Cargando…

Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity

BACKGROUND: Techniques for the skeletal attachment of amputation-prostheses have been developed over recent decades. This type of attachment has only been performed on a small number of patients. It poses various potential advantages compared to conventional treatment with a socket, but is also asso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Welke, Bastian, Hurschler, Christof, Föller, Marie, Schwarze, Michael, Calliess, Tilman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23844992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-70
_version_ 1782277668119511040
author Welke, Bastian
Hurschler, Christof
Föller, Marie
Schwarze, Michael
Calliess, Tilman
author_facet Welke, Bastian
Hurschler, Christof
Föller, Marie
Schwarze, Michael
Calliess, Tilman
author_sort Welke, Bastian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Techniques for the skeletal attachment of amputation-prostheses have been developed over recent decades. This type of attachment has only been performed on a small number of patients. It poses various potential advantages compared to conventional treatment with a socket, but is also associated with an increased risk of bone or implant-bone interface fracture in the case of a fall. We therefore investigated the bending stiffness and ultimate bending moment of such devices implanted in human and synthetic bones. METHODS: Eight human specimens and 16 synthetic models of the proximal femora were implanted with lower extremity prostheses and eight human specimens and six synthetic humeri were implanted with upper extremity prostheses. They were dissected according to typical amputation levels and underwent loading in a material testing machine in a four-point bending setup. Bending stiffness, ultimate bending moment and fracture modes were determined in a load to failure experiment. Additionally, axial pull-out was performed on eight synthetic specimens of the lower extremity. RESULTS: Maximum bending moment of the synthetic femora was 160.6±27.5 Nm, the flexural rigidity of the synthetic femora was 189.0±22.6 Nm(2). Maximum bending moment of the human femora was 100.4±38.5 Nm, and the flexural rigidity was 137.8±29.4 Nm(2). The maximum bending moment of the six synthetic humeri was 104.9±19.0 Nm, and the flexural rigidity was 63.7±3.6 Nm(2). For the human humeri the maximum bending moment was 36.7±11.0 Nm, and the flexural rigidity at was 43.7±10.5 Nm(2). The maximum pull-out force for the eight synthetic femora was 3571±919 N. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were found between human and synthetic specimens of the lower and upper extremity regarding maximum bending moment, bending displacement and flexural rigidity. The results of this study are relevant with respect to previous finding regarding the load at the interfaces of osseointegrated prosthesis fixation devices and are crucial for the development of safety devices intended to protect the bone-implant interface from damaging loadings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37171412013-07-23 Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity Welke, Bastian Hurschler, Christof Föller, Marie Schwarze, Michael Calliess, Tilman Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Techniques for the skeletal attachment of amputation-prostheses have been developed over recent decades. This type of attachment has only been performed on a small number of patients. It poses various potential advantages compared to conventional treatment with a socket, but is also associated with an increased risk of bone or implant-bone interface fracture in the case of a fall. We therefore investigated the bending stiffness and ultimate bending moment of such devices implanted in human and synthetic bones. METHODS: Eight human specimens and 16 synthetic models of the proximal femora were implanted with lower extremity prostheses and eight human specimens and six synthetic humeri were implanted with upper extremity prostheses. They were dissected according to typical amputation levels and underwent loading in a material testing machine in a four-point bending setup. Bending stiffness, ultimate bending moment and fracture modes were determined in a load to failure experiment. Additionally, axial pull-out was performed on eight synthetic specimens of the lower extremity. RESULTS: Maximum bending moment of the synthetic femora was 160.6±27.5 Nm, the flexural rigidity of the synthetic femora was 189.0±22.6 Nm(2). Maximum bending moment of the human femora was 100.4±38.5 Nm, and the flexural rigidity was 137.8±29.4 Nm(2). The maximum bending moment of the six synthetic humeri was 104.9±19.0 Nm, and the flexural rigidity was 63.7±3.6 Nm(2). For the human humeri the maximum bending moment was 36.7±11.0 Nm, and the flexural rigidity at was 43.7±10.5 Nm(2). The maximum pull-out force for the eight synthetic femora was 3571±919 N. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were found between human and synthetic specimens of the lower and upper extremity regarding maximum bending moment, bending displacement and flexural rigidity. The results of this study are relevant with respect to previous finding regarding the load at the interfaces of osseointegrated prosthesis fixation devices and are crucial for the development of safety devices intended to protect the bone-implant interface from damaging loadings. BioMed Central 2013-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3717141/ /pubmed/23844992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-70 Text en Copyright © 2013 Welke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Welke, Bastian
Hurschler, Christof
Föller, Marie
Schwarze, Michael
Calliess, Tilman
Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
title Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
title_full Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
title_fullStr Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
title_full_unstemmed Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
title_short Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
title_sort stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23844992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-70
work_keys_str_mv AT welkebastian stiffnessandultimateloadofosseointegratedprosthesisfixationsintheupperandlowerextremity
AT hurschlerchristof stiffnessandultimateloadofosseointegratedprosthesisfixationsintheupperandlowerextremity
AT follermarie stiffnessandultimateloadofosseointegratedprosthesisfixationsintheupperandlowerextremity
AT schwarzemichael stiffnessandultimateloadofosseointegratedprosthesisfixationsintheupperandlowerextremity
AT calliesstilman stiffnessandultimateloadofosseointegratedprosthesisfixationsintheupperandlowerextremity