Cargando…

Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the provision of condoms to prisoners in two Australian state prison systems with different policies affects sexual behaviour. In New South Wales’ (NSW) prisons, condoms are freely distributed, while in Queensland prisons none are distributed. METHODS: We used a computer-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butler, Tony, Richters, Juliet, Yap, Lorraine, Donovan, Basil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050856
_version_ 1782277708692062208
author Butler, Tony
Richters, Juliet
Yap, Lorraine
Donovan, Basil
author_facet Butler, Tony
Richters, Juliet
Yap, Lorraine
Donovan, Basil
author_sort Butler, Tony
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine if the provision of condoms to prisoners in two Australian state prison systems with different policies affects sexual behaviour. In New South Wales’ (NSW) prisons, condoms are freely distributed, while in Queensland prisons none are distributed. METHODS: We used a computer-assisted telephone interview to survey randomly selected prisoners in both states about their sexual behaviour in prison. RESULTS: Two thousand and eighteen male prisoners participated. The proportion of prisoners reporting anal sex in prison was equally low in NSW (3.3%) and Queensland (3.6%; p=0.8). A much higher proportion of prisoners who engaged in anal sex in NSW (56.8%) than Queensland (3.1%; p<0.0001) reported they had used a condom if they had had anal sex in prison. Sexual coercion was equally rare in both prison systems. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that condom provision to prisoners increased consensual or non-consensual sexual activity in prison. If available, condoms were much more likely to be used during anal sex. Condoms should be made available to prisoners as a basic human right.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37175892013-07-23 Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex Butler, Tony Richters, Juliet Yap, Lorraine Donovan, Basil Sex Transm Infect Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To determine if the provision of condoms to prisoners in two Australian state prison systems with different policies affects sexual behaviour. In New South Wales’ (NSW) prisons, condoms are freely distributed, while in Queensland prisons none are distributed. METHODS: We used a computer-assisted telephone interview to survey randomly selected prisoners in both states about their sexual behaviour in prison. RESULTS: Two thousand and eighteen male prisoners participated. The proportion of prisoners reporting anal sex in prison was equally low in NSW (3.3%) and Queensland (3.6%; p=0.8). A much higher proportion of prisoners who engaged in anal sex in NSW (56.8%) than Queensland (3.1%; p<0.0001) reported they had used a condom if they had had anal sex in prison. Sexual coercion was equally rare in both prison systems. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that condom provision to prisoners increased consensual or non-consensual sexual activity in prison. If available, condoms were much more likely to be used during anal sex. Condoms should be made available to prisoners as a basic human right. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3717589/ /pubmed/23300337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050856 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Butler, Tony
Richters, Juliet
Yap, Lorraine
Donovan, Basil
Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
title Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
title_full Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
title_fullStr Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
title_full_unstemmed Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
title_short Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
title_sort condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050856
work_keys_str_mv AT butlertony condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex
AT richtersjuliet condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex
AT yaplorraine condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex
AT donovanbasil condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex