Kenneth
Stewart, Murray
author_sort Yang, Fred
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a modified UKPDS risk engine in order to establish a risk prediction benchmark for the general diabetes population. METHODS: Data sources were summary demographic and risk factor data from the major type 2 diabetes mellitus outcomes studies, including ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, RECORD, PROactive, ADOPT, and BARI 2D. Patients in these studies spanned a wide spectrum of disease, from drug-naïve to insulin-dependent. Cardiovascular events/major adverse coronary events (CVE/MACE) were primary or safety end points. Overall observed rates for cardiovascular events/MACE were summarized, and the observed annualized event rates were calculated using linear approximation. Simulation studies were then conducted using original (cardiovascular history excluded) and modified (cardiovascular history included) United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) models; the predicted event rates were then compared with the observed event rates for all studies. The consistency of the predicted rates derived from each model was then evaluated using descriptive statistics and linear regression. RESULTS: The original UKPDS model tended to overestimate event rates across studies. The ratio of predicted events versus observed MACE ranged from 0.9 to 2.0, with mean of 1.5 ± 0.4 and a coefficient of variation of 26% (R(2) = 0.80). However, cardiovascular risk predictions were more precise using a modified UKPDS model; the ratio of predicted versus observed MACE events ranged from 1.8 to 2.4, with a mean of 2.1 ± 0.25 and a coefficient of variation of 13% (R(2) = 0.94). CONCLUSION: A modified UKPDS model which includes adjustments for prior cardiovascular history has the potential for use as a tool for benchmarking and may be useful for predicting cardiovascular rates in clinical studies. This modification could be further evaluated, recalibrated, and validated using patient-level information derived from prospective clinical studies to yield greater predictability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3716447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37164472013-07-24 Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials Yang, Fred Ye, June Pomerantz, Kenneth Stewart, Murray Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a modified UKPDS risk engine in order to establish a risk prediction benchmark for the general diabetes population. METHODS: Data sources were summary demographic and risk factor data from the major type 2 diabetes mellitus outcomes studies, including ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, RECORD, PROactive, ADOPT, and BARI 2D. Patients in these studies spanned a wide spectrum of disease, from drug-naïve to insulin-dependent. Cardiovascular events/major adverse coronary events (CVE/MACE) were primary or safety end points. Overall observed rates for cardiovascular events/MACE were summarized, and the observed annualized event rates were calculated using linear approximation. Simulation studies were then conducted using original (cardiovascular history excluded) and modified (cardiovascular history included) United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) models; the predicted event rates were then compared with the observed event rates for all studies. The consistency of the predicted rates derived from each model was then evaluated using descriptive statistics and linear regression. RESULTS: The original UKPDS model tended to overestimate event rates across studies. The ratio of predicted events versus observed MACE ranged from 0.9 to 2.0, with mean of 1.5 ± 0.4 and a coefficient of variation of 26% (R(2) = 0.80). However, cardiovascular risk predictions were more precise using a modified UKPDS model; the ratio of predicted versus observed MACE events ranged from 1.8 to 2.4, with a mean of 2.1 ± 0.25 and a coefficient of variation of 13% (R(2) = 0.94). CONCLUSION: A modified UKPDS model which includes adjustments for prior cardiovascular history has the potential for use as a tool for benchmarking and may be useful for predicting cardiovascular rates in clinical studies. This modification could be further evaluated, recalibrated, and validated using patient-level information derived from prospective clinical studies to yield greater predictability. Dove Medical Press 2013-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3716447/ /pubmed/23885178 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S43724 Text en © 2013 Yang et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Fred
Ye, June
Pomerantz, Kenneth
Stewart, Murray
Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
title Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
title_full Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
title_fullStr Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
title_short Potential modification of the UKPDS risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
title_sort potential modification of the ukpds risk engine and evaluation of macrovascular event rates in controlled clinical trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23885178
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S43724
work_keys_str_mv AT yangfred potentialmodificationoftheukpdsriskengineandevaluationofmacrovasculareventratesincontrolledclinicaltrials
AT yejune potentialmodificationoftheukpdsriskengineandevaluationofmacrovasculareventratesincontrolledclinicaltrials
AT pomerantzkenneth potentialmodificationoftheukpdsriskengineandevaluationofmacrovasculareventratesincontrolledclinicaltrials
AT stewartmurray potentialmodificationoftheukpdsriskengineandevaluationofmacrovasculareventratesincontrolledclinicaltrials