Cargando…

Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study

BACKGROUND: In countries with gatekeeping and equitable access to general practitioners (GPs), social inequalities in GP-patient interaction could be an important mechanism by which inequalities in access to medical specialists arise. The aim of this study was to investigate whether socioeconomic in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vikum, Eirik, Johnsen, Roar, Krokstad, Steinar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23816237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-240
_version_ 1782277795646275584
author Vikum, Eirik
Johnsen, Roar
Krokstad, Steinar
author_facet Vikum, Eirik
Johnsen, Roar
Krokstad, Steinar
author_sort Vikum, Eirik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In countries with gatekeeping and equitable access to general practitioners (GPs), social inequalities in GP-patient interaction could be an important mechanism by which inequalities in access to medical specialists arise. The aim of this study was to investigate whether socioeconomic inequalities in experiences with general practice are associated with socioeconomic inequalities in access to specialist services. METHODS: The study included 6,067 participants in the third survey of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3, 2006–08) who were asked to evaluate their experiences with primary care and their regular general practitioner in Norway. Self-reported data on health status and number of visits to GP and specialist services in the last 12 months were included in the study. Socioeconomic status was measured by education and household income and rescaled to relative index of inequality (RII). Relative risks were calculated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: We found that a majority of patients reported positive experiences with general practice. Low socioeconomic status (SES) and male gender were associated with negative experiences. Patient experiences both directly and indirectly related to referrals were associated with the probability and quantity of specialist utilization: perception of low subjective influence on decisions about choice of medical care was associated with lower probability and quantity of specialist utilization, whereas desire to change the regular GP or to use GPs other than the regular GP and critical evaluations of the GP were associated with higher specialist consultation frequency. However, the level of education-related inequity in access to specialists was not sensitive to adjustment by survey responses. CONCLUSION: Patient experiences with general practice were associated with the patients’ level of utilization of specialist services. There are socioeconomic inequalities in patient experiences with general practice, however the aspects measured in this study do not explain the observed socioeconomic inequity in access to specialists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3718649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37186492013-07-23 Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study Vikum, Eirik Johnsen, Roar Krokstad, Steinar BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In countries with gatekeeping and equitable access to general practitioners (GPs), social inequalities in GP-patient interaction could be an important mechanism by which inequalities in access to medical specialists arise. The aim of this study was to investigate whether socioeconomic inequalities in experiences with general practice are associated with socioeconomic inequalities in access to specialist services. METHODS: The study included 6,067 participants in the third survey of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3, 2006–08) who were asked to evaluate their experiences with primary care and their regular general practitioner in Norway. Self-reported data on health status and number of visits to GP and specialist services in the last 12 months were included in the study. Socioeconomic status was measured by education and household income and rescaled to relative index of inequality (RII). Relative risks were calculated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: We found that a majority of patients reported positive experiences with general practice. Low socioeconomic status (SES) and male gender were associated with negative experiences. Patient experiences both directly and indirectly related to referrals were associated with the probability and quantity of specialist utilization: perception of low subjective influence on decisions about choice of medical care was associated with lower probability and quantity of specialist utilization, whereas desire to change the regular GP or to use GPs other than the regular GP and critical evaluations of the GP were associated with higher specialist consultation frequency. However, the level of education-related inequity in access to specialists was not sensitive to adjustment by survey responses. CONCLUSION: Patient experiences with general practice were associated with the patients’ level of utilization of specialist services. There are socioeconomic inequalities in patient experiences with general practice, however the aspects measured in this study do not explain the observed socioeconomic inequity in access to specialists. BioMed Central 2013-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3718649/ /pubmed/23816237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-240 Text en Copyright © 2013 Vikum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vikum, Eirik
Johnsen, Roar
Krokstad, Steinar
Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study
title Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study
title_full Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study
title_fullStr Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study
title_full_unstemmed Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study
title_short Social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based HUNT Study
title_sort social inequalities in patient experiences with general practice and in access to specialists: the population-based hunt study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3718649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23816237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-240
work_keys_str_mv AT vikumeirik socialinequalitiesinpatientexperienceswithgeneralpracticeandinaccesstospecialiststhepopulationbasedhuntstudy
AT johnsenroar socialinequalitiesinpatientexperienceswithgeneralpracticeandinaccesstospecialiststhepopulationbasedhuntstudy
AT krokstadsteinar socialinequalitiesinpatientexperienceswithgeneralpracticeandinaccesstospecialiststhepopulationbasedhuntstudy