Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review

Background: Approximately 72% of endometrial cancers are FIGO stage I at diagnosis and about 10% have lymph node metastases. An ideal diagnostic test for nodal disease would be able to prevent both overtreatment (i.e. unnecessary lymphadenectomy) and undertreatment (i.e. withholding lymphadenectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelikan, H.M.P., Trum, J.W., Bakers, F.C.H., Beets-Tan, R.G.H., Smits, L.J.M., Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3719052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23876490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0032
_version_ 1782277854399037440
author Pelikan, H.M.P.
Trum, J.W.
Bakers, F.C.H.
Beets-Tan, R.G.H.
Smits, L.J.M.
Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M.
author_facet Pelikan, H.M.P.
Trum, J.W.
Bakers, F.C.H.
Beets-Tan, R.G.H.
Smits, L.J.M.
Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M.
author_sort Pelikan, H.M.P.
collection PubMed
description Background: Approximately 72% of endometrial cancers are FIGO stage I at diagnosis and about 10% have lymph node metastases. An ideal diagnostic test for nodal disease would be able to prevent both overtreatment (i.e. unnecessary lymphadenectomy) and undertreatment (i.e. withholding lymphadenectomy or adjuvant postoperative treatment to patients with lymph node metastases). Objectives: In this review we compare the accuracy of preoperative tests (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, CA-125 serum levels, and ultrasonography) for the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancers with the final histopathologic diagnosis after complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy as the gold standard. Method: A systematic search in MEDLINE (using PubMed), Embase and The Cochrane Library was performed up to 23 July 2012. Results: We found one article that met our inclusion criteria for computed tomography, none for magnetic resonance imaging, 2 for positron emission tomography/computed tomography), 2 for CA-125 and none for ultrasonography. Conclusions: Due to the lack of high-quality articles on a preoperative test for lymph node status in endometrial cancer, no proper comparison between these modalities can be made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3719052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37190522014-06-13 Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review Pelikan, H.M.P. Trum, J.W. Bakers, F.C.H. Beets-Tan, R.G.H. Smits, L.J.M. Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M. Cancer Imaging Review Background: Approximately 72% of endometrial cancers are FIGO stage I at diagnosis and about 10% have lymph node metastases. An ideal diagnostic test for nodal disease would be able to prevent both overtreatment (i.e. unnecessary lymphadenectomy) and undertreatment (i.e. withholding lymphadenectomy or adjuvant postoperative treatment to patients with lymph node metastases). Objectives: In this review we compare the accuracy of preoperative tests (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, CA-125 serum levels, and ultrasonography) for the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancers with the final histopathologic diagnosis after complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy as the gold standard. Method: A systematic search in MEDLINE (using PubMed), Embase and The Cochrane Library was performed up to 23 July 2012. Results: We found one article that met our inclusion criteria for computed tomography, none for magnetic resonance imaging, 2 for positron emission tomography/computed tomography), 2 for CA-125 and none for ultrasonography. Conclusions: Due to the lack of high-quality articles on a preoperative test for lymph node status in endometrial cancer, no proper comparison between these modalities can be made. e-Med 2013-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3719052/ /pubmed/23876490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0032 Text en © 2013 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Review
Pelikan, H.M.P.
Trum, J.W.
Bakers, F.C.H.
Beets-Tan, R.G.H.
Smits, L.J.M.
Kruitwagen, R.F.P.M.
Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
title Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3719052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23876490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0032
work_keys_str_mv AT pelikanhmp diagnosticaccuracyofpreoperativetestsforlymphnodestatusinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT trumjw diagnosticaccuracyofpreoperativetestsforlymphnodestatusinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT bakersfch diagnosticaccuracyofpreoperativetestsforlymphnodestatusinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT beetstanrgh diagnosticaccuracyofpreoperativetestsforlymphnodestatusinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT smitsljm diagnosticaccuracyofpreoperativetestsforlymphnodestatusinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT kruitwagenrfpm diagnosticaccuracyofpreoperativetestsforlymphnodestatusinendometrialcancerasystematicreview