Cargando…

Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective

INTRODUCTION: This project was based on the FIELD trial.1 It is a localisation of the study by Carrington and Stewart.2 The aim of the original study was to determine the impact of fenofibrate therapy on healthcare costs of middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of future cardiovascu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wessels, Francois
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Clinics Cardive Publishing 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3721364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20224845
_version_ 1782278061600800768
author Wessels, Francois
author_facet Wessels, Francois
author_sort Wessels, Francois
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This project was based on the FIELD trial.1 It is a localisation of the study by Carrington and Stewart.2 The aim of the original study was to determine the impact of fenofibrate therapy on healthcare costs of middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of future cardiovascular events. METHODS: The methodology used in the Carrington article2 was adopted for this study. The clinical foundation for the analysis was derived from the findings of the FIELD study.1 All costs were sourced from electronic databases obtained from private-sector South African funders of healthcare. Event costs for the cardiovascular events were determined and added to the treatment costs for the individual treatment arms. The cost saving was determined as the difference between the event costs saved and the additional treatment costs associated with fenofibrate treatment. All costs were reported as 2008 ZAR and a discount rate of 10% was used. The study adopted a South African private-sector funder perspective. RESULTS: If the same approach is followed as in the Carrington and Stewart study,2 a cost saving of 18% results. This is the difference between the total costs associated with the placebo and fenofibrate arms, respectively (R3 480 471 compared to R2 858 598 per 1 000 patient years for the placebo and fenofibrate arms, respectively). The total costs were determined as the sum of associated event costs and treatment costs for each of the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this exploratory analysis, it seems that Lipanthyl® treatment in middle-aged patients resulted in a cost saving due to the prevention of cardiovascular events when it was used in the treatment of type 2 diabetics, as in the FIELD study. It should therefore be considered to be cost effective, even when just the cardiovascular risk reduction effect is considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3721364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Clinics Cardive Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37213642013-08-07 Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective Wessels, Francois Cardiovasc J Afr Cardiovascular Topics INTRODUCTION: This project was based on the FIELD trial.1 It is a localisation of the study by Carrington and Stewart.2 The aim of the original study was to determine the impact of fenofibrate therapy on healthcare costs of middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of future cardiovascular events. METHODS: The methodology used in the Carrington article2 was adopted for this study. The clinical foundation for the analysis was derived from the findings of the FIELD study.1 All costs were sourced from electronic databases obtained from private-sector South African funders of healthcare. Event costs for the cardiovascular events were determined and added to the treatment costs for the individual treatment arms. The cost saving was determined as the difference between the event costs saved and the additional treatment costs associated with fenofibrate treatment. All costs were reported as 2008 ZAR and a discount rate of 10% was used. The study adopted a South African private-sector funder perspective. RESULTS: If the same approach is followed as in the Carrington and Stewart study,2 a cost saving of 18% results. This is the difference between the total costs associated with the placebo and fenofibrate arms, respectively (R3 480 471 compared to R2 858 598 per 1 000 patient years for the placebo and fenofibrate arms, respectively). The total costs were determined as the sum of associated event costs and treatment costs for each of the comparators. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this exploratory analysis, it seems that Lipanthyl® treatment in middle-aged patients resulted in a cost saving due to the prevention of cardiovascular events when it was used in the treatment of type 2 diabetics, as in the FIELD study. It should therefore be considered to be cost effective, even when just the cardiovascular risk reduction effect is considered. Clinics Cardive Publishing 2010-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3721364/ /pubmed/20224845 Text en Copyright © 2010 Clinics Cardive Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Topics
Wessels, Francois
Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective
title Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective
title_full Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective
title_fullStr Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective
title_full_unstemmed Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective
title_short Is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? A South African private-sector perspective
title_sort is fenofibrate a cost-saving treatment for middle-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes? a south african private-sector perspective
topic Cardiovascular Topics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3721364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20224845
work_keys_str_mv AT wesselsfrancois isfenofibrateacostsavingtreatmentformiddleagedindividualswithtype2diabetesasouthafricanprivatesectorperspective