Cargando…

Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine a method to decrease the use of homologous blood during openheart surgery using a simple blood-conservation protocol. We removed autologous blood from the patient before bypass and used isovolumetric substitution. We present the results of this prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savas Oz, Bilgehan, Arslan, Gokhan, Kaya, Erkan, Gunay, Celalettin, Cingoz, Faruk, Arslan, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Clinics Cardive Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3721870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24217042
http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2013-020
_version_ 1782278099112558592
author Savas Oz, Bilgehan
Arslan, Gokhan
Kaya, Erkan
Gunay, Celalettin
Cingoz, Faruk
Arslan, Mehmet
author_facet Savas Oz, Bilgehan
Arslan, Gokhan
Kaya, Erkan
Gunay, Celalettin
Cingoz, Faruk
Arslan, Mehmet
author_sort Savas Oz, Bilgehan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine a method to decrease the use of homologous blood during openheart surgery using a simple blood-conservation protocol. We removed autologous blood from the patient before bypass and used isovolumetric substitution. We present the results of this protocol on morbidity and mortality of surgery patients from two distinct time periods. METHODS: Patients from the two surgical phases were enrolled in this retrospective study in order to compare the outcomes using autologous or homologous blood in open-heart surgery. A total of 323 patients were included in the study. The autologous transfusion group (group 1) comprised 163 patients and the homologous transfusion group (group 2) 160 patients. In group 1, autologous bloods were prepared via a central venous catheter that was inserted into the right internal jugular vein in all patients, using the isovolumetric replacement technique. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital mortality and mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included the length of stay in hospital and in intensive care unit (ICU), time for extubation, re-intubations, pulmonary infections, pneumothorax, pleural effusions, atrial fibrillation, other arrhythmias, renal disease, allergic reactions, mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence, need for inotropic support, and low cardiac-output syndrome (LCOS). RESULTS: The mean ages of patients in groups 1 and 2 were 64.2 ± 10.3 and 61.5 ± 11.6 years, respectively. Thirty-eight of the patients in group 1 and 30 in group 2 were female. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality in either group. The mean extubation time, and ICU and hospital stays were significantly shorter in group 1. Furthermore, postoperative drainage amounts were less in group 1. There were significantly fewer patients with postoperative pulmonary complications, pneumonia, atrial fibrillation and renal disease. The number of patients who needed postoperative inotropic support and those with low cardiac output was also significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Autologous blood transfusion is a safe and effective method in carefully selected patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It not only prevents transfusion-related co-morbidities and complications but also enables early extubation time and shorter ICU and hospital stay. Furthermore, it reduces the cost of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3721870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Clinics Cardive Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37218702013-08-07 Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery Savas Oz, Bilgehan Arslan, Gokhan Kaya, Erkan Gunay, Celalettin Cingoz, Faruk Arslan, Mehmet Cardiovasc J Afr Cardiovascular Topics BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine a method to decrease the use of homologous blood during openheart surgery using a simple blood-conservation protocol. We removed autologous blood from the patient before bypass and used isovolumetric substitution. We present the results of this protocol on morbidity and mortality of surgery patients from two distinct time periods. METHODS: Patients from the two surgical phases were enrolled in this retrospective study in order to compare the outcomes using autologous or homologous blood in open-heart surgery. A total of 323 patients were included in the study. The autologous transfusion group (group 1) comprised 163 patients and the homologous transfusion group (group 2) 160 patients. In group 1, autologous bloods were prepared via a central venous catheter that was inserted into the right internal jugular vein in all patients, using the isovolumetric replacement technique. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital mortality and mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included the length of stay in hospital and in intensive care unit (ICU), time for extubation, re-intubations, pulmonary infections, pneumothorax, pleural effusions, atrial fibrillation, other arrhythmias, renal disease, allergic reactions, mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence, need for inotropic support, and low cardiac-output syndrome (LCOS). RESULTS: The mean ages of patients in groups 1 and 2 were 64.2 ± 10.3 and 61.5 ± 11.6 years, respectively. Thirty-eight of the patients in group 1 and 30 in group 2 were female. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality in either group. The mean extubation time, and ICU and hospital stays were significantly shorter in group 1. Furthermore, postoperative drainage amounts were less in group 1. There were significantly fewer patients with postoperative pulmonary complications, pneumonia, atrial fibrillation and renal disease. The number of patients who needed postoperative inotropic support and those with low cardiac output was also significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Autologous blood transfusion is a safe and effective method in carefully selected patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It not only prevents transfusion-related co-morbidities and complications but also enables early extubation time and shorter ICU and hospital stay. Furthermore, it reduces the cost of surgery. Clinics Cardive Publishing 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3721870/ /pubmed/24217042 http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2013-020 Text en Copyright © 2010 Clinics Cardive Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Topics
Savas Oz, Bilgehan
Arslan, Gokhan
Kaya, Erkan
Gunay, Celalettin
Cingoz, Faruk
Arslan, Mehmet
Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
title Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
title_full Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
title_short Comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
title_sort comparison of results of autologous versus homologous blood transfusion in open-heart surgery
topic Cardiovascular Topics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3721870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24217042
http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2013-020
work_keys_str_mv AT savasozbilgehan comparisonofresultsofautologousversushomologousbloodtransfusioninopenheartsurgery
AT arslangokhan comparisonofresultsofautologousversushomologousbloodtransfusioninopenheartsurgery
AT kayaerkan comparisonofresultsofautologousversushomologousbloodtransfusioninopenheartsurgery
AT gunaycelalettin comparisonofresultsofautologousversushomologousbloodtransfusioninopenheartsurgery
AT cingozfaruk comparisonofresultsofautologousversushomologousbloodtransfusioninopenheartsurgery
AT arslanmehmet comparisonofresultsofautologousversushomologousbloodtransfusioninopenheartsurgery