Cargando…
The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks
In computational neuroscience it is generally accepted that human motor memory contains neural representations of the physics of the musculoskeletal system and the objects in the environment. These representations are called “internal models”. Force field studies, in which subjects have to adapt to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00479 |
_version_ | 1782278199227449344 |
---|---|
author | Focke, Anne Stockinger, Christian Diepold, Christina Taubert, Marco Stein, Thorsten |
author_facet | Focke, Anne Stockinger, Christian Diepold, Christina Taubert, Marco Stein, Thorsten |
author_sort | Focke, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | In computational neuroscience it is generally accepted that human motor memory contains neural representations of the physics of the musculoskeletal system and the objects in the environment. These representations are called “internal models”. Force field studies, in which subjects have to adapt to dynamic perturbations induced by a robotic manipulandum, are an established tool to analyze the characteristics of such internal models. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether catch trials during force field learning could influence the consolidation of motor memory in more complex tasks. Thereby, the force field was more than double the force field of previous studies (35 N·s/m). Moreover, the arm of the subjects was not supported. A total of 46 subjects participated in this study and performed center-out movements at a robotic manipulandum in two different force fields. Two control groups learned force field A on day 1 and were retested in the same force field on day 3 (AA). Two test groups additionally learned an interfering force field B (= −A) on day 2 (ABA). The difference between the two test and control groups, respectively, was the absence (0%) or presence (19%) of catch trials, in which the force field was turned-off suddenly. The results showed consolidation of force field A on day 3 for both control groups. Test groups showed no consolidation of force field A (19% catch trials) and even poorer performance on day 3 (0% catch trials). In conclusion, it can be stated that catch trials seem to have a positive effect on the performance on day 3 but do not trigger a consolidation process as shown in previous studies that used a lower force field viscosity with supported arm. These findings indicate that the results of previous studies in which less complex tasks were analyzed, cannot be fully transferred to more complex tasks. Moreover, the effects of catch trials in these situations are insufficiently understood and further research is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3722502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37225022013-07-29 The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks Focke, Anne Stockinger, Christian Diepold, Christina Taubert, Marco Stein, Thorsten Front Psychol Psychology In computational neuroscience it is generally accepted that human motor memory contains neural representations of the physics of the musculoskeletal system and the objects in the environment. These representations are called “internal models”. Force field studies, in which subjects have to adapt to dynamic perturbations induced by a robotic manipulandum, are an established tool to analyze the characteristics of such internal models. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether catch trials during force field learning could influence the consolidation of motor memory in more complex tasks. Thereby, the force field was more than double the force field of previous studies (35 N·s/m). Moreover, the arm of the subjects was not supported. A total of 46 subjects participated in this study and performed center-out movements at a robotic manipulandum in two different force fields. Two control groups learned force field A on day 1 and were retested in the same force field on day 3 (AA). Two test groups additionally learned an interfering force field B (= −A) on day 2 (ABA). The difference between the two test and control groups, respectively, was the absence (0%) or presence (19%) of catch trials, in which the force field was turned-off suddenly. The results showed consolidation of force field A on day 3 for both control groups. Test groups showed no consolidation of force field A (19% catch trials) and even poorer performance on day 3 (0% catch trials). In conclusion, it can be stated that catch trials seem to have a positive effect on the performance on day 3 but do not trigger a consolidation process as shown in previous studies that used a lower force field viscosity with supported arm. These findings indicate that the results of previous studies in which less complex tasks were analyzed, cannot be fully transferred to more complex tasks. Moreover, the effects of catch trials in these situations are insufficiently understood and further research is needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3722502/ /pubmed/23898319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00479 Text en Copyright © 2013 Focke, Stockinger, Diepold, Taubert and Stein. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Focke, Anne Stockinger, Christian Diepold, Christina Taubert, Marco Stein, Thorsten The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
title | The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
title_full | The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
title_fullStr | The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
title_short | The influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
title_sort | influence of catch trials on the consolidation of motor memory in force field adaptation tasks |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3722502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fockeanne theinfluenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT stockingerchristian theinfluenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT diepoldchristina theinfluenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT taubertmarco theinfluenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT steinthorsten theinfluenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT fockeanne influenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT stockingerchristian influenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT diepoldchristina influenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT taubertmarco influenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks AT steinthorsten influenceofcatchtrialsontheconsolidationofmotormemoryinforcefieldadaptationtasks |