Cargando…

Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases

PURPOSE: Mutations in the transcription factor IRF6 cause allelic autosomal dominant clefting syndromes, Van der Woude syndrome, and popliteal pterygium syndrome. We compared the distribution of IRF6 coding and splice-site mutations from 549 families with Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygiu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leslie, Elizabeth J., Standley, Jennifer, Compton, John, Bale, Sherri, Schutte, Brian C., Murray, Jeffrey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3723330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23154523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.141
_version_ 1782278265317097472
author Leslie, Elizabeth J.
Standley, Jennifer
Compton, John
Bale, Sherri
Schutte, Brian C.
Murray, Jeffrey C.
author_facet Leslie, Elizabeth J.
Standley, Jennifer
Compton, John
Bale, Sherri
Schutte, Brian C.
Murray, Jeffrey C.
author_sort Leslie, Elizabeth J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Mutations in the transcription factor IRF6 cause allelic autosomal dominant clefting syndromes, Van der Woude syndrome, and popliteal pterygium syndrome. We compared the distribution of IRF6 coding and splice-site mutations from 549 families with Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygium syndrome with that of variants from the 1000 Genomes and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Projects. METHODS: We compiled all published pathogenic IRF6 mutations and performed direct sequencing of IRF6 in families with Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygium syndrome. RESULTS: Although mutations causing Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygium syndrome were nonrandomly distributed with significantly increased frequencies in the DNA-binding domain (P = 0.0001), variants found in controls were rare and evenly distributed in IRF6. Of 194 different missense or nonsense variants described as potentially pathogenic, we identified only two in more than 6,000 controls. PolyPhen and SIFT (sorting intolerant from tolerant) reported 5.9% of missense mutations in patients as benign, suggesting that use of current in silico prediction models to determine function can have significant false negatives. CONCLUSION: Mutation of IRF6 occurs infrequently in controls, suggesting that for IRF6 there is a high probability that disruption of the coding sequence, particularly the DNA-binding domain, will result in syndromic features. Prior associations of coding sequence variants in IRF6 with clefting syndromes have had few false positives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3723330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37233302013-11-01 Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases Leslie, Elizabeth J. Standley, Jennifer Compton, John Bale, Sherri Schutte, Brian C. Murray, Jeffrey C. Genet Med Original Research Article PURPOSE: Mutations in the transcription factor IRF6 cause allelic autosomal dominant clefting syndromes, Van der Woude syndrome, and popliteal pterygium syndrome. We compared the distribution of IRF6 coding and splice-site mutations from 549 families with Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygium syndrome with that of variants from the 1000 Genomes and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Projects. METHODS: We compiled all published pathogenic IRF6 mutations and performed direct sequencing of IRF6 in families with Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygium syndrome. RESULTS: Although mutations causing Van der Woude syndrome or popliteal pterygium syndrome were nonrandomly distributed with significantly increased frequencies in the DNA-binding domain (P = 0.0001), variants found in controls were rare and evenly distributed in IRF6. Of 194 different missense or nonsense variants described as potentially pathogenic, we identified only two in more than 6,000 controls. PolyPhen and SIFT (sorting intolerant from tolerant) reported 5.9% of missense mutations in patients as benign, suggesting that use of current in silico prediction models to determine function can have significant false negatives. CONCLUSION: Mutation of IRF6 occurs infrequently in controls, suggesting that for IRF6 there is a high probability that disruption of the coding sequence, particularly the DNA-binding domain, will result in syndromic features. Prior associations of coding sequence variants in IRF6 with clefting syndromes have had few false positives. Nature Publishing Group 2013-05 2012-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3723330/ /pubmed/23154523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.141 Text en Copyright © 2013 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Leslie, Elizabeth J.
Standley, Jennifer
Compton, John
Bale, Sherri
Schutte, Brian C.
Murray, Jeffrey C.
Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
title Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
title_full Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
title_short Comparative analysis of IRF6 variants in families with Van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
title_sort comparative analysis of irf6 variants in families with van der woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome using public whole-exome databases
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3723330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23154523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.141
work_keys_str_mv AT leslieelizabethj comparativeanalysisofirf6variantsinfamilieswithvanderwoudesyndromeandpoplitealpterygiumsyndromeusingpublicwholeexomedatabases
AT standleyjennifer comparativeanalysisofirf6variantsinfamilieswithvanderwoudesyndromeandpoplitealpterygiumsyndromeusingpublicwholeexomedatabases
AT comptonjohn comparativeanalysisofirf6variantsinfamilieswithvanderwoudesyndromeandpoplitealpterygiumsyndromeusingpublicwholeexomedatabases
AT balesherri comparativeanalysisofirf6variantsinfamilieswithvanderwoudesyndromeandpoplitealpterygiumsyndromeusingpublicwholeexomedatabases
AT schuttebrianc comparativeanalysisofirf6variantsinfamilieswithvanderwoudesyndromeandpoplitealpterygiumsyndromeusingpublicwholeexomedatabases
AT murrayjeffreyc comparativeanalysisofirf6variantsinfamilieswithvanderwoudesyndromeandpoplitealpterygiumsyndromeusingpublicwholeexomedatabases