Cargando…
The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that treatments that solely addressed intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration were not very effective in reducing IPV, possibly due to neglecting individual differences between IPV perpetrators. A large proportion of IPV perpetrators is diagnosed with co-occurring...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-189 |
_version_ | 1782277626380943360 |
---|---|
author | Kraanen, Fleur L Vedel, Ellen Scholing, Agnes Emmelkamp, Paul MG |
author_facet | Kraanen, Fleur L Vedel, Ellen Scholing, Agnes Emmelkamp, Paul MG |
author_sort | Kraanen, Fleur L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research has shown that treatments that solely addressed intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration were not very effective in reducing IPV, possibly due to neglecting individual differences between IPV perpetrators. A large proportion of IPV perpetrators is diagnosed with co-occurring substance use disorders and it has been demonstrated that successful treatment of alcohol dependence among alcohol dependent IPV perpetrators also led to less IPV. The current study investigated the relative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) to cognitive behavioral treatment addressing substance use disorders including only one session addressing partner violence (CBT-SUD+) among patients in substance abuse treatment who repeatedly committed IPV. Substance use and IPV perpetration were primary outcome measures. METHOD: Patients who entered substance abuse treatment were screened for IPV. Patients who disclosed at least 7 acts of physical IPV in the past year (N = 52) were randomly assigned to either I-StoP or CBT-SUD+. Patients in both conditions received 16 treatment sessions. Substance use and IPV perpetration were assessed at pretreatment, halfway treatment and posttreatment in blocks of 8 weeks. Both completers and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients (completers and ITT) in both conditions significantly improved regarding substance use and IPV perpetration at posttreatment compared with pretreatment. There were no differences in outcome between conditions. Completers in both conditions almost fully abstained from IPV in 8 weeks before the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both I-StoP and CBT-SUD+ were effective in reducing substance use and IPV perpetration among patients in substance abuse treatment who repeatedly committed IPV and self-disclosed IPV perpetration. Since it is more cost and time-effective to implement CBT-SUD+ than I-StoP, it is suggested to treat IPV perpetrators in substance abuse treatment with CBT-SUD+. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00847873 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3716952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37169522013-07-21 The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial Kraanen, Fleur L Vedel, Ellen Scholing, Agnes Emmelkamp, Paul MG BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Research has shown that treatments that solely addressed intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration were not very effective in reducing IPV, possibly due to neglecting individual differences between IPV perpetrators. A large proportion of IPV perpetrators is diagnosed with co-occurring substance use disorders and it has been demonstrated that successful treatment of alcohol dependence among alcohol dependent IPV perpetrators also led to less IPV. The current study investigated the relative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) to cognitive behavioral treatment addressing substance use disorders including only one session addressing partner violence (CBT-SUD+) among patients in substance abuse treatment who repeatedly committed IPV. Substance use and IPV perpetration were primary outcome measures. METHOD: Patients who entered substance abuse treatment were screened for IPV. Patients who disclosed at least 7 acts of physical IPV in the past year (N = 52) were randomly assigned to either I-StoP or CBT-SUD+. Patients in both conditions received 16 treatment sessions. Substance use and IPV perpetration were assessed at pretreatment, halfway treatment and posttreatment in blocks of 8 weeks. Both completers and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients (completers and ITT) in both conditions significantly improved regarding substance use and IPV perpetration at posttreatment compared with pretreatment. There were no differences in outcome between conditions. Completers in both conditions almost fully abstained from IPV in 8 weeks before the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both I-StoP and CBT-SUD+ were effective in reducing substance use and IPV perpetration among patients in substance abuse treatment who repeatedly committed IPV and self-disclosed IPV perpetration. Since it is more cost and time-effective to implement CBT-SUD+ than I-StoP, it is suggested to treat IPV perpetrators in substance abuse treatment with CBT-SUD+. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00847873 BioMed Central 2013-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3716952/ /pubmed/24059784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-189 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kraanen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kraanen, Fleur L Vedel, Ellen Scholing, Agnes Emmelkamp, Paul MG The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The comparative effectiveness of Integrated treatment for Substance abuse and Partner violence (I-StoP) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of integrated treatment for substance abuse and partner violence (i-stop) and substance abuse treatment alone: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24059784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kraanenfleurl thecomparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vedelellen thecomparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scholingagnes thecomparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT emmelkamppaulmg thecomparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kraanenfleurl comparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vedelellen comparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scholingagnes comparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT emmelkamppaulmg comparativeeffectivenessofintegratedtreatmentforsubstanceabuseandpartnerviolenceistopandsubstanceabusetreatmentalonearandomizedcontrolledtrial |