Cargando…

Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Robots have allowed head and neck surgeons to extirpate oropharyngeal tumors safely without the need for lip-split incision or mandibulotomy. Using robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction is new but essential for oropharyngeal defects that result from robotic tumor excision. We report our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Han Gyeol, Yun, In Sik, Lee, Won Jai, Lew, Dae Hyun, Rah, Dong Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3723995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898431
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.353
_version_ 1782476623454404608
author Song, Han Gyeol
Yun, In Sik
Lee, Won Jai
Lew, Dae Hyun
Rah, Dong Kyun
author_facet Song, Han Gyeol
Yun, In Sik
Lee, Won Jai
Lew, Dae Hyun
Rah, Dong Kyun
author_sort Song, Han Gyeol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robots have allowed head and neck surgeons to extirpate oropharyngeal tumors safely without the need for lip-split incision or mandibulotomy. Using robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction is new but essential for oropharyngeal defects that result from robotic tumor excision. We report our experience with robotic free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects to exemplify the necessity for robotic reconstruction. METHODS: We investigated head and neck cancer patients who underwent ablation surgery and free-flap reconstruction by robot. Between July 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012, 5 cases were performed and patient demographics, location of tumor, pathologic stage, reconstruction methods, flap size, recipient vessel, necessary pedicle length, and operation time were investigated. RESULTS: Among five free-flap reconstructions, four were radial forearm free flaps and one was an anterolateral thigh free-flap. Four flaps used the superior thyroid artery and one flap used a facial artery as the recipient vessel. The average pedicle length was 8.8 cm. Flap insetting and microanastomosis were achieved using a specially manufactured robotic instrument. The total operation time was 1,041.0 minutes (range, 814 to 1,132 minutes), and complications including flap necrosis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the clinically applicable use of robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction, especially using a free flap. A robot can assist the operator in insetting the flap at a deep portion of the oropharynx without the need to perform a traditional mandibulotomy. Robot-assisted reconstruction may substitute for existing surgical methods and is accepted as the most up-to-date method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3723995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37239952013-07-29 Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction Song, Han Gyeol Yun, In Sik Lee, Won Jai Lew, Dae Hyun Rah, Dong Kyun Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Robots have allowed head and neck surgeons to extirpate oropharyngeal tumors safely without the need for lip-split incision or mandibulotomy. Using robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction is new but essential for oropharyngeal defects that result from robotic tumor excision. We report our experience with robotic free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects to exemplify the necessity for robotic reconstruction. METHODS: We investigated head and neck cancer patients who underwent ablation surgery and free-flap reconstruction by robot. Between July 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012, 5 cases were performed and patient demographics, location of tumor, pathologic stage, reconstruction methods, flap size, recipient vessel, necessary pedicle length, and operation time were investigated. RESULTS: Among five free-flap reconstructions, four were radial forearm free flaps and one was an anterolateral thigh free-flap. Four flaps used the superior thyroid artery and one flap used a facial artery as the recipient vessel. The average pedicle length was 8.8 cm. Flap insetting and microanastomosis were achieved using a specially manufactured robotic instrument. The total operation time was 1,041.0 minutes (range, 814 to 1,132 minutes), and complications including flap necrosis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the clinically applicable use of robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction, especially using a free flap. A robot can assist the operator in insetting the flap at a deep portion of the oropharynx without the need to perform a traditional mandibulotomy. Robot-assisted reconstruction may substitute for existing surgical methods and is accepted as the most up-to-date method. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2013-07 2013-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3723995/ /pubmed/23898431 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.353 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Han Gyeol
Yun, In Sik
Lee, Won Jai
Lew, Dae Hyun
Rah, Dong Kyun
Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_full Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_fullStr Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_short Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction
title_sort robot-assisted free flap in head and neck reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3723995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898431
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.353
work_keys_str_mv AT songhangyeol robotassistedfreeflapinheadandneckreconstruction
AT yuninsik robotassistedfreeflapinheadandneckreconstruction
AT leewonjai robotassistedfreeflapinheadandneckreconstruction
AT lewdaehyun robotassistedfreeflapinheadandneckreconstruction
AT rahdongkyun robotassistedfreeflapinheadandneckreconstruction