Cargando…

Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting. D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianchi, Valentina, Spitale, Alessandra, Ortelli, Laura, Mazzucchelli, Luca, Bordoni, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002818
_version_ 1782277693650239488
author Bianchi, Valentina
Spitale, Alessandra
Ortelli, Laura
Mazzucchelli, Luca
Bordoni, Andrea
author_facet Bianchi, Valentina
Spitale, Alessandra
Ortelli, Laura
Mazzucchelli, Luca
Bordoni, Andrea
author_sort Bianchi, Valentina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting. DESIGN: A comprehensive evidence-based literature search was performed to identify the initial list of QIs, which were then selected and developed using a two-step-modified Delphi process involving two multidisciplinary expert panels with expertise in CRC care, quality of care and epidemiology. SETTING: The QIs of the clinical cancer care (QC(3)) population-based project, which involves all the public and private hospitals and clinics present on the territory of Canton Ticino (South Switzerland). PARTICIPANTS: Ticino Cancer Registry, The Colorectal Cancer Working Group (CRC-WG) and the external academic Advisory Board (AB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Set of QIs which encompass the whole diagnostic-treatment process of CRC. RESULTS: Of the 149 QIs that emerged from 181 sources of literature, 104 were selected during the in-person meeting of CRC-WG. During the Delphi process, CRC-WG shortened the list to 89 QI. AB finally validated 27 QIs according to the phase of care: diagnosis (N=6), pathology (N=3), treatment (N=16) and outcome (N=2). CONCLUSIONS: Using the validated Delphi methodology, including a literature review of the evidence and integration of expert opinions from local clinicians and international experts, we were able to develop a list of QIs to assess QoCC for CRC. This will hopefully guarantee feasibility of data retrieval, as well as acceptance and translation of QIs into the daily clinical practice to improve QoCC. Moreover, evidence-based selected QIs allow one to assess immediate changes and improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic process that could be translated into a short-term benefit for patients with a possible gain both in overall and disease-free survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37174452013-07-22 Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer Bianchi, Valentina Spitale, Alessandra Ortelli, Laura Mazzucchelli, Luca Bordoni, Andrea BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting. DESIGN: A comprehensive evidence-based literature search was performed to identify the initial list of QIs, which were then selected and developed using a two-step-modified Delphi process involving two multidisciplinary expert panels with expertise in CRC care, quality of care and epidemiology. SETTING: The QIs of the clinical cancer care (QC(3)) population-based project, which involves all the public and private hospitals and clinics present on the territory of Canton Ticino (South Switzerland). PARTICIPANTS: Ticino Cancer Registry, The Colorectal Cancer Working Group (CRC-WG) and the external academic Advisory Board (AB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Set of QIs which encompass the whole diagnostic-treatment process of CRC. RESULTS: Of the 149 QIs that emerged from 181 sources of literature, 104 were selected during the in-person meeting of CRC-WG. During the Delphi process, CRC-WG shortened the list to 89 QI. AB finally validated 27 QIs according to the phase of care: diagnosis (N=6), pathology (N=3), treatment (N=16) and outcome (N=2). CONCLUSIONS: Using the validated Delphi methodology, including a literature review of the evidence and integration of expert opinions from local clinicians and international experts, we were able to develop a list of QIs to assess QoCC for CRC. This will hopefully guarantee feasibility of data retrieval, as well as acceptance and translation of QIs into the daily clinical practice to improve QoCC. Moreover, evidence-based selected QIs allow one to assess immediate changes and improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic process that could be translated into a short-term benefit for patients with a possible gain both in overall and disease-free survival. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3717445/ /pubmed/23869102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002818 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Bianchi, Valentina
Spitale, Alessandra
Ortelli, Laura
Mazzucchelli, Luca
Bordoni, Andrea
Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
title Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
title_full Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
title_short Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
title_sort quality indicators of clinical cancer care (qc(3)) in colorectal cancer
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002818
work_keys_str_mv AT bianchivalentina qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer
AT spitalealessandra qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer
AT ortellilaura qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer
AT mazzucchelliluca qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer
AT bordoniandrea qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer
AT qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer