Cargando…
Is molecular allergology cost-effective and cost saving in children with suspected peanut allergy compared to double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), open oral food challenge and skin prick test in Sweden?
Autores principales: | Glaumann, S, Hermansson, L-L, Mascialino, B, Hubben, G, Borres, MP, Nilsson, C |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3723478/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-3-S3-P124 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Basophil allergen threshold sensitivity, and peanut allergen components in relation to DBPCFC in children with suspected peanut allergy
por: Nilsson, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Molecular and immunological characterisation of peanut ingredients for double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC)
por: Johnson, P, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Oral Peanut Challenge Identifies an Allergy but the Peanut Allergen Threshold Sensitivity Is Not Reproducible
por: Glaumann, Susanne, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
P40 - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFC) of a strong tasting food: lessons learned
por: Borschel, Marlene, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Food allergy in the Netherlands: differences in clinical severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC between community and outpatients
por: Le, Thuy-My, et al.
Publicado: (2015)