Cargando…

Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery has become increasingly more popular for the removal of pituitary adenomas. It is also widely recognised that transsphenoidal microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas is a well-established procedure with good outcomes. Our objective was to meta-analyse t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ammirati, Mario, Wei, Lai, Ciric, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303194
_version_ 1782277710315257856
author Ammirati, Mario
Wei, Lai
Ciric, Ivan
author_facet Ammirati, Mario
Wei, Lai
Ciric, Ivan
author_sort Ammirati, Mario
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery has become increasingly more popular for the removal of pituitary adenomas. It is also widely recognised that transsphenoidal microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas is a well-established procedure with good outcomes. Our objective was to meta-analyse the short-term results of endoscopic and microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery. We undertook a systematic review of the English literature on results of transsphenoidal surgery, both microscopic and endoscopic from 1990 to 2011. Series with less than 10 patients were excluded. Pooled data were analysed using meta-analysis techniques to obtain estimate of death, complication rates and extent of tumour removal. Complications evaluated included cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, vascular complications, visual complications, diabetes insipidus, hypopituitarism and cranial nerve injury. Data were also analysed for tumour size and sex. 38 studies met the inclusion criteria yielding 24 endoscopic and 22 microscopic datasets (eight studies included both endoscopic and microscopic series). Meta-analysis of the available literature showed that the endoscopic transsphenoidal technique was associated with a higher incidence of vascular complications (p<0.0001). No difference was found between the two techniques in all other variables examined. Meta-analysis of the available literature reveals that endoscopic removal of pituitary adenoma, in the short term, does not seem to confer any advantages over the microscopic technique and the incidence of reported vascular complications was higher with endoscopic than with microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas. While we recognise the limitations of meta-analysis, our study suggests that a multicentre, randomised, comparative effectiveness study of the microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal techniques may be a reasonable approach towards establishing a true valuation of these techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37176012013-07-23 Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ammirati, Mario Wei, Lai Ciric, Ivan J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neurosurgery Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery has become increasingly more popular for the removal of pituitary adenomas. It is also widely recognised that transsphenoidal microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas is a well-established procedure with good outcomes. Our objective was to meta-analyse the short-term results of endoscopic and microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery. We undertook a systematic review of the English literature on results of transsphenoidal surgery, both microscopic and endoscopic from 1990 to 2011. Series with less than 10 patients were excluded. Pooled data were analysed using meta-analysis techniques to obtain estimate of death, complication rates and extent of tumour removal. Complications evaluated included cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, vascular complications, visual complications, diabetes insipidus, hypopituitarism and cranial nerve injury. Data were also analysed for tumour size and sex. 38 studies met the inclusion criteria yielding 24 endoscopic and 22 microscopic datasets (eight studies included both endoscopic and microscopic series). Meta-analysis of the available literature showed that the endoscopic transsphenoidal technique was associated with a higher incidence of vascular complications (p<0.0001). No difference was found between the two techniques in all other variables examined. Meta-analysis of the available literature reveals that endoscopic removal of pituitary adenoma, in the short term, does not seem to confer any advantages over the microscopic technique and the incidence of reported vascular complications was higher with endoscopic than with microscopic removal of pituitary adenomas. While we recognise the limitations of meta-analysis, our study suggests that a multicentre, randomised, comparative effectiveness study of the microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal techniques may be a reasonable approach towards establishing a true valuation of these techniques. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08 2012-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3717601/ /pubmed/23243265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303194 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Ammirati, Mario
Wei, Lai
Ciric, Ivan
Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303194
work_keys_str_mv AT ammiratimario shorttermoutcomeofendoscopicversusmicroscopicpituitaryadenomasurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weilai shorttermoutcomeofendoscopicversusmicroscopicpituitaryadenomasurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ciricivan shorttermoutcomeofendoscopicversusmicroscopicpituitaryadenomasurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis