Cargando…

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms

The treatment of infected wounds is one possible therapeutic aspect of plasma medicine. Chronic wounds are often associated with microbial biofilms which limit the efficacy of antiseptics. The present study investigates two different surface barrier discharges with air plasma to compare their effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthes, Rutger, Bender, Claudia, Schlüter, Rabea, Koban, Ina, Bussiahn, René, Reuter, Stephan, Lademann, Jürgen, Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter, Kramer, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23894661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070462
_version_ 1782278147146776576
author Matthes, Rutger
Bender, Claudia
Schlüter, Rabea
Koban, Ina
Bussiahn, René
Reuter, Stephan
Lademann, Jürgen
Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter
Kramer, Axel
author_facet Matthes, Rutger
Bender, Claudia
Schlüter, Rabea
Koban, Ina
Bussiahn, René
Reuter, Stephan
Lademann, Jürgen
Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter
Kramer, Axel
author_sort Matthes, Rutger
collection PubMed
description The treatment of infected wounds is one possible therapeutic aspect of plasma medicine. Chronic wounds are often associated with microbial biofilms which limit the efficacy of antiseptics. The present study investigates two different surface barrier discharges with air plasma to compare their efficacy against microbial biofilms with chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX) as representative of an important antibiofilm antiseptic. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 and Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A were cultivated on polycarbonate discs. The biofilms were treated for 30, 60, 150, 300 or 600 s with plasma or for 600 s with 0.1% CHX, respectively. After treatment, biofilms were dispensed by ultrasound and the antimicrobial effects were determined as difference in the number of the colony forming units by microbial culture. A high antimicrobial efficacy on biofilms of both plasma sources in comparison to CHX treatment was shown. The efficacy differs between the used strains and plasma sources. For illustration, the biofilms were examined under a scanning electron microscope before and after treatment. Additionally, cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay with L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The cell toxicity of the used plasma limits its applicability on human tissue to maximally 150 s. The emitted UV irradiance was measured to estimate whether UV could limit the application on human tissue at the given parameters. It was found that the UV emission is negligibly low. In conclusion, the results support the assumption that air plasma could be an option for therapy of chronic wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3722131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37221312013-07-26 Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms Matthes, Rutger Bender, Claudia Schlüter, Rabea Koban, Ina Bussiahn, René Reuter, Stephan Lademann, Jürgen Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter Kramer, Axel PLoS One Research Article The treatment of infected wounds is one possible therapeutic aspect of plasma medicine. Chronic wounds are often associated with microbial biofilms which limit the efficacy of antiseptics. The present study investigates two different surface barrier discharges with air plasma to compare their efficacy against microbial biofilms with chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX) as representative of an important antibiofilm antiseptic. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 and Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A were cultivated on polycarbonate discs. The biofilms were treated for 30, 60, 150, 300 or 600 s with plasma or for 600 s with 0.1% CHX, respectively. After treatment, biofilms were dispensed by ultrasound and the antimicrobial effects were determined as difference in the number of the colony forming units by microbial culture. A high antimicrobial efficacy on biofilms of both plasma sources in comparison to CHX treatment was shown. The efficacy differs between the used strains and plasma sources. For illustration, the biofilms were examined under a scanning electron microscope before and after treatment. Additionally, cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay with L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The cell toxicity of the used plasma limits its applicability on human tissue to maximally 150 s. The emitted UV irradiance was measured to estimate whether UV could limit the application on human tissue at the given parameters. It was found that the UV emission is negligibly low. In conclusion, the results support the assumption that air plasma could be an option for therapy of chronic wounds. Public Library of Science 2013-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3722131/ /pubmed/23894661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070462 Text en © 2013 Matthes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matthes, Rutger
Bender, Claudia
Schlüter, Rabea
Koban, Ina
Bussiahn, René
Reuter, Stephan
Lademann, Jürgen
Weltmann, Klaus-Dieter
Kramer, Axel
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms
title Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms
title_full Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms
title_short Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Surface Barrier Discharges with Air Plasma against In Vitro Biofilms
title_sort antimicrobial efficacy of two surface barrier discharges with air plasma against in vitro biofilms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23894661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070462
work_keys_str_mv AT matthesrutger antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT benderclaudia antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT schluterrabea antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT kobanina antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT bussiahnrene antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT reuterstephan antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT lademannjurgen antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT weltmannklausdieter antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms
AT krameraxel antimicrobialefficacyoftwosurfacebarrierdischargeswithairplasmaagainstinvitrobiofilms