Cargando…

'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Unexpected obstetric emergencies threaten the safety of pregnant women. As emergencies are rare, they are difficult to learn. Therefore, simulation-based medical education (SBME) seems relevant. In non-systematic reviews on SBME, medical simulation has been suggested to be associated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sørensen, Jette Led, Van der Vleuten, Cees, Lindschou, Jane, Gluud, Christian, Østergaard, Doris, LeBlanc, Vicki, Johansen, Marianne, Ekelund, Kim, Albrechtsen, Charlotte Krebs, Pedersen, Berit Woetman, Kjærgaard, Hanne, Weikop, Pia, Ottesen, Bent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-220
_version_ 1782277630672764928
author Sørensen, Jette Led
Van der Vleuten, Cees
Lindschou, Jane
Gluud, Christian
Østergaard, Doris
LeBlanc, Vicki
Johansen, Marianne
Ekelund, Kim
Albrechtsen, Charlotte Krebs
Pedersen, Berit Woetman
Kjærgaard, Hanne
Weikop, Pia
Ottesen, Bent
author_facet Sørensen, Jette Led
Van der Vleuten, Cees
Lindschou, Jane
Gluud, Christian
Østergaard, Doris
LeBlanc, Vicki
Johansen, Marianne
Ekelund, Kim
Albrechtsen, Charlotte Krebs
Pedersen, Berit Woetman
Kjærgaard, Hanne
Weikop, Pia
Ottesen, Bent
author_sort Sørensen, Jette Led
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unexpected obstetric emergencies threaten the safety of pregnant women. As emergencies are rare, they are difficult to learn. Therefore, simulation-based medical education (SBME) seems relevant. In non-systematic reviews on SBME, medical simulation has been suggested to be associated with improved learner outcomes. However, many questions on how SBME can be optimized remain unanswered. One unresolved issue is how 'in situ simulation' (ISS) versus 'off site simulation' (OSS) impact learning. ISS means simulation-based training in the actual patient care unit (in other words, the labor room and operating room). OSS means training in facilities away from the actual patient care unit, either at a simulation centre or in hospital rooms that have been set up for this purpose. METHODS AND DESIGN: The objective of this randomized trial is to study the effect of ISS versus OSS on individual learning outcome, safety attitude, motivation, stress, and team performance amongst multi-professional obstetric-anesthesia teams. The trial is a single-centre randomized superiority trial including 100 participants. The inclusion criteria were health-care professionals employed at the department of obstetrics or anesthesia at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, who were working on shifts and gave written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were managers with staff responsibilities, and staff who were actively taking part in preparation of the trial. The same obstetric multi-professional training was conducted in the two simulation settings. The experimental group was exposed to training in the ISS setting, and the control group in the OSS setting. The primary outcome is the individual score on a knowledge test. Exploratory outcomes are individual scores on a safety attitudes questionnaire, a stress inventory, salivary cortisol levels, an intrinsic motivation inventory, results from a questionnaire evaluating perceptions of the simulation and suggested changes needed in the organization, a team-based score on video-assessed team performance and on selected clinical performance. DISCUSSION: The perspective is to provide new knowledge on contextual effects of different simulation settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov NCT01792674.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3716971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37169712013-07-21 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Sørensen, Jette Led Van der Vleuten, Cees Lindschou, Jane Gluud, Christian Østergaard, Doris LeBlanc, Vicki Johansen, Marianne Ekelund, Kim Albrechtsen, Charlotte Krebs Pedersen, Berit Woetman Kjærgaard, Hanne Weikop, Pia Ottesen, Bent Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Unexpected obstetric emergencies threaten the safety of pregnant women. As emergencies are rare, they are difficult to learn. Therefore, simulation-based medical education (SBME) seems relevant. In non-systematic reviews on SBME, medical simulation has been suggested to be associated with improved learner outcomes. However, many questions on how SBME can be optimized remain unanswered. One unresolved issue is how 'in situ simulation' (ISS) versus 'off site simulation' (OSS) impact learning. ISS means simulation-based training in the actual patient care unit (in other words, the labor room and operating room). OSS means training in facilities away from the actual patient care unit, either at a simulation centre or in hospital rooms that have been set up for this purpose. METHODS AND DESIGN: The objective of this randomized trial is to study the effect of ISS versus OSS on individual learning outcome, safety attitude, motivation, stress, and team performance amongst multi-professional obstetric-anesthesia teams. The trial is a single-centre randomized superiority trial including 100 participants. The inclusion criteria were health-care professionals employed at the department of obstetrics or anesthesia at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, who were working on shifts and gave written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were managers with staff responsibilities, and staff who were actively taking part in preparation of the trial. The same obstetric multi-professional training was conducted in the two simulation settings. The experimental group was exposed to training in the ISS setting, and the control group in the OSS setting. The primary outcome is the individual score on a knowledge test. Exploratory outcomes are individual scores on a safety attitudes questionnaire, a stress inventory, salivary cortisol levels, an intrinsic motivation inventory, results from a questionnaire evaluating perceptions of the simulation and suggested changes needed in the organization, a team-based score on video-assessed team performance and on selected clinical performance. DISCUSSION: The perspective is to provide new knowledge on contextual effects of different simulation settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincialTrials.gov NCT01792674. BioMed Central 2013-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3716971/ /pubmed/23870501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-220 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sørensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sørensen, Jette Led
Van der Vleuten, Cees
Lindschou, Jane
Gluud, Christian
Østergaard, Doris
LeBlanc, Vicki
Johansen, Marianne
Ekelund, Kim
Albrechtsen, Charlotte Krebs
Pedersen, Berit Woetman
Kjærgaard, Hanne
Weikop, Pia
Ottesen, Bent
'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort 'in situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23870501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-220
work_keys_str_mv AT sørensenjetteled insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandervleutencees insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lindschoujane insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gluudchristian insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT østergaarddoris insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leblancvicki insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT johansenmarianne insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ekelundkim insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT albrechtsencharlottekrebs insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedersenberitwoetman insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kjærgaardhanne insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weikoppia insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ottesenbent insitusimulationversusoffsitesimulationinobstetricemergenciesandtheireffectonknowledgesafetyattitudesteamperformancestressandmotivationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial