Cargando…
An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
INTRODUCTION: Complex chronic conditions often require long-term care from various healthcare professionals. Thus, maintaining quality care requires care coordination. Concepts for the study of care coordination require clarification to develop, study and evaluate coordination strategies. In 2007, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Igitur publishing
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882171 |
_version_ | 1782277761705967616 |
---|---|
author | Van Houdt, Sabine Heyrman, Jan Vanhaecht, Kris Sermeus, Walter De Lepeleire, Jan |
author_facet | Van Houdt, Sabine Heyrman, Jan Vanhaecht, Kris Sermeus, Walter De Lepeleire, Jan |
author_sort | Van Houdt, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Complex chronic conditions often require long-term care from various healthcare professionals. Thus, maintaining quality care requires care coordination. Concepts for the study of care coordination require clarification to develop, study and evaluate coordination strategies. In 2007, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality defined care coordination and proposed five theoretical frameworks for exploring care coordination. This study aimed to update current theoretical frameworks and clarify key concepts related to care coordination. METHODS: We performed a literature review to update existing theoretical frameworks. An in-depth analysis of these theoretical frameworks was conducted to formulate key concepts related to care coordination. RESULTS: Our literature review found seven previously unidentified theoretical frameworks for studying care coordination. The in-depth analysis identified fourteen key concepts that the theoretical frameworks addressed. These were ‘external factors’, ‘structure’, ‘tasks characteristics’, ‘cultural factors’, ‘knowledge and technology’, ‘need for coordination’, ‘administrative operational processes’, ‘exchange of information’, ‘goals’, ‘roles’, ‘quality of relationship’, ‘patient outcome’, ‘team outcome’, and ‘(inter)organizational outcome’. CONCLUSION: These 14 interrelated key concepts provide a base to develop or choose a framework for studying care coordination. The relational coordination theory and the multi-level framework are interesting as these are the most comprehensive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3718267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Igitur publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37182672013-07-23 An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination Van Houdt, Sabine Heyrman, Jan Vanhaecht, Kris Sermeus, Walter De Lepeleire, Jan Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: Complex chronic conditions often require long-term care from various healthcare professionals. Thus, maintaining quality care requires care coordination. Concepts for the study of care coordination require clarification to develop, study and evaluate coordination strategies. In 2007, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality defined care coordination and proposed five theoretical frameworks for exploring care coordination. This study aimed to update current theoretical frameworks and clarify key concepts related to care coordination. METHODS: We performed a literature review to update existing theoretical frameworks. An in-depth analysis of these theoretical frameworks was conducted to formulate key concepts related to care coordination. RESULTS: Our literature review found seven previously unidentified theoretical frameworks for studying care coordination. The in-depth analysis identified fourteen key concepts that the theoretical frameworks addressed. These were ‘external factors’, ‘structure’, ‘tasks characteristics’, ‘cultural factors’, ‘knowledge and technology’, ‘need for coordination’, ‘administrative operational processes’, ‘exchange of information’, ‘goals’, ‘roles’, ‘quality of relationship’, ‘patient outcome’, ‘team outcome’, and ‘(inter)organizational outcome’. CONCLUSION: These 14 interrelated key concepts provide a base to develop or choose a framework for studying care coordination. The relational coordination theory and the multi-level framework are interesting as these are the most comprehensive. Igitur publishing 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3718267/ /pubmed/23882171 Text en Copyright 2013, Authors retain the copyright of their article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Research and Theory Van Houdt, Sabine Heyrman, Jan Vanhaecht, Kris Sermeus, Walter De Lepeleire, Jan An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
title | An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
title_full | An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
title_fullStr | An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
title_full_unstemmed | An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
title_short | An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
title_sort | in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination |
topic | Research and Theory |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhoudtsabine anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT heyrmanjan anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT vanhaechtkris anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT sermeuswalter anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT delepeleirejan anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT vanhoudtsabine indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT heyrmanjan indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT vanhaechtkris indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT sermeuswalter indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination AT delepeleirejan indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination |