Cargando…

Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies

Visual stimulation alone is sufficient to produce visually induced postural reactivity (VIPR). While some studies have shown that VIPR increases with the velocity of a moving visual stimulus, others have shown that it decreases with the temporal frequency of an oscillating visual stimulus. These res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanssens, J.-M., Allard, R., Giraudet, G., Faubert, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23732950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3592-3
_version_ 1782277672858025984
author Hanssens, J.-M.
Allard, R.
Giraudet, G.
Faubert, J.
author_facet Hanssens, J.-M.
Allard, R.
Giraudet, G.
Faubert, J.
author_sort Hanssens, J.-M.
collection PubMed
description Visual stimulation alone is sufficient to produce visually induced postural reactivity (VIPR). While some studies have shown that VIPR increases with the velocity of a moving visual stimulus, others have shown that it decreases with the temporal frequency of an oscillating visual stimulus. These results seem contradictory given that these two variables co-vary in the same direction. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the VIPR can be different depending on the frequency range being considered. Twelve subjects were placed standing up in a virtual reality environment that simulated a black and white checkerboard at floor level. This checkerboard oscillated at seven frequencies (0.03–2.0 Hz) and three amplitudes (2, 4, and 8°), corresponding to nine velocities (0.125–32°/s). The virtual floor oscillated from left to right (mediolateral) or from front to back (anteroposterior). We calculated the subjects’ mean velocity (Ω) based on data from electromagnetic sensors positioned on the head and lower back. Our experiment shows that for temporal frequencies below 0.12 Hz, VIPR is visually dependent and increases with stimulus velocity. When stimulus velocity becomes too high, the body becomes incapable of following, and the VIPR saturates between 0.12 and 0.25 Hz. In this frequency range, maximal postural oscillation seems to depend on biomechanical constraints imposed by the positioning of the feet. For frequencies above 0.5 Hz, the body can no longer maintain the same oscillation state. This saturation may be linked to proprioceptive feedback mechanisms in the postural system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37171652013-07-23 Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies Hanssens, J.-M. Allard, R. Giraudet, G. Faubert, J. Exp Brain Res Research Article Visual stimulation alone is sufficient to produce visually induced postural reactivity (VIPR). While some studies have shown that VIPR increases with the velocity of a moving visual stimulus, others have shown that it decreases with the temporal frequency of an oscillating visual stimulus. These results seem contradictory given that these two variables co-vary in the same direction. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the VIPR can be different depending on the frequency range being considered. Twelve subjects were placed standing up in a virtual reality environment that simulated a black and white checkerboard at floor level. This checkerboard oscillated at seven frequencies (0.03–2.0 Hz) and three amplitudes (2, 4, and 8°), corresponding to nine velocities (0.125–32°/s). The virtual floor oscillated from left to right (mediolateral) or from front to back (anteroposterior). We calculated the subjects’ mean velocity (Ω) based on data from electromagnetic sensors positioned on the head and lower back. Our experiment shows that for temporal frequencies below 0.12 Hz, VIPR is visually dependent and increases with stimulus velocity. When stimulus velocity becomes too high, the body becomes incapable of following, and the VIPR saturates between 0.12 and 0.25 Hz. In this frequency range, maximal postural oscillation seems to depend on biomechanical constraints imposed by the positioning of the feet. For frequencies above 0.5 Hz, the body can no longer maintain the same oscillation state. This saturation may be linked to proprioceptive feedback mechanisms in the postural system. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-06-04 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3717165/ /pubmed/23732950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3592-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanssens, J.-M.
Allard, R.
Giraudet, G.
Faubert, J.
Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
title Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
title_full Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
title_fullStr Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
title_full_unstemmed Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
title_short Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
title_sort visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23732950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3592-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hanssensjm visuallyinducedposturalreactivityisvelocitydependentatlowtemporalfrequenciesandfrequencydependentathightemporalfrequencies
AT allardr visuallyinducedposturalreactivityisvelocitydependentatlowtemporalfrequenciesandfrequencydependentathightemporalfrequencies
AT giraudetg visuallyinducedposturalreactivityisvelocitydependentatlowtemporalfrequenciesandfrequencydependentathightemporalfrequencies
AT faubertj visuallyinducedposturalreactivityisvelocitydependentatlowtemporalfrequenciesandfrequencydependentathightemporalfrequencies