Cargando…
Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: To identify published closed-loop Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs) and to summarise characteristics regarding their conduct and reporting. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched multiple bibliographic databases (January 2006–31 July 2011) for full-text, English langua...
Autores principales: | Sobieraj, Diana M, Cappelleri, Joseph C, Baker, William L, Phung, Olivia J, White, C Michael, Coleman, Craig I |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003111 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Use of antimicrobial dressings in England and the association with published clinical guidance: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hussey, Louise, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Impact of heterogeneity and effect size on the estimation of the optimal information size: analysis of recently published meta-analyses
por: Garcia-Alamino, Josep M, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Byrne, David, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities
por: Bachelet, Vivienne C, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antiepileptic drugs for classical trigeminal neuralgia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
por: Qin, Zongshi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)