Cargando…
Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of intraepithelial duodenal lymphocytosis (IDL) is important in celiac disease (CD). There is no established cut-off value for increased number of IELs in the bulb. We therefore investigated the relation between IEL counts in the bulb and duodenal specimens in non-celiac subje...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3720215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23841671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-111 |
_version_ | 1782277939538165760 |
---|---|
author | Bednarska, Olga Ignatova, Simone Dahle, Charlotte Ström, Magnus |
author_facet | Bednarska, Olga Ignatova, Simone Dahle, Charlotte Ström, Magnus |
author_sort | Bednarska, Olga |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of intraepithelial duodenal lymphocytosis (IDL) is important in celiac disease (CD). There is no established cut-off value for increased number of IELs in the bulb. We therefore investigated the relation between IEL counts in the bulb and duodenal specimens in non-celiac subjects. METHODS: The number of CD3+ IELs was determined in specimens from the second part of the duodenum and from the bulb in 34 non-celiac subjects. The numbers of IELs in the villus tip and sides were counted and the quotient tip/side was calculated. HLA DQ2/DQ8 and serum antibodies against transglutaminase were analysed. RESULTS: The mean number of IELs per 100 enterocytes (95% CI) in specimens was 14.7 (11.8-17.6) in the bulb, and 21.2 (17.0-25.5) in the second part of the duodenum (p<0.01). There was no difference in IEL count or distribution comparing patients carrying or lacking HLA DQ2/DQ8. CONCLUSIONS: IEL count in non-celiac, HLA DQ2/DQ8 positive or negative patients is significantly lower in the bulb than in the second part of the duodenum. These findings implicate that the site of biopsy should be taken into account when considering duodenal lymphocytosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3720215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37202152013-07-24 Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum Bednarska, Olga Ignatova, Simone Dahle, Charlotte Ström, Magnus BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of intraepithelial duodenal lymphocytosis (IDL) is important in celiac disease (CD). There is no established cut-off value for increased number of IELs in the bulb. We therefore investigated the relation between IEL counts in the bulb and duodenal specimens in non-celiac subjects. METHODS: The number of CD3+ IELs was determined in specimens from the second part of the duodenum and from the bulb in 34 non-celiac subjects. The numbers of IELs in the villus tip and sides were counted and the quotient tip/side was calculated. HLA DQ2/DQ8 and serum antibodies against transglutaminase were analysed. RESULTS: The mean number of IELs per 100 enterocytes (95% CI) in specimens was 14.7 (11.8-17.6) in the bulb, and 21.2 (17.0-25.5) in the second part of the duodenum (p<0.01). There was no difference in IEL count or distribution comparing patients carrying or lacking HLA DQ2/DQ8. CONCLUSIONS: IEL count in non-celiac, HLA DQ2/DQ8 positive or negative patients is significantly lower in the bulb than in the second part of the duodenum. These findings implicate that the site of biopsy should be taken into account when considering duodenal lymphocytosis. BioMed Central 2013-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3720215/ /pubmed/23841671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-111 Text en Copyright © 2013 Bednarska et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bednarska, Olga Ignatova, Simone Dahle, Charlotte Ström, Magnus Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
title | Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
title_full | Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
title_fullStr | Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
title_short | Intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
title_sort | intraepithelial lymphocyte distribution differs between the bulb and the second part of duodenum |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3720215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23841671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-13-111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bednarskaolga intraepitheliallymphocytedistributiondiffersbetweenthebulbandthesecondpartofduodenum AT ignatovasimone intraepitheliallymphocytedistributiondiffersbetweenthebulbandthesecondpartofduodenum AT dahlecharlotte intraepitheliallymphocytedistributiondiffersbetweenthebulbandthesecondpartofduodenum AT strommagnus intraepitheliallymphocytedistributiondiffersbetweenthebulbandthesecondpartofduodenum |