Cargando…

Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation

A 45 year old male with multiple comorbidities presented to his internist with a 2 week history of right sided neck pain and tenderness, accompanied by tingling in the hand. The internists’ neurological examination was normal, except for decreased range of motion of the right arm. He referred the pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Epstein, Nancy E., Forte Esq, Carol L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878767
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.112620
_version_ 1782277706412457984
author Epstein, Nancy E.
Forte Esq, Carol L.
author_facet Epstein, Nancy E.
Forte Esq, Carol L.
author_sort Epstein, Nancy E.
collection PubMed
description A 45 year old male with multiple comorbidities presented to his internist with a 2 week history of right sided neck pain and tenderness, accompanied by tingling in the hand. The internists’ neurological examination was normal, except for decreased range of motion of the right arm. He referred the patient to a chiropractor; he performed plain X rays which revealed mild spasm, but never ordered a magnetic resonance imaging study. The chiropractor manipulated the patient's neck on two successive days. By the morning of the third visit, the patient reported extreme pain and difficulty walking. Without performing a new neurological examination or obtaining an MR scan, the chiropractor again manipulated the patient's neck. He immediately became quadriplegic. Despite undergoing an emergency C5 C6 anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion to address a massive disc found on the MR scan (CT was negative), the patient remained quadriplegic (e.g., C4 sensory, C6 motor levels). A major point of negligence in this case was the failure of both the referring internist and chiropractor to order an MR of the cervical spine prior to the chiropractic manipulation. The internist claimed that there was no known report of permanent quadriplegia resulting from neck manipulation in any medical journal, article or book, or in any literature of any kind or on the internet and that the risk of this injury must be vanishingly small given the large numbers of manipulations performed annually. The total amount of the verdict was $14,596,000.00 the internist's liability was 5% ($759,181.65).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37175292013-07-22 Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation Epstein, Nancy E. Forte Esq, Carol L. Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine A 45 year old male with multiple comorbidities presented to his internist with a 2 week history of right sided neck pain and tenderness, accompanied by tingling in the hand. The internists’ neurological examination was normal, except for decreased range of motion of the right arm. He referred the patient to a chiropractor; he performed plain X rays which revealed mild spasm, but never ordered a magnetic resonance imaging study. The chiropractor manipulated the patient's neck on two successive days. By the morning of the third visit, the patient reported extreme pain and difficulty walking. Without performing a new neurological examination or obtaining an MR scan, the chiropractor again manipulated the patient's neck. He immediately became quadriplegic. Despite undergoing an emergency C5 C6 anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion to address a massive disc found on the MR scan (CT was negative), the patient remained quadriplegic (e.g., C4 sensory, C6 motor levels). A major point of negligence in this case was the failure of both the referring internist and chiropractor to order an MR of the cervical spine prior to the chiropractic manipulation. The internist claimed that there was no known report of permanent quadriplegia resulting from neck manipulation in any medical journal, article or book, or in any literature of any kind or on the internet and that the risk of this injury must be vanishingly small given the large numbers of manipulations performed annually. The total amount of the verdict was $14,596,000.00 the internist's liability was 5% ($759,181.65). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3717529/ /pubmed/23878767 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.112620 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Epstein NE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Surgical Neurology International: Spine
Epstein, Nancy E.
Forte Esq, Carol L.
Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
title Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
title_full Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
title_fullStr Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
title_full_unstemmed Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
title_short Medicolegal corner: Quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
title_sort medicolegal corner: quadriplegia following chiropractic manipulation
topic Surgical Neurology International: Spine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23878767
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.112620
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinnancye medicolegalcornerquadriplegiafollowingchiropracticmanipulation
AT forteesqcaroll medicolegalcornerquadriplegiafollowingchiropracticmanipulation