Cargando…

A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women

BACKGROUND: Despite high obesity prevalence rates, few low-income midlife women participate in weight loss maintenance trials. This pilot study aims to assess the effectiveness of two weight loss maintenance interventions in this under-represented population. METHODS: Low-income midlife women who co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D, Johnston, Larry F, Gizlice, Ziya, Garcia, Beverly A, Lindsley, Sara C, Gold, Alison D, Braxton, Danielle F, Keyserling, Thomas C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23855318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-653
_version_ 1782277643877482496
author Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D
Johnston, Larry F
Gizlice, Ziya
Garcia, Beverly A
Lindsley, Sara C
Gold, Alison D
Braxton, Danielle F
Keyserling, Thomas C
author_facet Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D
Johnston, Larry F
Gizlice, Ziya
Garcia, Beverly A
Lindsley, Sara C
Gold, Alison D
Braxton, Danielle F
Keyserling, Thomas C
author_sort Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite high obesity prevalence rates, few low-income midlife women participate in weight loss maintenance trials. This pilot study aims to assess the effectiveness of two weight loss maintenance interventions in this under-represented population. METHODS: Low-income midlife women who completed a 16-week weight loss intervention and lost ≥ 8 lbs (3.6 kg) were eligible to enroll in one of two 12-month maintenance programs. The programs were similar in content and had the same number of total contacts, but were different in the contact modality (Phone + Face-to-Face vs. Face-to-Face Only). Two criteria were used to assess successful weight loss maintenance at 12 months: (1) retaining a loss of ≥ 5% of body weight from the start of the weight loss phase and (2) a change in body weight of < 3%, from the start to the end of the maintenance program. Outcome measures of changes in physiologic and psychosocial factors, and evaluations of process measures and program acceptability (measured at 12 months) are also reported. For categorical variables, likelihood ratio or Fisher’s Exact (for small samples) tests were used to evaluate statistically significant relationships; for continuous variables, t-tests or their equivalents were used to assess differences between means and also to identify correlates of weight loss maintenance. RESULTS: Overall, during the 12-month maintenance period, 41% (24/58) of participants maintained a loss of ≥ 5% of initial weight and 43% (25/58) had a <3% change in weight. None of the comparisons between the two maintenance programs were statistically significant. However, improvements in blood pressure and dietary behaviors remained significant at the end of the 12-month maintenance period for participants in both programs. Participant attendance and acceptability were high for both programs. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of two pilot 12-month maintenance interventions provides support for further research in weight loss maintenance among high-risk, low-income women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00288301
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37170282013-07-21 A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D Johnston, Larry F Gizlice, Ziya Garcia, Beverly A Lindsley, Sara C Gold, Alison D Braxton, Danielle F Keyserling, Thomas C BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite high obesity prevalence rates, few low-income midlife women participate in weight loss maintenance trials. This pilot study aims to assess the effectiveness of two weight loss maintenance interventions in this under-represented population. METHODS: Low-income midlife women who completed a 16-week weight loss intervention and lost ≥ 8 lbs (3.6 kg) were eligible to enroll in one of two 12-month maintenance programs. The programs were similar in content and had the same number of total contacts, but were different in the contact modality (Phone + Face-to-Face vs. Face-to-Face Only). Two criteria were used to assess successful weight loss maintenance at 12 months: (1) retaining a loss of ≥ 5% of body weight from the start of the weight loss phase and (2) a change in body weight of < 3%, from the start to the end of the maintenance program. Outcome measures of changes in physiologic and psychosocial factors, and evaluations of process measures and program acceptability (measured at 12 months) are also reported. For categorical variables, likelihood ratio or Fisher’s Exact (for small samples) tests were used to evaluate statistically significant relationships; for continuous variables, t-tests or their equivalents were used to assess differences between means and also to identify correlates of weight loss maintenance. RESULTS: Overall, during the 12-month maintenance period, 41% (24/58) of participants maintained a loss of ≥ 5% of initial weight and 43% (25/58) had a <3% change in weight. None of the comparisons between the two maintenance programs were statistically significant. However, improvements in blood pressure and dietary behaviors remained significant at the end of the 12-month maintenance period for participants in both programs. Participant attendance and acceptability were high for both programs. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of two pilot 12-month maintenance interventions provides support for further research in weight loss maintenance among high-risk, low-income women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00288301 BioMed Central 2013-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3717028/ /pubmed/23855318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-653 Text en Copyright © 2013 Samuel-Hodge et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D
Johnston, Larry F
Gizlice, Ziya
Garcia, Beverly A
Lindsley, Sara C
Gold, Alison D
Braxton, Danielle F
Keyserling, Thomas C
A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
title A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
title_full A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
title_fullStr A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
title_short A pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
title_sort pilot study comparing two weight loss maintenance interventions among low-income, mid-life women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23855318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-653
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelhodgecarmend apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT johnstonlarryf apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT gizliceziya apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT garciabeverlya apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT lindsleysarac apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT goldalisond apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT braxtondaniellef apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT keyserlingthomasc apilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT samuelhodgecarmend pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT johnstonlarryf pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT gizliceziya pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT garciabeverlya pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT lindsleysarac pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT goldalisond pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT braxtondaniellef pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen
AT keyserlingthomasc pilotstudycomparingtwoweightlossmaintenanceinterventionsamonglowincomemidlifewomen