Cargando…
Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the provision of condoms to prisoners in two Australian state prison systems with different policies affects sexual behaviour. In New South Wales’ (NSW) prisons, condoms are freely distributed, while in Queensland prisons none are distributed. METHODS: We used a computer-...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050856 |
_version_ | 1782277708692062208 |
---|---|
author | Butler, Tony Richters, Juliet Yap, Lorraine Donovan, Basil |
author_facet | Butler, Tony Richters, Juliet Yap, Lorraine Donovan, Basil |
author_sort | Butler, Tony |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine if the provision of condoms to prisoners in two Australian state prison systems with different policies affects sexual behaviour. In New South Wales’ (NSW) prisons, condoms are freely distributed, while in Queensland prisons none are distributed. METHODS: We used a computer-assisted telephone interview to survey randomly selected prisoners in both states about their sexual behaviour in prison. RESULTS: Two thousand and eighteen male prisoners participated. The proportion of prisoners reporting anal sex in prison was equally low in NSW (3.3%) and Queensland (3.6%; p=0.8). A much higher proportion of prisoners who engaged in anal sex in NSW (56.8%) than Queensland (3.1%; p<0.0001) reported they had used a condom if they had had anal sex in prison. Sexual coercion was equally rare in both prison systems. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that condom provision to prisoners increased consensual or non-consensual sexual activity in prison. If available, condoms were much more likely to be used during anal sex. Condoms should be made available to prisoners as a basic human right. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3717589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37175892013-07-23 Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex Butler, Tony Richters, Juliet Yap, Lorraine Donovan, Basil Sex Transm Infect Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To determine if the provision of condoms to prisoners in two Australian state prison systems with different policies affects sexual behaviour. In New South Wales’ (NSW) prisons, condoms are freely distributed, while in Queensland prisons none are distributed. METHODS: We used a computer-assisted telephone interview to survey randomly selected prisoners in both states about their sexual behaviour in prison. RESULTS: Two thousand and eighteen male prisoners participated. The proportion of prisoners reporting anal sex in prison was equally low in NSW (3.3%) and Queensland (3.6%; p=0.8). A much higher proportion of prisoners who engaged in anal sex in NSW (56.8%) than Queensland (3.1%; p<0.0001) reported they had used a condom if they had had anal sex in prison. Sexual coercion was equally rare in both prison systems. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that condom provision to prisoners increased consensual or non-consensual sexual activity in prison. If available, condoms were much more likely to be used during anal sex. Condoms should be made available to prisoners as a basic human right. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3717589/ /pubmed/23300337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050856 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Butler, Tony Richters, Juliet Yap, Lorraine Donovan, Basil Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
title | Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
title_full | Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
title_fullStr | Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
title_full_unstemmed | Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
title_short | Condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
title_sort | condoms for prisoners: no evidence that they increase sex in prison, but they increase safe sex |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butlertony condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex AT richtersjuliet condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex AT yaplorraine condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex AT donovanbasil condomsforprisonersnoevidencethattheyincreasesexinprisonbuttheyincreasesafesex |