Cargando…
Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer
OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting. D...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002818 |
_version_ | 1782277693650239488 |
---|---|
author | Bianchi, Valentina Spitale, Alessandra Ortelli, Laura Mazzucchelli, Luca Bordoni, Andrea |
author_facet | Bianchi, Valentina Spitale, Alessandra Ortelli, Laura Mazzucchelli, Luca Bordoni, Andrea |
author_sort | Bianchi, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting. DESIGN: A comprehensive evidence-based literature search was performed to identify the initial list of QIs, which were then selected and developed using a two-step-modified Delphi process involving two multidisciplinary expert panels with expertise in CRC care, quality of care and epidemiology. SETTING: The QIs of the clinical cancer care (QC(3)) population-based project, which involves all the public and private hospitals and clinics present on the territory of Canton Ticino (South Switzerland). PARTICIPANTS: Ticino Cancer Registry, The Colorectal Cancer Working Group (CRC-WG) and the external academic Advisory Board (AB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Set of QIs which encompass the whole diagnostic-treatment process of CRC. RESULTS: Of the 149 QIs that emerged from 181 sources of literature, 104 were selected during the in-person meeting of CRC-WG. During the Delphi process, CRC-WG shortened the list to 89 QI. AB finally validated 27 QIs according to the phase of care: diagnosis (N=6), pathology (N=3), treatment (N=16) and outcome (N=2). CONCLUSIONS: Using the validated Delphi methodology, including a literature review of the evidence and integration of expert opinions from local clinicians and international experts, we were able to develop a list of QIs to assess QoCC for CRC. This will hopefully guarantee feasibility of data retrieval, as well as acceptance and translation of QIs into the daily clinical practice to improve QoCC. Moreover, evidence-based selected QIs allow one to assess immediate changes and improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic process that could be translated into a short-term benefit for patients with a possible gain both in overall and disease-free survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3717445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37174452013-07-22 Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer Bianchi, Valentina Spitale, Alessandra Ortelli, Laura Mazzucchelli, Luca Bordoni, Andrea BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Assessing the quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become increasingly important to providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) to be applied in a population-based setting. DESIGN: A comprehensive evidence-based literature search was performed to identify the initial list of QIs, which were then selected and developed using a two-step-modified Delphi process involving two multidisciplinary expert panels with expertise in CRC care, quality of care and epidemiology. SETTING: The QIs of the clinical cancer care (QC(3)) population-based project, which involves all the public and private hospitals and clinics present on the territory of Canton Ticino (South Switzerland). PARTICIPANTS: Ticino Cancer Registry, The Colorectal Cancer Working Group (CRC-WG) and the external academic Advisory Board (AB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Set of QIs which encompass the whole diagnostic-treatment process of CRC. RESULTS: Of the 149 QIs that emerged from 181 sources of literature, 104 were selected during the in-person meeting of CRC-WG. During the Delphi process, CRC-WG shortened the list to 89 QI. AB finally validated 27 QIs according to the phase of care: diagnosis (N=6), pathology (N=3), treatment (N=16) and outcome (N=2). CONCLUSIONS: Using the validated Delphi methodology, including a literature review of the evidence and integration of expert opinions from local clinicians and international experts, we were able to develop a list of QIs to assess QoCC for CRC. This will hopefully guarantee feasibility of data retrieval, as well as acceptance and translation of QIs into the daily clinical practice to improve QoCC. Moreover, evidence-based selected QIs allow one to assess immediate changes and improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic process that could be translated into a short-term benefit for patients with a possible gain both in overall and disease-free survival. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3717445/ /pubmed/23869102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002818 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Bianchi, Valentina Spitale, Alessandra Ortelli, Laura Mazzucchelli, Luca Bordoni, Andrea Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer |
title | Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer |
title_full | Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer |
title_short | Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC(3)) in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | quality indicators of clinical cancer care (qc(3)) in colorectal cancer |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bianchivalentina qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer AT spitalealessandra qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer AT ortellilaura qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer AT mazzucchelliluca qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer AT bordoniandrea qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer AT qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareqc3incolorectalcancer |