Cargando…

An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination

INTRODUCTION: Complex chronic conditions often require long-term care from various healthcare professionals. Thus, maintaining quality care requires care coordination. Concepts for the study of care coordination require clarification to develop, study and evaluate coordination strategies. In 2007, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Houdt, Sabine, Heyrman, Jan, Vanhaecht, Kris, Sermeus, Walter, De Lepeleire, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Igitur publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882171
_version_ 1782277761705967616
author Van Houdt, Sabine
Heyrman, Jan
Vanhaecht, Kris
Sermeus, Walter
De Lepeleire, Jan
author_facet Van Houdt, Sabine
Heyrman, Jan
Vanhaecht, Kris
Sermeus, Walter
De Lepeleire, Jan
author_sort Van Houdt, Sabine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Complex chronic conditions often require long-term care from various healthcare professionals. Thus, maintaining quality care requires care coordination. Concepts for the study of care coordination require clarification to develop, study and evaluate coordination strategies. In 2007, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality defined care coordination and proposed five theoretical frameworks for exploring care coordination. This study aimed to update current theoretical frameworks and clarify key concepts related to care coordination. METHODS: We performed a literature review to update existing theoretical frameworks. An in-depth analysis of these theoretical frameworks was conducted to formulate key concepts related to care coordination. RESULTS: Our literature review found seven previously unidentified theoretical frameworks for studying care coordination. The in-depth analysis identified fourteen key concepts that the theoretical frameworks addressed. These were ‘external factors’, ‘structure’, ‘tasks characteristics’, ‘cultural factors’, ‘knowledge and technology’, ‘need for coordination’, ‘administrative operational processes’, ‘exchange of information’, ‘goals’, ‘roles’, ‘quality of relationship’, ‘patient outcome’, ‘team outcome’, and ‘(inter)organizational outcome’. CONCLUSION: These 14 interrelated key concepts provide a base to develop or choose a framework for studying care coordination. The relational coordination theory and the multi-level framework are interesting as these are the most comprehensive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3718267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Igitur publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37182672013-07-23 An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination Van Houdt, Sabine Heyrman, Jan Vanhaecht, Kris Sermeus, Walter De Lepeleire, Jan Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: Complex chronic conditions often require long-term care from various healthcare professionals. Thus, maintaining quality care requires care coordination. Concepts for the study of care coordination require clarification to develop, study and evaluate coordination strategies. In 2007, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality defined care coordination and proposed five theoretical frameworks for exploring care coordination. This study aimed to update current theoretical frameworks and clarify key concepts related to care coordination. METHODS: We performed a literature review to update existing theoretical frameworks. An in-depth analysis of these theoretical frameworks was conducted to formulate key concepts related to care coordination. RESULTS: Our literature review found seven previously unidentified theoretical frameworks for studying care coordination. The in-depth analysis identified fourteen key concepts that the theoretical frameworks addressed. These were ‘external factors’, ‘structure’, ‘tasks characteristics’, ‘cultural factors’, ‘knowledge and technology’, ‘need for coordination’, ‘administrative operational processes’, ‘exchange of information’, ‘goals’, ‘roles’, ‘quality of relationship’, ‘patient outcome’, ‘team outcome’, and ‘(inter)organizational outcome’. CONCLUSION: These 14 interrelated key concepts provide a base to develop or choose a framework for studying care coordination. The relational coordination theory and the multi-level framework are interesting as these are the most comprehensive. Igitur publishing 2013-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3718267/ /pubmed/23882171 Text en Copyright 2013, Authors retain the copyright of their article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Van Houdt, Sabine
Heyrman, Jan
Vanhaecht, Kris
Sermeus, Walter
De Lepeleire, Jan
An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
title An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
title_full An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
title_fullStr An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
title_full_unstemmed An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
title_short An in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
title_sort in-depth analysis of theoretical frameworks for the study of care coordination
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23882171
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhoudtsabine anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT heyrmanjan anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT vanhaechtkris anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT sermeuswalter anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT delepeleirejan anindepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT vanhoudtsabine indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT heyrmanjan indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT vanhaechtkris indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT sermeuswalter indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination
AT delepeleirejan indepthanalysisoftheoreticalframeworksforthestudyofcarecoordination