Cargando…

Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians. METHODS: Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Leah L, Rivara, Frederick P, Ayyagari, Rajiv C, Ebel, Beth E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601
_version_ 1782277725084450816
author Thompson, Leah L
Rivara, Frederick P
Ayyagari, Rajiv C
Ebel, Beth E
author_facet Thompson, Leah L
Rivara, Frederick P
Ayyagari, Rajiv C
Ebel, Beth E
author_sort Thompson, Leah L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians. METHODS: Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site. RESULTS: Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians. CONCLUSIONS: Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3717764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37177642013-07-23 Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study Thompson, Leah L Rivara, Frederick P Ayyagari, Rajiv C Ebel, Beth E Inj Prev Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians. METHODS: Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site. RESULTS: Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians. CONCLUSIONS: Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08 2012-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3717764/ /pubmed/23243104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Thompson, Leah L
Rivara, Frederick P
Ayyagari, Rajiv C
Ebel, Beth E
Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
title Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
title_full Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
title_fullStr Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
title_short Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
title_sort impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3717764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonleahl impactofsocialandtechnologicaldistractiononpedestriancrossingbehaviouranobservationalstudy
AT rivarafrederickp impactofsocialandtechnologicaldistractiononpedestriancrossingbehaviouranobservationalstudy
AT ayyagarirajivc impactofsocialandtechnologicaldistractiononpedestriancrossingbehaviouranobservationalstudy
AT ebelbethe impactofsocialandtechnologicaldistractiononpedestriancrossingbehaviouranobservationalstudy