Cargando…

Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study

BACKGROUND: The current common and dogmatic opinion is that whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) should not be performed in major trauma patients in shock. We aimed to assess whether WBCT during trauma-room treatment has any effect on the mortality of severely injured patients in shock. METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber-Wagner, Stefan, Biberthaler, Peter, Häberle, Sandra, Wierer, Matthias, Dobritz, Martin, Rummeny, Ernst, van Griensven, Martijn, Kanz, Karl-Georg, Lefering, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23894365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068880
_version_ 1782278163358810112
author Huber-Wagner, Stefan
Biberthaler, Peter
Häberle, Sandra
Wierer, Matthias
Dobritz, Martin
Rummeny, Ernst
van Griensven, Martijn
Kanz, Karl-Georg
Lefering, Rolf
author_facet Huber-Wagner, Stefan
Biberthaler, Peter
Häberle, Sandra
Wierer, Matthias
Dobritz, Martin
Rummeny, Ernst
van Griensven, Martijn
Kanz, Karl-Georg
Lefering, Rolf
author_sort Huber-Wagner, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current common and dogmatic opinion is that whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) should not be performed in major trauma patients in shock. We aimed to assess whether WBCT during trauma-room treatment has any effect on the mortality of severely injured patients in shock. METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study involving 16719 adult blunt major trauma patients we compared the survival of patients who were in moderate, severe or no shock (systolic blood pressure 90–110,<90 or >110 mmHg) at hospital admission and who received WBCT during resuscitation to those who did not. Using data derived from the 2002–2009 version of TraumaRegister®, we determined the observed and predicted mortality and calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) as well as logistic regressions. FINDINGS: 9233 (55.2%) of the 16719 patients received WBCT. The mean injury severity score was 28.8±12.1. The overall mortality rate was 17.4% (SMR  = 0.85, 95%CI 0.81–0.89) for patients with WBCT and 21.4% (SMR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.94–1.02) for those without WBCT (p<0.001). 4280 (25.6%) patients were in moderate shock and 1821 (10.9%) in severe shock. The mortality rate for patients in moderate shock with WBCT was 18.1% (SMR 0.85, CI95% 0.78–0.93) compared to 22.6% (SMR 1.03, CI95% 0.94–1.12) to those without WBCT (p<0.001, p = 0.002 for the SMRs). The mortality rate for patients in severe shock with WBCT was 42.1% (SMR 0.99, CI95% 0.92–1.06) compared to 54.9% (SMR 1.10, CI95% 1.02–1.16) to those without WBCT (p<0.001, p = 0.049 for the SMRs). Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that WBCT is an independent predictor for survival that significantly increases the chance of survival in patients in moderate shock (OR = 0.73; 95%CI 0.60–0.90, p = 0.002) as well as in severe shock (OR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.52–0.88, p = 0.004). The number needed to scan related to survival was 35 for all patients, 26 for those in moderate shock and 20 for those in severe shock. CONCLUSIONS: WBCT during trauma resuscitation significantly increased the survival in haemodynamically stable as well as in haemodynamically unstable major trauma patients. Thus, the application of WBCT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients seems to be safe, feasible and justified if performed quickly within a well-structured environment and by a well-organized trauma team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3722202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37222022013-07-26 Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study Huber-Wagner, Stefan Biberthaler, Peter Häberle, Sandra Wierer, Matthias Dobritz, Martin Rummeny, Ernst van Griensven, Martijn Kanz, Karl-Georg Lefering, Rolf PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The current common and dogmatic opinion is that whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) should not be performed in major trauma patients in shock. We aimed to assess whether WBCT during trauma-room treatment has any effect on the mortality of severely injured patients in shock. METHODS: In a retrospective multicenter cohort study involving 16719 adult blunt major trauma patients we compared the survival of patients who were in moderate, severe or no shock (systolic blood pressure 90–110,<90 or >110 mmHg) at hospital admission and who received WBCT during resuscitation to those who did not. Using data derived from the 2002–2009 version of TraumaRegister®, we determined the observed and predicted mortality and calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) as well as logistic regressions. FINDINGS: 9233 (55.2%) of the 16719 patients received WBCT. The mean injury severity score was 28.8±12.1. The overall mortality rate was 17.4% (SMR  = 0.85, 95%CI 0.81–0.89) for patients with WBCT and 21.4% (SMR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.94–1.02) for those without WBCT (p<0.001). 4280 (25.6%) patients were in moderate shock and 1821 (10.9%) in severe shock. The mortality rate for patients in moderate shock with WBCT was 18.1% (SMR 0.85, CI95% 0.78–0.93) compared to 22.6% (SMR 1.03, CI95% 0.94–1.12) to those without WBCT (p<0.001, p = 0.002 for the SMRs). The mortality rate for patients in severe shock with WBCT was 42.1% (SMR 0.99, CI95% 0.92–1.06) compared to 54.9% (SMR 1.10, CI95% 1.02–1.16) to those without WBCT (p<0.001, p = 0.049 for the SMRs). Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that WBCT is an independent predictor for survival that significantly increases the chance of survival in patients in moderate shock (OR = 0.73; 95%CI 0.60–0.90, p = 0.002) as well as in severe shock (OR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.52–0.88, p = 0.004). The number needed to scan related to survival was 35 for all patients, 26 for those in moderate shock and 20 for those in severe shock. CONCLUSIONS: WBCT during trauma resuscitation significantly increased the survival in haemodynamically stable as well as in haemodynamically unstable major trauma patients. Thus, the application of WBCT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients seems to be safe, feasible and justified if performed quickly within a well-structured environment and by a well-organized trauma team. Public Library of Science 2013-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3722202/ /pubmed/23894365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068880 Text en © 2013 Huber-Wagner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huber-Wagner, Stefan
Biberthaler, Peter
Häberle, Sandra
Wierer, Matthias
Dobritz, Martin
Rummeny, Ernst
van Griensven, Martijn
Kanz, Karl-Georg
Lefering, Rolf
Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study
title Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study
title_full Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study
title_fullStr Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study
title_full_unstemmed Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study
title_short Whole-Body CT in Haemodynamically Unstable Severely Injured Patients – A Retrospective, Multicentre Study
title_sort whole-body ct in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients – a retrospective, multicentre study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23894365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068880
work_keys_str_mv AT huberwagnerstefan wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT biberthalerpeter wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT haberlesandra wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT wierermatthias wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT dobritzmartin wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT rummenyernst wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT vangriensvenmartijn wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT kanzkarlgeorg wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT leferingrolf wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy
AT wholebodyctinhaemodynamicallyunstableseverelyinjuredpatientsaretrospectivemulticentrestudy